Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:16 AM Oct 2012

Is Anyone Else TERRIFIED That A Bishop Is Running For President?

That is the final check mark off the list of Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan, & the GOPs agenda. Looking at this list it is painstakingly clear what the RWNJs plan for America is: Theocratic-Fascism. Just like Iran. There isn't an item on this list the GOP doesn't adhere to. And NOW finally, religion & government intertwined; Bishop Romney.

80 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is Anyone Else TERRIFIED That A Bishop Is Running For President? (Original Post) JaneyVee Oct 2012 OP
Not exactly afraid; more astonished at the absolute silence in the Media on the facts. WinkyDink Oct 2012 #1
From what I have read control of mass media makes Fascism possible. gordianot Oct 2012 #8
Don't forget Rupert Murdoch, who is gobbling up mass media exponentially. JaneyVee Oct 2012 #16
True the son carrying on worries me. gordianot Oct 2012 #66
A friend of mine and I have been discussing exactly that CanonRay Oct 2012 #2
Christian conservatives should also be scared shitless. There is NO breaking the Mormon bond. JaneyVee Oct 2012 #7
I'm guilty of being an FB crude antagonist this a.m. and I don't care anymore...... nc4bo Oct 2012 #36
Religion and Politics are a deadly combination CanonRay Oct 2012 #53
Mormonism is a cult, from everything I've seen, Ilsa Oct 2012 #3
Romney's Bishop title is equivalent to Cardinal Dolan running for President. Sickening. JaneyVee Oct 2012 #5
Not quite dragonlady Oct 2012 #23
But extremely similar ideologies: JaneyVee Oct 2012 #30
Minor quibble, Romney is ordained ProgressiveProfessor Oct 2012 #48
All 12 years old boys onward in the LDS Church are ordained /t FreeState Oct 2012 #70
No, a cardinal is much higher in the catholic hierarchy than a bishop in the mormon hierarchy fishwax Oct 2012 #33
They share exact ideologies. JaneyVee Oct 2012 #37
They both do the secret handshakes and wear the funny hats. backscatter712 Oct 2012 #51
their similar ideologies don't really have much to do with Romney having once been a bishop, though fishwax Oct 2012 #52
Holy Mackerel ! Berlum Oct 2012 #4
K & R. And this tools acts like he knows he has it in the bag. This is so frightening. chimpymustgo Oct 2012 #6
That's what scares me the most. nt laundry_queen Oct 2012 #61
Were you terrified when Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson ran for President? brooklynite Oct 2012 #9
LOL- good answer dems_rightnow Oct 2012 #11
Sorry, you're arguing apples and oranges. Neither one of those individuals ever threatened.... OldDem2012 Oct 2012 #14
Please share your evidence that Romney has done so... brooklynite Oct 2012 #24
But his desire to do so is HEAVILY backed up by the RW congress who would JUMP at the idea. JaneyVee Oct 2012 #28
I repeat: show me the evidence he has the desire brooklynite Oct 2012 #32
Bull. Did you watch the video the other day? You know, the one that secretly filmed a Mormon.... OldDem2012 Oct 2012 #60
The White Horse Prophecy treestar Oct 2012 #74
Not necessarily laundry_queen Oct 2012 #63
They are not Bishops, they are Reverend's. BIG difference. And they are also Liberals, JaneyVee Oct 2012 #17
You do realize that a Mormom Bisop and a Catholic Bishop are completely different? brooklynite Oct 2012 #22
To an extent, yes. But the ideologies are about dead on. JaneyVee Oct 2012 #26
Right. And both ideologies suck mightily. Arugula Latte Oct 2012 #57
Shirley Chisolm scared me a little bit slackmaster Oct 2012 #29
Quite scared. Was just as scared when Pat Roberts made his attempt rurallib Oct 2012 #10
Go back to the attempted coup against FDR in 1933-34 by right-wing corporate interests.... OldDem2012 Oct 2012 #12
No I'm not. My faith in the Constitution isn't that frail. Bucky Oct 2012 #13
I'd agree with you if Mormonism was an actual religion and not a cult. nt. OldDem2012 Oct 2012 #15
Gee, that's not a slippery slope. Bucky Oct 2012 #69
I'm just not as ecumenical as you, I guess! I have no qualms about calling cults (Jonestown; Koresh; WinkyDink Oct 2012 #18
Bigotry? Separation of Church and State is in our Constitution. JaneyVee Oct 2012 #19
Separation of Church and State is important. That's why there should be no religious test for office Bucky Oct 2012 #72
No, no, you've read the OP all wrong, his hyper-religious beliefs are the final cherry on top JaneyVee Oct 2012 #76
"These people" helped Howard Hughes keep Kleenex boxes on his feet. gordianot Oct 2012 #20
this is Mormophobic Enrique Oct 2012 #21
Has nothing to do with Mormons. I'd be against any high ranking church official running. JaneyVee Oct 2012 #25
According to the Constitution it is too much to ask as a formal rule. onenote Oct 2012 #41
Romney has never been a high ranking LDS official n/t FreeState Oct 2012 #71
The problem is religion itself. backscatter712 Oct 2012 #49
No, I don't suffer from that particular brand of xenophobia slackmaster Oct 2012 #27
All candidates have a religion. That's why I didn't name a particular one. JaneyVee Oct 2012 #35
I agree that it's xenophobic to base a vote on religion slackmaster Oct 2012 #47
apparently, you aren't old enough to remember JanMichael Oct 2012 #40
ROFLMAO! I remember when President Kennedy was shot. slackmaster Oct 2012 #44
Cain doctrine, White Horse prophecy and the Oath of Vengeance KurtNYC Oct 2012 #42
As an Agnostic... slackmaster Oct 2012 #45
i made the same error as you aletier_v Oct 2012 #54
Yes amuse bouche Oct 2012 #31
I don't care for his religion.... occupymybrain Oct 2012 #34
Yes, I fear the Mormon church Generic Other Oct 2012 #38
I'm terrifed at the thought of Mitt Romney becoming president, but it has nothing to do onenote Oct 2012 #39
I think baptising the dead from other religions, keeping the best database of genealogy and KurtNYC Oct 2012 #43
That's at the core. They don't respect others' religions (or lack thereof). backscatter712 Oct 2012 #50
He terrifies me, but that's not the main reason why ecstatic Oct 2012 #46
we've had most of those things since forever. HiPointDem Oct 2012 #55
Folks like you would have been terrified of JFK's Catholicism in 1960. Nye Bevan Oct 2012 #56
Wrong. I remember JFK making it very clear PUBLICLY that his religion would not play a role in... OldDem2012 Oct 2012 #65
He's never said that it won't play a part. And he's an authoritarian theocrat. GoneOffShore Oct 2012 #67
Sorry, I'm not anti-religion, I'm anti-oppression. JaneyVee Oct 2012 #78
Yes. Arugula Latte Oct 2012 #58
I, for one, welcome our new overlords from planet Kolob. Erose999 Oct 2012 #59
CNN.com had an article last week titled... WhaTHellsgoingonhere Oct 2012 #62
Mormon Bishops are lay volunteers from the local congregation who serve 4 to 7 year terms hack89 Oct 2012 #64
If not they should be. GoneOffShore Oct 2012 #68
petrified--like a pillar of salt! librechik Oct 2012 #73
about being a bishop DonCoquixote Oct 2012 #75
I should add that this OP wasn't about Mormonism, it was about a Bishop being the final checkmark JaneyVee Oct 2012 #77
He might be a bishop but he's really only a right wing pawn. craigmatic Oct 2012 #79
I am worried this bishop is running. hrmjustin Oct 2012 #80

