General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMormonism is NO different than any other religion or club
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by REP (a host of the General Discussion forum).
ALL religions believe what many might call "non-standard" beliefs. Virgin births, prophets riding to heaven on winged horses, Red Sea parting, etc.
Many religions have secret rituals. IN many cases, they are the same rituals. Freemasonry and E Clampus Vitus have similar secret rituals, and Mormonism and Freemasonry have almost the SAME rituals.
So pointing out that Romney has different beliefs just means we weren't raised by them.
I guarantee if you explained Catholocism to an Extraterrestrial they would think YOU were crazy.
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)You obviously don't know much about LDS
"So pointing out that Romney has different beliefs just means we weren't raised by them."
Yes. So what?
Is this your defense for the Confederate flag, also?
We all get our beliefs from somewhere. And not all beliefs are equally good. It sucks that bad people got that way through culture or genetics, but they did.
That does not negate the notion of good and bad.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)And yes, Joseph Smith was a con man, a horse thief, and a 33rd Degree Mason. Brigham Young was a 32nd Degree Mason. Wonder where they got their ceremonies?
Of course stealing ceremonies and gods is nothing new. Christianity borrowed heavily from Mithras, Zoastrianism and Horus. Later, when Rome went Christian, they just converted all the pagan priests, holidays and rituals to Christian ones. The Vestal Virgins became the nuns, Pontifus Maximus became Pope, and so on...
Even Ancient Judaism stole the god Yahweh from the Semetic Pantheon of gods.
As weird as the Mormon's ceremonies are, nothing beats simulated cannibalism (Christianity)
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)You are trying to measure aberrance by an objective standard, which misses the point.
Aberrant is a relative concept. The fact that Mormons are incredibly weird ***by the standards of America*** is a reasonable thing for someone to note and weigh in the context of whether a devoted adherent of something is a plausible president.
Mormons are outsiders, intentionally. They are separate from American society intentionally. They are weird for the sake of being weird. They chose to set themselves far apart from the American mainstream.
That doesn't make them bad people, intrinsically, but it does make them weird.
You cannot say that LDS is no weirder than Catholicism because weird is a subjective standard.
Both are equally false, but they are not equally weird. Except to an alien. But aliens don't vote so it really doesn't matter what their perspective is.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)But I lump them all into the category called "Unproven" and "Made Up"
geardaddy
(25,392 posts)loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Theres probuably hundreds of religious groups and ethnic groups who like to be on the outside.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)Just don't try to be president of a society you choose not be part of. It is as strange as priests counseling married couples.
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)Being such a bigot, I view being entirely outside the mainstream of American life, and indifference to national and world affairs, to be a negative trait in a President.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)geardaddy
(25,392 posts)even more than Mormons, but they don't seem to be running for office to control the rest of us.
struggle4progress
(126,153 posts)Issues, that made Americans grossly uncomfortable with early Mormonism, like polygamy, must have been largely resolved before statehood was granted in 1896
Taverner
(55,476 posts)I don't think the Mormons are some a secret cabal hell bent on ruling the world - well at least not any more than any OTHER religion is...
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)the only one?
You are wrong, however, about the Mormons. Why else do you think they have it as a MISSION to note and posthumously baptize AS a Mormon EVERY SINGLE AMERICAN? Why else do you think they go on proseletyzing MISSIONS to France, which is already rather civilized?
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-803776
It is ironic that the Mormon Church that plans to control the United States and world governments is based upon false premises. The Mormon Conspiracy has a review the documentation that proves the fraudulent nature of the church, and begins with an analysis of Joseph Smiths Book of Mormon. This book is claimed by the church to be the only true gospel and although the church uses the King James version of the Bible, it is asserted by them to have been altered by man over the centuries. The Mormon Church began its history with a conspiracy by Joseph Smith to fool the local people with his book. This has continued to the present.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)jerseyjack
(1,361 posts)Maybe Mitt believes he is the savior. Notice Mitt does not have specifics for his goals. Is that because he believes God will guide him after he is elected?
Taverner
(55,476 posts)All religions preach about someone who will make everything right.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)There is a reason why "Lying for the Lord" is LDS doctrine. The end justifies the means, including lying to people, murdering Gentiles to steal their children and wealth and frame Indians for the deeds, segregating AA blood in LDS hospitals until just a few years ago, etc.
