Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,010 posts)
Sun Dec 26, 2021, 01:48 PM Dec 2021

In Texas Supreme Court case, state argues bullet train developer can't use eminent domain

Last edited Sun Dec 26, 2021, 03:14 PM - Edit history (1)

The Texas attorney general’s office has put its weight behind a landowner’s case against the companies developing a controversial Dallas-Houston bullet train, arguing they can’t force people to sell parcels needed for the high-speed rail project.

Weighing in on the matter at the invitation of the Texas Supreme Court, the attorney general’s office offered the latest twist in the nearly decade-long fight over a 240-mile line that would connect Dallas and Houston. While the project has picked up support from leaders of urban areas, it’s encountered hard resistance from residents of the rural counties on its proposed path.

One of those residents, Leon County landowner James Miles, sued Texas Central after the private company sought permission to survey his 600-acre property in 2015 as part of its efforts to examine the land for the project. Miles asked the courts to declare that the company did not have the right to enter his property because it does not have the eminent domain authority granted to railroad companies.

In a legal brief filed with the Texas Supreme Court on Friday, deputies for Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton argued the high court should reverse that appellate decision and rule in Miles’ favor because the companies fall short of the Texas Constitution’s definition of a rail company.

“The [companies] may only make preliminary examinations and surveys of private landowners’ properties for the purpose of constructing and operating a bullet train if they are either railroad companies or interurban electric railway companies,” the state wrote in its brief. “In the State’s view, the [companies] are neither.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/texas-supreme-court-case-state-130030572.html

Property taken to build vanity walls is okay but don't build anything that helps people use less oil.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Texas Supreme Court case, state argues bullet train developer can't use eminent domain (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2021 OP
How is a "railroad company" is defined in Texas? harumph Dec 2021 #1
"OK...... Turbineguy Dec 2021 #2
Or just say it's a REALLY REALLY long baseball field... ret5hd Dec 2021 #3
I guess I'm not fully understanding something gay texan Dec 2021 #4
I am against most eminent domain including this case. marie999 Dec 2021 #5
Generally Agree ProfessorGAC Dec 2021 #6
EXACTLY! bluestarone Dec 2021 #7
Amtrak used to run a day train between Houston and Dallas back in the 1990's Trailrider1951 Dec 2021 #8

ret5hd

(20,492 posts)
3. Or just say it's a REALLY REALLY long baseball field...
Sun Dec 26, 2021, 02:29 PM
Dec 2021

they used imminent domain to build Ranger Stadium in Arlington TX.

ProfessorGAC

(65,057 posts)
6. Generally Agree
Sun Dec 26, 2021, 03:19 PM
Dec 2021

But, this is the same state that employed eminent domain to build a whole 2 miles of the stupid "impermeable" border wall.
I can't support their double dipping.

Trailrider1951

(3,414 posts)
8. Amtrak used to run a day train between Houston and Dallas back in the 1990's
Sun Dec 26, 2021, 03:34 PM
Dec 2021

I rode it on a round trip from Houston to Chicago on a business trip. Its consist included 2 coach cars and a café car (no sleepers). It left Houston about 8 or 9 am and arrived in Dallas in time to meet up with the Texas Eagle in the afternoon. One of the coach cars was removed from the Houston train and connected to the Eagle, with sleeper passengers then allowed to go to their sleeper cars. Another coach car was removed from the Eagle and connected to the Houston train for the journey back to Houston later in the evening. If I remember correctly, it also stopped in Corsicana and Bryan-College Station, and arrived back in Houston about 9 or 10 pm. Of course, it was cut when the Repub congress in the latter 1990's was so concerned about deficits and tried to starve Amtrak. Thanks, Newt! So now there is a shuttle bus that takes Houston passengers southward from Longview, and they don't get to go through Dallas.

Trivia: The Longview station has two separate waiting rooms with separate restrooms, currently used for northbound and southbound passengers. In bygone days when the station was built, the two different accommodations were to keep the races separate. Jim Crow, doncha know.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In Texas Supreme Court ca...