gordianot

(15,248 posts)
8. From what I have read control of mass media makes Fascism possible.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:26 AM
Oct 2012

As long as the likes of Richard Murdoch continues to gain power Fascism will ascend.

CanonRay

(14,123 posts)
2. A friend of mine and I have been discussing exactly that
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:22 AM
Oct 2012

He's scared shitless of a Mormon bishop in the White House. I think it is dangerous.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
7. Christian conservatives should also be scared shitless. There is NO breaking the Mormon bond.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:26 AM
Oct 2012

It will direct his every decision. And his strings are EASILY pulled.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
36. I'm guilty of being an FB crude antagonist this a.m. and I don't care anymore......
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:04 AM
Oct 2012
STATUS: OMG got up this morning, chilly lovely fall-ish day and 3rd thought (1st one was Thank God I'm alive/family is well! and where's the coffee?) was:

How fun would it be to have a Cage Match between the Mormons and the Evangelical Christians!!?!

Not enough popcorn in the world for that one.

Comments

African American/Fundie/Romney values voter: The Word of God needs no debate it can stand alone

My response: Well seems there are 2 religions with 2 different beliefs are vying for control of America. Heaven vs Kolob.

African American/Fundie/Romney values voter: um ok

My response:
Separation of church and state - works for all religions and all 300 million Americans!