I won't even get into their whole LGBT hate/Prop 8/Women as galactic brood mares/anti women civil rights/baptising the dead/taking over BSA stuff.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)Some of these people pretend Mormons are just some quaint little benevolent group.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)His hearing orders from God and thinking he had some divine goal. We can't take another one in the white house.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)I am not saying racism didn't exist in other religions but they did have internal fights over such issues. With Mormons it was and in my view still is a basic tenet of their beliefs. Voting for a Mormon is no different than voting for the KKK.
In the end I agree that all religions are just cults but some of them are more hideous than others.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)Would you say voting for Harry Reid is no different than voting for the KKK?
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Ryan and Rmoney have made no such statements. Their governance and actions indicate they do not believe in that sharp line.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)He's made it clear he strongly supports a bright line between his personal beliefs and a secular government (like Biden and JFK and others have been explicit on this).
A recent example: "
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says he believes marriage should be between a man and a woman ..."
snip
The Nevada Democrat says he believes that people should marry whomever they want, and that, in his words, "it's no business of mine if two men or two women want to get married."
Reid says his children and grandchildren already take marriage equality as a given and that their view is a glimpse of the future."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/09/harry-reid-gay-marriage_n_1504839.html
Taverner
(55,476 posts)Separation of Church and State (not enough room to type that out)
And that alone is reason to reject him
Hell, I would be against a UNITARIAN who argues against that separation!
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)can and will transform the US into a Mormon country.
Here we are - back to square one.
If Rmoney isn't against the SOCAS (I've been scolded for using acronyms even though they are soooo much easier), then its imperative to examine his faith as a voter should look at all aspects of a potential candidate.
And doing so shouldn't bring down a rain of epithets about a person being some kind of religious bigot or hater or divisive or whatever.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)I don't but am willing to be educated if someone else can come up with a prophet whose going to transform the United States specifically, into a theocracy.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)lalalu
(1,663 posts)was not comfortable having a black president either. It is why the democrats in congress have been weak and lame in their support of the president.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)chimpymustgo
(12,774 posts)Taverner
(55,476 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)by the Southern Baptist Convention, so was Separate but Equal and all the poll taxes.
To this day this is exactly how many of our most fundie Christian denominations, including LDS, justify the hate of the gay.
No, this smacks of the red phone\white phone comments before the 1960 election.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)To this day racism is still a a part of most religions. The difference is that there are at least people trying to combat it. In fact the growing secularism in America is due to people rejecting their views on many issues.
If anyone thinks Mormons have rejected their tenets in any shape or form then they deluded themselves. They are one of the most hateful cults in America.
I don't belong to any religion because of these issues.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)and you go on and create the other. What would you like to do? Now be honest, the way you are talking.
Yes, they are weird... so is every other religion that you did not grow in.
Yes they are fundamentalist, but they are having those fights already. They are handling it the way any religion does when they start to have that fight, they throw people out... but they already are having that fight. Sooner or later that fight will grow large.
But you keep telling yourself they are "the other."
lalalu
(1,663 posts)is just weird then you need to review their beliefs about black people. There is a reason Utah is one of the whitest states in America. The whole state hung out the no black people sign. Mormons are racist to the core.
There is a difference between individuals with racist views who try to influence a religion and a whole religion built around racism that makes it a mission to teach their racism. Mormons have and still make it their mission to preach racism and sexism.
Even in their version of heaven they would hang out a no black people sign. They even want a klan rally in the afterlife.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)but about you. Really.
There are ways to react to things, and creating the other is not the right way.
Be as critical as you want, but be careful of that line.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)excuse their racism. Also, do not threaten me for speaking the truth about their racist views.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)every major denomination has elements of racism. After all, all these religions ARE TRIBALISTIC and are there to evolve as part of the tribe. So why wouldn't a small one have elements of it? Com'on, it is almost a given.
So what would you like to do? Let's air it. you would like to go back to the official policies of the US Government to openly oppress them? Is that it?
I am not justifying their racism...yes, they are racist, and they hate the gay, but you are justifying yours.
Mirror, mirror on the wall, kind of a thing.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)The democrats have racists just like republicans. Based on your views there are no differences between them and policies at all. Based on your views there would be no difference in voting for a democrat, republican, or the Aryan Brotherhood.
