General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
dsc
(52,829 posts)then it would be a civil rights issue. I have to say, I am unconvinced of that premise.
cinematicdiversions
(1,969 posts)bucolic_frolic
(49,256 posts)Unless or until they gift equal amounts to all those who didn't get a high priced college degree, and the benefits it delivers. Debt relief? Yes. Stretch it out, raise it in peak earning years, lower it early in life and late in life. But gifting that type of asset is just a pure giveaway, and it benefits the best and the brightest.
Budi
(15,325 posts)Link to tweet
The gaslighting question & the honest truthful reply.
He never said he'd forgive 50 grand. So why do they keep trying to hold him to it?
Because that's the game.
helpisontheway
(5,321 posts)Budi
(15,325 posts)Its never enough.
They'll threaten to withold their vote if he doesn't meet their demands.
Now it's 50 grand or else?
Truth is, they'll withold their vote for the next failed populist promise of free stuff..and the next and the next.
Its never going to be gratitude & recognition for the man who they never advocated for in the 1st place. And never will, no matter what he gives them.
That's not their game plan.
Its about opposition.
arlyellowdog
(1,429 posts)Im trying to keep all my kids Democratic voters. They worked during college, took community college courses during the summer, and paid off college loans for their state schools. My son, especially, is annoyed some of his friends want their loans cancelled. I think the interest rate should be lowered instead. But this is the type of issue that Biden knows will result in resentment and loss of votes.
ret5hd
(21,321 posts)that people died of Covid before the vaccine! No one should get the vaccine before those people are answered to!
See how that sounds?
cinematicdiversions
(1,969 posts)JanMichael
(25,529 posts)VarryOn
(2,343 posts)Worked my you-know-what to pay off mine, my wife's, and felt obligated to take care of son's. I'm good on giving people extra time, lower rates, or whatever.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)And I dont hate other people as much as some do, I guess.
My choices were my choices and I dont begrudge anyone else getting a break.
How do you feel about people who win money on game shows?
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)If not, I have no issue with them.
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)And so is mine. And it depends on young people competing in a global economy and paying THEIR taxes which are going to support your ass and mine.
Sick of everyone thinking they live in a libertarian bubble. No other civilized country does this to its college students. None.
Ill bet I pay more taxes than you do, too.
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)I've maxed out my 401(k) contribution for most of my career, and even though I max out social security deductions each year, too, the 401(k) will far and away be my primary source of income. Social security will be a nice little add-on. After seeing my grandparents rely solely on social security, I vowed to never fall into that trap.
tenderfoot
(8,982 posts)
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)That means after the 1970's.
But, still, point taken. It's much more expensive nowadays.
If the taxpayer is going to bear the burden, then they should have a say in what's being studied. Pay for STEM and education degrees and a few business ones. Useful majors. Cap the number of sociology, political science, art, etc majors. Want to major in philosophy? That's on your dime.
marie999
(3,334 posts)For example, if you are a teacher, teach in the inner cities. So much of your debt is canceled each year.
JanMichael
(25,529 posts)So now you tell me is this a Civil Rights issue?
NYC Liberal
(20,398 posts)of 4 year in-state tuition at a public college in each persons state. If you chose to go to a higher cost private school, you can pay the difference.
Torchlight
(4,393 posts)Or is it just an editorial? I think the actual and substantive answer you're looking for lies in that difference.
leftstreet
(36,617 posts)maxsolomon
(36,067 posts)It's hard to be more "broad" without legislation. He's not a dictator.
XRubicon
(2,241 posts)"Student debt cancellation would help close the racial wealth gap"
iemanja
(55,715 posts)then the result would be future students would never be able to get loans because the banks won't be offering them.
ret5hd
(21,321 posts)or, possibly, i dont.
The banks get paid. The loans arent defaulted on, they are paid.
iemanja
(55,715 posts)Xolodno
(6,886 posts)it is a form of indentured servitude.
mcar
(44,203 posts)
Mary in S. Carolina
(1,364 posts)much less opportunity and are paid much less on the dollar then their white male counterparts and the Federal Government has been well aware of this for years.
If, a women or person of color, is getting only 5% of the opportunity and paid 70 cents on the dollar compared to men, then yes this is a civil rights issue.
Women and persons of color should pay (5% x .7) x the cost of a white man's education. Biden needs to go ahead and explain this to the public and then relieve all college debt. Also, Jimmy Carter relieved student loan debt up to 50% and it was a "huge" success.
Note: Most of these discriminatory loans were guaranteed by the federal government
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)None of which the ACLU has taken a position on.
Mary in S. Carolina
(1,364 posts)does not mean it won't in the future and I would not be surprised if the NAACP takes a position. I understand that life is not fair, but most economics policies do not financially strap minorities, for life, like student loans.
In addition, if the self-proclaimed wealthiest, most educated, brightest and the best "Trump and Romney" can file bankruptcy, then why can't someone who signed a predatory loan when they were 18 years old? Student Loans are Predatory.
WhiskeyGrinder
(24,498 posts)It was in this context that Congress and President Lyndon B. Johnson passed the Higher Education Act of 1965. Recognizing the value of broad higher education access, Johnson hoped the legislation would open the doors of opportunity to everyone, especially Black students and other students of color, through Pell Grants and other subsidies.
Yet by the end of the 20th century, just as Black and Brown students and women gained entry after decades-long legal battles and social struggles, reactionary policymakers shifted the significant costs of higher education from the public to individual families. What had been considered a public good when it was predominantly for white men, became a public burden to be shifted to families.
This shift away from public financing, which accelerated after the Great Recession, led to predictable and damaging results: Today the cost of higher education is beyond imagination. It is out of reach for most families, especially Black and Brown students, unless they agree to unsustainable debt. In effect, we are perpetuating the ugly legacy of redlining and housing discrimination by requiring the same Black families that were historically denied wealth to take on a greater debt burden than their white peers.
There are plenty of facts readily available as well, with a quick web search. Such as:
and
Mary in S. Carolina
(1,364 posts)Evidently the ACLU has taken a position.
displacedtexan
(15,696 posts)https://www.americanprogress.org/article/how-predatory-debt-traps-threaten-vulnerable-families/