General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Optics" of Rittenhouse judge complaining about clerk picking "a Black, the Black, the only Black"
Rob McDowall FRSA @robmcd85Ah ok, so Judge Schroeder who is hearing the Rittenhouse case has referred to a juror in another case as "a black, the black, the only black". I kid you not.
Judge Bruce Schroeder made the remark on Wednesday when explaining his decision to allow Mr Rittenhouse to pick the names of the six jurors who would not be joining the final jury of 12.
In a rambling explanation, Judge Schroeder said the last time he allowed a court clerk to pick names was about two decades ago in a trial with a Black defendant.
He said there a bad optic after clerk chose a Black, the Black, the only Black in the jury pool.
There were 13 jurors, one of whom was Black. And when the clerk, the government official, drew the name out of the tumbler, it was a Black, the Black, the only Black. There was nothing wrong with it, it was all OK, but what do they talk about optics, nowadays That was a bad optic, I thought, he said.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/kyle-rittenhouse-judge-bruce-schroeder-jury-b1959564.html
Link to tweet
Jon Lion Fine Art @jonlionfineart2 6h
A black, the black, the only black
-Judge Rittenhouse
Response to bigtree (Original post)
Claustrum This message was self-deleted by its author.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)okaawhatever
(9,462 posts)of what happened. Two decades ago he presided over a trial w/a black defendant. The jurors were 12 white and 1 black. There were 13 because one person becomes the alternate. When the clerk drew the name to see which juror would become the alternate the clerk pulled the only black juror to serve as the alternate. While the process was normal and fair, he realized the optics might make the defendant question the fairness of the process and decided to allow the defendant to pull the alternates name so optically it would seem much fairer.
Clearly this article is meant to create division and anger. Dont let it. The judge might be a Grade A douchebag I dont know, but his decision to allow Rittenhouse to pick the alternate is the same thing hes done for 20 years, and the rationale was based on fairness.
consider_this
(2,203 posts)he says ' it was a Black, the Black, the only Black.'
c'mon! - how about say - 'he drew the only black juror' - but 'a black, the black' - jeez!!!
stopdiggin
(11,306 posts)and a goofball - but you're pointing to style points or 'optics' (as the judge would have it) rather than anything with real prejudicial or racial impact or intent. (as the click-bait headline is so clearly trying to imply)
ratchiweenie
(7,754 posts)JanMichael
(24,887 posts)a kennedy
(29,661 posts)jimfields33
(15,801 posts)Response to JanMichael (Reply #4)
a kennedy This message was self-deleted by its author.
ShazamIam
(2,571 posts)is justice as we have it.
RockRaven
(14,966 posts)decedents (aka "alleged victims" ), the public, or the state?
Blue Owl
(50,373 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,928 posts)I thought alternate jury members were decided before the trail started.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)I actually think that's a good idea. Keep the "alternates" from daydreaming and being behind if they have to step in.
xmas74
(29,674 posts)It's actually a decent idea in theory. If you don't know if you're a juror or an alternate upfront you're more likely to oayy attention to the testimony and evidence.
UTUSN
(70,694 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,231 posts)TomSlick
(11,098 posts)It's time to retire.