After all they each have racist members right? According to you there are no degrees of influence of racism on their views and policies.
Fortunately most people know the difference. Mormons are very close to the Aryan Brotherhood.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)I am not going to create the other just because. You go right ahead.
I know what happens when that is done.
Yes, I will fight the LSD when they start doing their hate the gay in the political arena (and they should be taxed for that shit), but I am not going to make blanket statements. You are.
Nor am I going to vote against Romney because he is a Mormon, but because of HIS POLICIES. THey are not just wrong, but wrong headed.
I know what creating the other (which for the record SOME mormons do), leads to. My family was personally touched by that, we call that the Holocaust. I also debriefed kids who came from Guatemala, who saw their parents killed by dead squads, their crime, they were Maya.
So let's be clear, do you want the US Government to go back to it's policy of open religious persecution?
lalalu
(1,663 posts)If anything religions in America have been protected way more than they should be. They still are and Mormons are one of the protected groups.
Yes, i know Mormons were hated by others and faced discrimination. It is also true that Mormons helped to generate the hate and intolerance that deflected back on them. Their history of hate and violence followed them to Utah and it continues to be the foundation they were built on.
Mormons slaughtered many innocent people traveling west. Read about Mountain Meadows.The only reason they weren't prosecuted was because they helped to keep the west white and after the war freed slaves out. They blocked the formation of Oklahoma as a haven state for freed slaves Native Americans and put out the big not welcome sign.
Your family experienced the Holocaust but are still white and would be welcomed by Mormons. The Mayans kids you talk about would also be welcomed by Mormons. You state this is about me but it is more about your saying Mormons are nice to everyone else but black people so to hell with black people.
The problem with Mormons is they can't take what they dish out. Just like all the other racist white organizations playing the victim.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)At least in the other monotheistic religions women ascend to heaven the same as men.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)Not sure tho
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Taverner
(55,476 posts)loli phabay
(5,580 posts)And i mean its pretty explicit.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)With so many various scholars disputing what is real or not is crazy.
I will go with the Quran thank you very much.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)I go with what adherents of a religion believe their holy books mean rather than third parties.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)The op has it right all faiths and beliefs are strange to outsiders whether its cannabilism animals having spirits parting of seas or the walking hamburger is sacred.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)We should judge institutions by their current beliefs and policies.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Joe Biden believes in the Immaculate Conception. How would one rank these beliefs in terms of credibility?
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)this is no different than the fear of a catholic in the WH in 1960
OH MY the WHITE telephone... the POPE will run US Policy.
aletier_v
(1,773 posts)and get some hands-on experience.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Color me surprised, really.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)Your family was affected by the Holocaust and persecuted for religious reasons. I can understand your stance when you feel the same is being done to Mormons. I still disagree and feel this is different.
Even with the Holocaust there were racial components. Jewish people were not seen as being of "pure" European or Aryan blood.
Mormons are really into the whole concept of racial lines. It is why they control places like ancestry.com to know every persons ancestral line. They fully embrace it as a tenet of what places people should occupy on earth and after they die. That to me is a dangerous philosophy and too close to white supremacy groups.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)Snake Handlers, Primitive Baptists, any group of Pentecostals...
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Jaysus on a stick, the comments from the RW in 1959 were the same you are making right now!
For the record, I am not voting for Mitt, but that is because I fundamentally disagree with his policies, not his religion.
Try it sometime.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)I was around in 1959; I know exactly what the comments were then.
SO HERE IS MY POINT: ROMNEY IS A THEOCRAT. JFK WAS NOT.
SUCCINCT ENOUGH FOR YOU?
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)go for it.
What would you like to do with the other now that you have created it?
Have fun with that mental exercise. I don't have to imagine.
And YES IT IS THE SAME DAMN COMMENTS. THE FRACKING HISTORIC RECORD IS DAMN CLEAR ON THAT!
Occulus
(20,599 posts)and they tell me you are as wrong as the day is long. They tell me a devout mormon President would be a Bad Thing, and are informed by their actual experiences as members of the mormon church.
I will listen to them first. I will also dismiss what you have to say on the subject. They are 100%- 1000%- more informed on the subject than you or I will ever be.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)not his religion.
Clear enough?
