General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis Judge SUCKS !! FUCKIN WOW !! Now pinching and zooming video is "altering an image" ?!
I thought I could hold out on this judge, but I'm done ... the prosecution is about to show a video that looks like it was going to mud stomp KRs whole testimony.
The defense comes in with "... pinching and zooming alters the image..." which is bullshit and the defense has brought in images they've zoomed in on.
The judge believes the defenses statements that apple alters images when they're pinched as if he's never zoomed in on a picture ... I'm done.
Now the judge doesn't believe common use of zooming in on a video, WT A F...
I'm done
geardaddy
(25,392 posts)And his cheese head.
Heartstrings
(7,349 posts)There is no AI to alter images (and whatever other bs the defense spewed) in Apple products, at least to the best of my knowledge. Please correct me if Im wrong.
This is a train wreck! I hope the prosecution can get a witness to testify to that.
uponit7771
(93,494 posts)Celerity
(53,862 posts)Tribetime
(7,081 posts)So now that there's an objection he agrees it's altering an image.WTF
uponit7771
(93,494 posts)... judges bias.
omg, it looks like the defense might have hurt itself because if the DA can get the video in when the jury is fresh I think it'll show KR pointed his gun first at the crowd after he came from behind the "Duramax" truck and people got pissed at him after that ... chasing him etc.
The kid went from stupid illegal act to wanting to start shit ... looks like he had pointed his gun before he got to the 63rd station.
These guys were looking to shoot people and that's what the dumb as kid did
Calista241
(5,633 posts)and then using the pinch and zoom feature. Converting a 2d source image into a 3d image is going to contain some amount of guesswork and modifications at the code level.
uponit7771
(93,494 posts)... it was the defense who introduced the idea of 3d images not the DA.
The DA hasn't shown the video and if they're going to show it in 3d or not, they judge didn't even ask !!
I'm thinking the DA's about to blow the "defense" story of KR out of the water showing him pointing his rifle first at people in the crowd while not being attacked because the left off of what happened after he came around the Duramax Truck.
Ellipsis
(9,430 posts)LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)uponit7771
(93,494 posts)... wasn't even allowed to show in chambers what he wanted to do.
The defense and the judge has no idea what the DA was about to do ... this is train wreck
Evolve Dammit
(21,563 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,906 posts)I know less about this subject than anyone in this room.
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Prudy Schroeder is wise to your infernal machinations!
Celerity
(53,862 posts)monkeyman1
(5,109 posts)Jon King
(1,910 posts)Its crazy how comfortable the killer and the judge are with each other.
moondust
(21,249 posts)Twice. IMO a measure of someone's judgment--or serious lack thereof.
Possibly an avid 2A/NRA supporter doing all he can to defend his little gunner boy.
Cobalt Violet
(9,974 posts)White Right-wing male privileged even worse. They're all above the law.
uponit7771
(93,494 posts)uponit7771
(93,494 posts)... some protesters then skipped trials dates and did the shit he did.
There's ... NO FUCKIN WAY ... this judge would be acting the way he did
Igel
(37,410 posts)It had a large article about how the mother, an anti-war activist was at the grave of her son.
It was cloudy, drizzly, and there she was, alone, mourning her son. It was spontaneous, a mother's love for her lost son. Truly pathetic, in the sense of "arousing compassion and sympathy."
Then I saw the origin Getty image.
She was surrounded by a dozen reporters, with boom mikes pixels above her head. And umbrellas, let the mics get ruined. In the background--not visible in the close-up--was a catering truck. And to the left, the catering table for the reporters. With maybe 20 others in the background. Not to mention the satellite tv trucks capturing edited video of the "mourning."
It wasn't a "lone mother mourning her son." It was a photo op, a planned press conference.
The zoom-in was the lie. It stripped away context. The context said "manipulative photo-op."
Don't know if that's true in this case, but it's always a possibility and in the interest of accuracy it has to be considered.
dsc
(53,333 posts)And are doing the modern equivalent of using a magnifying glass
miyazaki
(2,603 posts)What the flying fuck.