General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge goes beyond prosecutors' request with sentence for Jan. 6 couple
A U.S. district judge on Wednesday issued a sentence against a couple who took part in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot that went beyond what prosecutors recommended, giving them jail time.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) had asked that Brandon Miller and his wife Stephanie Miller be sentenced to home confinement as part of a 36-month probationary period. The Ohio couple was charged with entering the Capitol, with Brandon Miller livestreaming their actions on Facebook.
As WUSA reported, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan ruled, however, that their actions warranted time behind bars.
"They didn't just walk through a door. They climbed through a broken window ... they knew full well of the violence that had preceded their entry," Chutkan said. "The fact is that they were part of a mob ... that was intent on stopping the lawful transfer of power."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-goes-beyond-prosecutors-request-231246259.html
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)I don't think 20 days and 14 days in jail is going to have much of an impact on them. These folks are traitors and should in my opinion be treated as such. Anything less than 20 years is a joke.
dem4decades
(14,377 posts)blueinredohio
(6,797 posts)That'll teach them.
Joinfortmill
(21,668 posts)gab13by13
(32,761 posts)where DOJ prosecutors are taking the insurrection lightly, prosecutors are continually chastised by judges for not seeking stiffer penalties.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Not a heavy sentence, but maybe it will be enough to give them something to explain to prospective employers, lenders, and police for the rest of their lives.
mountain grammy
(29,209 posts)What bull.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)I *really* do not understand these sentences being handed down.
iemanja
(57,779 posts)radius777
(3,921 posts)for minor crimes typically get much longer sentences.
Crystal Mason, a black woman from Texas who mistakenly voted, was given a sentence of 5 years in prison.
He admitted to the court that his office had not warned Crystal that she couldnt vote while on federal supervised release, according to the State of Texas. In fact, he testified that it was not a part of standard procedure to share that information. That's just not something we do, he told the courtroom.
Yet the state contended that despite never being told she couldnt vote, Crystal should have known.
I came back here and rehabilitated myself, she said on the stand. I went to school for over 11 months and graduated. From there the whole time I was working and going to school. I have my own business now. Why would I dare jeopardize losing a good job, saving my house, and leaving my kids again and missing my son from graduating from high school this year as well as going to college on a football scholarship? I wouldnt dare do that, not to vote."
At trial, the prosecuting attorney asked the court to send a message to illegal voters, and to sentence Crystal to a stern prison sentence.
By the days end, the judge found Crystal guilty and sentenced her to five years in prison.
iemanja
(57,779 posts)What do you want to bet they get no jail time?
Sucha NastyWoman
(3,023 posts)And they get more serious about requesting sentences that fit the severity of the crimes.
Historic NY
(40,130 posts)Skittles
(172,843 posts)THANK YOU
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.