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Mormon bishops aren't paid for their services, and the appointment is temporary. Catholic bishops are appointed for life and are paid a salary.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Taverner
(55,476 posts)IN it's early days, Brigham Young likened the LDS church as a beehive, trying to cultivate the hive mind
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)Especially for females.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)Similar levels of authority.
If you're saying one doesn't have authority or responsibility unless they are on the payroll, you're misleading people about the role or you're misinformed about the role.
But your continued defense, more than I've ever seen you do for Food Stamps, for universal healthcare, for a litany of progressive causes, is noted.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)I have plenty of reasons not to vote for Mitt Romney, all of which have to do with his PRESENT policies. His past duties in his church, and the official professed positions of his church, are not issues for me at all.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)Including pastoral care, and determining who is fit for an endowment, and giving medical care orders.
They have much more power over individuals than a Catholic Bishop or even a parish priest.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)During the 1960s many Catholics were starting to break away from lockstep following the church. Many Catholics were engaging in social issues and change. There was a reaching across the aisle to different people and views. It was a major reason why Kennedy won the black vote. Mormons were not changing at the time and continue to adhere to their racist views.
Romney will never reach across to black people because Mormons still have their racist views as a main tenet in their religion. The rightwng racists and Mormon racism are a perfect match.
Kennedy was a Catholic who got the black vote and presidents of other religions also got the black vote. Romney is a Mormon who won't and no one in their right mind is fooled about their views of black people.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Taverner
(55,476 posts)Catholic Church being the largest Christian Denomination
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)To prove that CoS isn't a cult.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Hinduism is no weirder than Christianity either, but try getting right-wing Christians to vote for a Hindu. They won't.
It's worth pointing out specifics of the Mormon faith in an election, not because it's objectively any more irrational and weird than other religions, but because it's a major, major weakness for a right-wing candidate who has to appeal to bigots.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)?
Taverner
(55,476 posts)And it's all a rerun.
Mormonism stole from the Freemasons.
Christianity stole from Mithras and Horus.
Judaism stole from the Semetic Pantheon.
Calvinism stole from Islam.
The list goes on...
Marr
(20,317 posts)All religious beliefs are equally irrational, though the less familiar always seem more "weird".
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)There is no proof that, if there was an historical Jesus, that he was a carpenter. Since his father was, he may have been, but he may also have something else.
Also, resurrection was rebirth, so Jesus wouldn't have been a zombie, who are the undead.
For the record, I am a non believer.
Marr
(20,317 posts)And resurrection was not "rebirth". There was no second womb involved in the story of Jesus rising again after three days, nor he was made an infant anew.
Marr
(20,317 posts)For the record, the Bible describes him as a carpenter or stonemason.
Politicub
(12,328 posts)In the name of religious diversity, I wanted to enrich people's lives by introducing this peek at Mormonism.
I've always been curious about what goes on in the temple, and I'm sure others are, too.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)For further reading, check out the Rosicrucians, the Masons and the Scottish Rite. You'll see lots of paralells.
My own hypothesis is that they were all (including the Mormons) trying to find a way to reconcile Bedouin law with modernity. And it's impossible to do that without replacing large sections of text.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)and his religion doesn't even come into them. He's an entitled, fraudulent bully that lies every time his mouth opens. Why would I expect him to be anymore honest in his religious life than he is in any other facet of his life?
His adherence to his religious beliefs are probably just as fraudulent as everything else about the man. He doesn't talk about his religion because even he probably has no idea what he believes about it. He doesn't know what he believes about anything else.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)mission; he has performed Church duties.
"He doesn't talk about his religion because" not only because that is not what American politicians do, but also because Mormonism wouldn't fly AT ALL with Evangelicals, Billy Graham notwithstanding.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I figure if he will lie about everything else, he probably doesn't strongly believe in his religion, either. That's just my point of view; you may be right, he may believe it. We'll never really know though because he can't open his mouth without changing his mind or being dishonest. That's why I take any "beliefs" that Mitt Romney claims he has with a grain of salt.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)I think we can both agree, however, that he has no business even being in the running for POTUS! He would probably start WW III ten minutes after the election results if he wins. That man can't open his mouth without bungling something, pissing someone off or just being flat out liar.
The thought of him in office terrifies me.
sellitman
(11,745 posts)Some more than others.
