Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
Wed Nov 17, 2021, 07:59 PM Nov 2021

"Optics" of Rittenhouse judge complaining about clerk picking "a Black, the Black, the only Black"

Rob McDowall FRSA @robmcd85
Ah ok, so Judge Schroeder who is hearing the Rittenhouse case has referred to a juror in another case as "a black, the black, the only black". I kid you not.


Judge Bruce Schroeder made the remark on Wednesday when explaining his decision to allow Mr Rittenhouse to pick the names of the six jurors who would not be joining the final jury of 12.

In a rambling explanation, Judge Schroeder said the last time he allowed a court clerk to pick names was about two decades ago in a trial with a Black defendant.

He said there “a bad optic” after clerk chose “a Black, the Black, the only Black” in the jury pool.

“There were 13 jurors, one of whom was Black. And when the clerk, the government official, drew the name out of the tumbler, it was a Black, the Black, the only Black. There was nothing wrong with it, it was all OK, but what do they talk about – optics, nowadays … That was a bad optic, I thought,” he said.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/kyle-rittenhouse-judge-bruce-schroeder-jury-b1959564.html




Jon Lion Fine Art @jonlionfineart2 6h
“… A black, the black, the only black”

-Judge Rittenhouse
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Optics" of Rittenhouse judge complaining about clerk picking "a Black, the Black, the only Black" (Original Post) bigtree Nov 2021 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author Claustrum Nov 2021 #1
I think you completely missed what happened. Hoyt Nov 2021 #2
The clickbait headline makes u believe the exact opposite okaawhatever Nov 2021 #5
yo - I think it is his wording that is at issue. consider_this Nov 2021 #15
again, the judge might be a total douche stopdiggin Nov 2021 #18
This judge is mentally ill. ratchiweenie Nov 2021 #3
He is obviously senile, stupid, and shitty. Another one to go rot in hell. JanMichael Nov 2021 #4
AND HE'S THE OLDEST JUDGE ON THE BENCH IN WISCONSIN......he needs to go, AND NOW. a kennedy Nov 2021 #6
He's up for re-election in 2026. I doubt he'll be re-elected jimfields33 Nov 2021 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author a kennedy Nov 2021 #8
Judge Schroeder is like the red pill the conspiracy theorists talk about, or, Here America ShazamIam Nov 2021 #7
Why is he concerned about the optics of fairness vis-a-vis the defendant and not vis-a-vis the RockRaven Nov 2021 #9
Fuck that judge Blue Owl Nov 2021 #10
Why was it determined when it was time for the jury to deliberate? LiberalFighter Nov 2021 #12
18 jurors were selected and sat through trial. THEN, 6 were eliminated. My guess, to keep em engaged Hoyt Nov 2021 #13
It's to assure that all jurors are paying attention xmas74 Nov 2021 #16
He don't see his own optics!1 UTUSN Nov 2021 #14
+1 uponit7771 Nov 2021 #20
Want to do some about the Judge in the Rittenhouse trial, file a complaint. LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2021 #17
The judge is past his sell-by date. TomSlick Nov 2021 #19

Response to bigtree (Original post)

okaawhatever

(9,462 posts)
5. The clickbait headline makes u believe the exact opposite
Wed Nov 17, 2021, 08:26 PM
Nov 2021

of what happened. Two decades ago he presided over a trial w/a black defendant. The jurors were 12 white and 1 black. There were 13 because one person becomes the alternate. When the clerk drew the name to see which juror would become the alternate the clerk pulled the only black juror to serve as the alternate. While the process was normal and fair, he realized the optics might make the defendant question the fairness of the process and decided to allow the defendant to pull the alternates name so optically it would seem much fairer.

Clearly this article is meant to create division and anger. Don’t let it. The judge might be a Grade A douchebag I don’t know, but his decision to allow Rittenhouse to pick the alternate is the same thing he’s done for 20 years, and the rationale was based on fairness.

consider_this

(2,203 posts)
15. yo - I think it is his wording that is at issue.
Wed Nov 17, 2021, 10:07 PM
Nov 2021

he says ' it was a Black, the Black, the only Black.'
c'mon! - how about say - 'he drew the only black juror' - but 'a black, the black' - jeez!!!

stopdiggin

(11,306 posts)
18. again, the judge might be a total douche
Thu Nov 18, 2021, 01:20 AM
Nov 2021

and a goofball - but you're pointing to style points or 'optics' (as the judge would have it) rather than anything with real prejudicial or racial impact or intent. (as the click-bait headline is so clearly trying to imply)

Response to JanMichael (Reply #4)

ShazamIam

(2,571 posts)
7. Judge Schroeder is like the red pill the conspiracy theorists talk about, or, Here America
Wed Nov 17, 2021, 08:28 PM
Nov 2021

is justice as we have it.

RockRaven

(14,966 posts)
9. Why is he concerned about the optics of fairness vis-a-vis the defendant and not vis-a-vis the
Wed Nov 17, 2021, 08:43 PM
Nov 2021

decedents (aka "alleged victims" ), the public, or the state?

LiberalFighter

(50,928 posts)
12. Why was it determined when it was time for the jury to deliberate?
Wed Nov 17, 2021, 09:07 PM
Nov 2021

I thought alternate jury members were decided before the trail started.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
13. 18 jurors were selected and sat through trial. THEN, 6 were eliminated. My guess, to keep em engaged
Wed Nov 17, 2021, 09:34 PM
Nov 2021

I actually think that's a good idea. Keep the "alternates" from daydreaming and being behind if they have to step in.

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
16. It's to assure that all jurors are paying attention
Wed Nov 17, 2021, 10:31 PM
Nov 2021

It's actually a decent idea in theory. If you don't know if you're a juror or an alternate upfront you're more likely to oayy attention to the testimony and evidence.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Optics" of Rittenhouse j...