Mormonism sure is a weirdo though.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)Personally I don't see a purpose for them and they don't make sense. They believe in an all knowing, all seeing, and powerful entity. Yet they need a middleman (church) and must go through bureaucracy to contact this entity.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)lalalu
(1,663 posts)If God is all around then just speak to the being. Why contact a priest, preacher, rabbi, monk, ........it seems like a waste of time. As if we don't deal with enough bureaucracy.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)Taverner
(55,476 posts)And Romney has proven that he will act like a bully and a psychopath.
No religion needed to draw that conclusion.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)during both his governorship and his tenure at Bain.
Sorry but trying to dismiss his religion is nuts. Its clearly a factor.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)But I'm a Positive Atheist.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)IT'S NONE OF YOUR BEESWAX!
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)...of why we must and SHOULD point out Romney's very different beliefs from mainstream Christianity. And no, it's not because Mormons are better or worse in their beliefs than most other religions, or because their religion is decidedly racist, or anything like that. If the history of bitter fights over slavery, segregation, women's rights and gays with only religious bullshit to support the viability of such inequality has proved anything it's that most religions are bigoted and have evil beliefs.
But here's the point: the religious right wants a leader in the White House that espouses THEIR version of Christianity. If we point out that Romney's religion is most decidedly not THEIR version of Christianity, if we point out to them that Romney's religion has him swearing--SWEARING--not to maintain a separation of church and state meaning that he would turn the U.S. Mormon if he could find a way to do it...If we point this all out to those Christians who shake in terror at the thought of anyone NOT of their religion being president and taking away their rights to practice their religion as they want to practice it...
Then they may not vote for Romney. Simple as that. THAT is the point. The whole point. The ONLY point. Any chance, however slim, of making evangelical, right-wing Christians run screaming from Romney--write in someone else or vote for someone else or not vote at all...that is well worth posting a video that details the Mormon religion, what it believes, and how different it is from mainstream Christianity.
Do you get it now?
Taverner
(55,476 posts)The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)The, let us call them, odd beliefs, of the Abrahamic religions, of Buddhism and Hinduism, date back to ancient days. Their origins are shrouded, and certainly arose in a pre-scientific, pre-Enlightenment era, where people had a very shaky grasp on the mechanics of the natural world. In such a context things like prophets rising to heaven and parting a great sea's waters, raisings of the dead, and a whole variety of miracles, could be readily believed, and having been believed, they come down to the present day hallowed by ancient usage, benefiting from a sort of 'grandfather clause', of the sort that wil exempt from some new regulation a chemical that has been used as an additive for many years prior.
Mormonism, however, is a recent concoction. It's whole history is laid bare. That its founder was a grifter is an established fact of history. That he made it all up is painfully obvious. Thus there is a natural question concerning the people who profess belief in this fabric of lies told by a con-man not much more than a hundred fifty years ago. the question being, to put it bluntly: 'The fuck were you thinking!?!'
The time, by the way, is not so far back as one might suppose. About fifteen years ago, we had a neighbor who had been born in 1910 ( she sort of adopted out daughter as an honorary grand-daughter ). Had she met, as a child, a person in their eighties, that person would have been a teenager when Smith was riding high at Nauvoo....
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)as well as other things... it is a mishmash of a few things.
That said, age is important, but to say that we should be going where many here insist into going, is not just silly, but smells of the other.
It is dangerous.
Now to age... well young religions tend to be more muscular in pushing believes... than older religions... but also they have been persecuted. Should we go back to that? It surely reads like some folks here would love to do that. And if that is the wish, I will stand in the way of doing that shit.
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)It does not grow organically out of the thing, and the seams and cracks are very obvious.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)I will take my own, and I really annoyed a Rabbi doing that one day. But we were poking holes into the believes of the major religions.
A man who was spoken to by god in the form of a bush... ok, what was Moses high on? (Shrooms most likely, assuming Moses existed)
Following with the same story line... Moses was left on the river to be picked up by the Princes... or was that a Babylonian story, can't really keep things straight.
The song of Songs, one of the most beautiful lyrical poems in the Bible, or was that an Egyptian poem of 1000 years before?
Then there is the story of Noah... and the flood, which we actually found evidence off, near Ur... and once again it is originally a babylonian story.
The first kind mentioned is David, a shepherd small time figure of probably the 10th century BCE... nothing like a powerful king or anything... oh and the Exodus is a nice story made of whole cloth based on several legends of the period.
Oh and we know who commissioned these stories... King Josiah, one of the last ones, around the seventh century BCE, so all those stories reflect the geopolitics of the era.
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)Nor does being born into a family sharing a belief excuse a person from employing ordinary critical faculties of intelligence; by no means does everyone 'born to a religion' hew to it in adult life.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)are we?
Last time I checked the calendar reads 2012... and every member of the Mormon Church today was born into it.
For the record, when King Josiah finally created his state religion, the one I follow, sort off today, 6000+ years ago, people really were sort of not born into it either, but were converted by the force of the sword.
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)You might want to check your chronologies....
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)and we know it was FOUR GROUPS of scribes.... it was a STATE religion. Heresy, not given by God.
And that is my point Sir.
So it was commissioned by a King to keep people in line. Here we had a huckster creating a religion, Then we have a more recent one created on a dare...
To the believers it matters little.
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)If recollection serves, he had not even reached puberty when the forged book 'discovered' in renovating the temple was presented to him....
But again, the point under discussion is not that there are frauds and crimes in the history of various religions, but why these stand out in consideration of Mormonism. They do, in the case of the stripling, because it has no cloaking of antiquity and ancient ancestral practice, and the matter of its origin is laid bare in newsprint.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)In my mind religions at this time are maladaptive, but that is another matter, all of them.
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)"Truth, in religion, is that opinion which has survived."
snooper2
(30,151 posts)LOL...
My distinguished judgy
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)not actually Jesus, Heresy I know, we have little evidence he existed... now the apostles on the other hand.
If we are to be fair, the myth of Mythra sounds awfully familiar.
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)Smith has convictions for it on public record...
snooper2
(30,151 posts)They all have fantastical stories and they can't say if their supreme god/gods/beings are made up of matter or not.
I think that pretty much puts all religions under the same header. That would be - Mythology
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)The question is why the nonesense of Mormonism strikes many as somewhat different, and the reason is its youth, that it has arisen in a closely documented period of history, and cannot trace back for thousands of years, as its senior competitors can. They run back to periods in which people can be readily excused for believing nonesense, and in which little solid information about actual origins of beliefs and practices is available. Mormonism arose in a more modern period, where there is little excuse, and the mechanisms of its origin are bare for all to see.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)humans have a need to believe. And quite frankly modern quantum physics, to the average person, is quite frankly not just alien but weird.
Religions, all of them, have an internal logic. (For the record QM does as well, but the math is really, and I mean this, REALLY HARD TO UNDERSTAND) so most humans default to religious belief. As crazy as it sounds to have a man talking to a bush, or another rising from the death three days after he died (Horus started that shit, not Christ), they all are internally consistent and really non changing.
This is why a religion rises. This innate need to believe something higher than yourself.
Religions and science try to answer the same fundamental question. WHERE did we come from? and the other one, WHY?
Yes, Mormomism came to be after the enlightenment, in an era when most people really did not even know their numbers and letters and when witches, warlocks and all that were still ever present. In fact, many areas of the world still fit this description to a T... they happen to be regions where religions have a higher hold than others where more secular thinking has taken hold.
The US is becoming more secular, but it is still the MOST religious nation of OECD economies. THat is a fact Jack, you can bank on it. So yes, why we have had not one, not two, but several denominations rise over the course of the last 200+ years since the rise of the country as an independent nation. Let's not start with those that came and at times disappeared, in the Colonial period.
My personal favorite is Hubbard's little exercise. Don't tell the faithful, but that was on a dare with Heinlein.
I will repeat this about all religions at this point, especially due to that nonsense about "domion over the Earth and the creatures of the Earth." (Deuteronomy), at this point, they are all maladaptive. And yes Eastern religions have the equivalent. Yup, all of them, but we as a species need to overcome (hard to do, I think in this sense we might be domed as a species), this intense tribalism, which religion is part of...
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)you're setting up a ridiculous thing.
to tolerate a religion, we must not criticize it and criticizing it, as Magistrate has done, is simply talking about the facts of that religion.
would you like us to be silent and not comment on religion? should we not inform others of a religion's history and beliefs?
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)That's the comparison she's making if you start discussing the various religions.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)I asked Magistrate another question and I will aks this of you as well. Should we go back to a period when Mormoms were openly persecuted by the United States Government as policy? Because this is what some folks here seem to want. So let's air this... should we?
As to the history of mormomism, yes, Smith was a huckster, but you know what Judaism was also created as a STATE religion in the seventh Century BCE and commissioned by the KING. I know Heresy.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)That is why I reject them all - and even if I believed in a god - I would reject religion
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)but at this point I think we reached the mal adaptive stage.
Let me explain, it provided the tribe, and yes they originated with tribes, the social glue to evolve.
But at this point, given how they are used to push things that are killing us, global warming, dominion over the earth, they have become quite maladaptive.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)to other atrocities committed by the founding members.
But beyond a simple historical discussion, a theological discussion and critique doesn't make one into some kind of bigot no matter how much you want that to be so.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)saying that he was saying we should go back to the time when religions were persecuted.
now, do you really want to go over the ridiculous thing *you* said?
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)have a good day.
And I notice you refuse to answer the question, so let me restate it. Should we go back to an official policy of religious persecution?
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)are those of us who are trying to talk about LDS teachings (and I am a proponent for describing tenets of their religion accurately here for people's information) of wanting to persecute Mormons?
i know non-Mormons who were persecuted in Utah --i don't want anybody to go through that.
who does? who are these people?
do you get upset when we talk about the religious ceremonies as odd? they are odd! communion is odd, frankly, i'm not offended when someone says it is. i'm not persecuted when someone says it is.
what is the big deal?
i lived with that religion and i HAVE A RIGHT to talk about it. the beliefs about women are horrible (many religions' have horrible beliefs about women too, to be fair...).
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Christianity has Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, along with Saint Peter and probably others.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)Of cult behavior for a mainstream faith tradition in the US.
There are some arguments for JW's and Seventh Day Adventists, but all of their doctrines and traditions and rituals are out in the open, and the whole "suppressed person" and blood oath and libel stuff isn't there that much.
Some more arguments for ADF and other Druid paths, as well some other Pagan paths, having secret rites, but they aren't actually secret, nor are they like LDS or CoS.
Lying for the Lord/Xenu and infiltrating the government are also things LDS and CoS have in common, too. Does any other faith path in the US have these as part of their doctrine?
LDS and CoS don't let you deep into the Elite levels of their churches unless you pay lots of money and/or are VIP and Celebs (Marie Osmond should have been excommunicated several times by now, for example, and let us all not even get into the Tom Cruise thing).
I could go on, but have other things to do.
One last thing: both Joseph Smith and Hubbard were known con men. Just an interesting point.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)I see very little similarity between Scientology and the LDS faith. I have a co-worker who is a Mormon. He makes a great designated driver.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)Enough that I often wonder if Hubbard studied Smith's strategies.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)So naturally Islamic heaven is all about water
American Christian heaven is all about money
Mormon Heaven is all about bureaucracy
And Catholic heaven is all about trumpets
I assume that COS heaven involves space ships, being that its inventor was a Sci Fi writer
S_E_Fudd
(1,295 posts)Just like every other religion that enforces dogma over reason and evidence...
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)It won the Cult Wars.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)A little bit of Mithras in my life
A little bit of Horus by my side
A little bit of Zoaster is all I need
A little bit of Dionysus is what I see....
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)And, I say that as an atheist.
Texas Lawyer
(350 posts)Protestant version f Christianity, or Islam, etc. to a disinterested observer in a manner that did not make some of the dogma seem illogical (or based on impossibilities and magic thinking).
With that said, it does seems as if you can make some distinctions among religious beliefs.
For example, the foundations of Scientology are not hidden by the mists of time because it was founded within the lifetime of people who are still alive. It is a religious belief system founded by a person who was also known for writing science fiction books. I have no problem whatsoever with anyone who takes comfort or support from the belief in Scientology. I presume that some ancient Greeks thought of Zeus as a real and literal figure and some probably thought of the depictions of Zeus' life as fables that taught lessons about the culture's values; I presume the same about Moses, and Jesus, and Buddha, and Mohamed, and I know that some people take comfort from their beliefs about these figures, and I feel no differently about people who take comfort from Scientology.
Yet, I also think you could compare Scientology with, for example, Unitarianism.
I think -- objectively -- Scientology IS different from Unitarianism. You can compare the origins and tenets of both belief systems and draw conclusions about the differences. Likewise, I think you can compare the beliefs of those who believe in the Neanderthal, big foot, the Gigantopithecus, the yetti, sea serpents, the Kraken, aliens, angels, plesiosaus, the Loch Ness Monster, and the Homo floresiensis, and hobbits. Some of these beliefs are more rational, some are less rational, and some of these beliefs fall somewhere between the two extreme points on that scale.
If you can distinguish Scientology from Unitarianism, then perhaps you could create a scale with one set of religious beliefs at one end and another set of religious beliefs at the other end.
Do you think you could create such a scale for religious belief systems?
If so, do you think you could put Mormonism somewhere within such a scale?
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)The oath of vengeance was an addition made to the Nauvoo Endowment under the direction of Brigham Young by 1845 in the Nauvoo Temple, soon after the 1844 death of Joseph Smith, Jr.. Participants agreed to be bound by the following oath:
"You and each of you do covenant and promise that you will pray and never cease to pray to Almighty God to avenge the blood of the prophets upon this nation, and that you will teach the same to your children and to your children's children unto the third and fourth generation."...
The oath of vengeance was referenced by John D. Lee in his confession of his involvement in the Mountain Meadows massacre. The oath entered the endowment at a time when many Mormons hoped for retribution for the deaths of Joseph and Hyrum. At least one member of the LDS First Presidency understood the oath to include a personal obligation that, "if he had ever met any of those who had taken a hand in that massacre he would undoubtedly have attempted to avenge the blood of the martyrs." However, other Mormons understood the oath to require actions against the United States directly, while still others believed the oath required only prayers to God for vengeance.
Sound like a conflict with "I do solemnly swear to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States" to me.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)is a perfect example of how violent they can be to protect their religion. Mormons kept Utah all white and all Mormon by slaughtering any non Mormons who came too close their territory. Mountain Meadows was a rare example where they had survivors and proof of what happened.
There was a push to bring them to justice for so many slaughters but it was stopped for two reasons. Mormons agreed not to enter the battle over slavery and then the civil war came. After the Civil War they were not prosecuted because they helped territories that wanted to remain all white and not allow freed slaves. They also joined in the fight to keep Oklahoma from becoming a state for freed slaves and Native Americans to own property.
There is a really ugly history of violence and racism behind Mormons and their quest to keep the west white and Utah a home for Mormons only. They still adhere to those beliefs.
porphyrian
(18,530 posts)...possessed and statisticians.
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)....a religious government headed by Mormons?
I don't know of any, do you?
That makes the Mormon organization VERY different from all other religions, cults, and clubs, in my opinion.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)There are elements of every religion wjo would love to be the government of the US why limit it to just mormons.
Hamlette
(15,556 posts)I was raised an atheist in Utah. We loved to make fun of Mormons. Then I found out that Catholics believe in transubstantiation and fundamentalists think the earth is 6,000 years old. Mormons are not different and their religion is exactly what would have been produced in the US. And there are some good things about Mormons. They are not prudish about sex, at least not as much as some religions.
.
.
.
Can't think of anything else. There are Mormons of all kinds. Some I like more than others.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)and family in California. Just 4 years ago. They say they are sorry. Some of us don't believe them. I don't want to take the chance of a member of this fascist club running our country. They took it upon themselves, because of their belief that they know the absolute truth, and therefore, belief that they know what is best for everyone, to take away our rights in California. Even if you are straight, those rights are your rights also.
That totally separates the Mormon church from just being a harmless little boys club.
It's not just a harmless, benign little boys club. It deliberately hurts innocent people, did so in the recent past, and there is no reason to believe that it will not continue to do so if it is not prevented from doing so.
That Mormon "club" also overwhelmingly votes for republicans.
That Mormon "club" believes the infallible omniscient omnipotent creator of all that exists hangs out on a mythical planet called Kolob.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven%27s_Gate_%28religious_group%29
The mass suicide and killings at Jonestown resulted in the greatest single loss of American civilian life in a non-natural non-accidental disaster prior to the events of September 11, 2001. Casualties at the airstrip included, among others, Congressman Leo Ryan.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peoples_Temple
People have a right to believe what they wish. And I have every right to not trust organizations that deliberately do bad things to good people.

REP
(21,691 posts)This thread violates the SoP for this Forum. Please feel free to repost in one of the Religion Groups.