African American/Fundie/Romney value voter: **crickets**

--------------

And so it goes..........perhaps she'll look Kolob up this morning.

CanonRay

(14,123 posts)
53. Religion and Politics are a deadly combination
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:49 AM
Oct 2012

Which is why the framers of the constitution tried very hard to keep them apart. They were the result of hundreds of years of religious bloodshed. Good on you for being an antagonist.

Ilsa

(61,709 posts)
3. Mormonism is a cult, from everything I've seen,
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:23 AM
Oct 2012

but religious fundamentalists have temporarily embraced it, which is sickening.

There are websites with testimonials from ex-Mormons. Very interesting reads.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
5. Romney's Bishop title is equivalent to Cardinal Dolan running for President. Sickening.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:25 AM
Oct 2012

I'd vote for Jim Jones before before I'd ever vote for Mitt Romney.

dragonlady

(3,577 posts)
23. Not quite
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:51 AM
Oct 2012

In the LDS church a bishop is the leader of a local congregation, like a pastor but as a lay person, not ordained. The LDS bishop is not part of the official church hierarchy like a Roman Catholic bishop. (I learned this when I did genealogy research at an LDS center.) Romney is obviously very influential in the Mormon church, but not just because he was a bishop.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
30. But extremely similar ideologies:
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:00 AM
Oct 2012

From the church website:

"Church leaders have said that some exceptional circumstances may justify an abortion, such as when pregnancy is the result of incest or rape, But even these circumstances do not automatically justify an abortion".

fishwax

(29,149 posts)
33. No, a cardinal is much higher in the catholic hierarchy than a bishop in the mormon hierarchy
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:01 AM
Oct 2012

A mormon bishop is roughly similar to a parish priest, with one bishop for each congregation (ward). Of course, there are numerous differences as well, such as that the position of bishop is temporary (mittens was a bishop, but is no longer).

Romney was also a stake president, though, which is a position of greater authority than his position as a bishop. A stake president oversees a stake, which is a collection of wards. (Stake presidents also serve for a longer period of time than bishops do.)

None of this changes the fact that Romney would be a horrible choice for president, or even that his positions of religious authority have been strangely overlooked in the national discussion. But it isn't equivalent to a cardinal running, for the record.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
37. They share exact ideologies.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:08 AM
Oct 2012

Oops, I actually meant Bishop Dolan and wrote Cardinal. Being from NY I'm so used to hearing Bishop Dolan.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
51. They both do the secret handshakes and wear the funny hats.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:33 AM
Oct 2012

I wonder how much of rMoney's behavior is driven by belief in the White Horse Prophecy...

fishwax

(29,149 posts)
52. their similar ideologies don't really have much to do with Romney having once been a bishop, though
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:42 AM
Oct 2012

brooklynite

(94,808 posts)
9. Were you terrified when Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson ran for President?
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:30 AM
Oct 2012

I don't have a lot of respect for religious leaders of any stripe, but "terrified of a theocracy" is something of a stretch.

OldDem2012

(3,526 posts)
14. Sorry, you're arguing apples and oranges. Neither one of those individuals ever threatened....
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:37 AM
Oct 2012

...to replace our current civil government with a faith-based government.

brooklynite

(94,808 posts)
24. Please share your evidence that Romney has done so...
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:52 AM
Oct 2012

There are plenty of things to worry about with Romney. The desire to impose a theocracy isn't one of them.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
28. But his desire to do so is HEAVILY backed up by the RW congress who would JUMP at the idea.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:58 AM
Oct 2012

Starting with overturning Roe v Wade.

brooklynite

(94,808 posts)
32. I repeat: show me the evidence he has the desire
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:01 AM
Oct 2012

Getting into the weeds about presumed theocratic tendances is actually a dangerous distraction when there are plenty of stated economic and foreign policy positions to challenge him on. This is like our FRiends getting so fixated on Rev Wright four years ago.

OldDem2012

(3,526 posts)
60. Bull. Did you watch the video the other day? You know, the one that secretly filmed a Mormon....
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:06 PM
Oct 2012

...ceremony? Yes or no?

Do you recall the subtext that very clearly stated that one of the goals of the Mormon organization was to replace the US civil government with a religious one headed by Mormons? Yes or no?

Romney was, and probably still is, a high-ranking official within the Mormon organization. Is it not logical to believe that he not only supports the goal stated above but also taught it to others? Yes or no?

Is that enough "evidence" for you, or do you need a written statement from Romney himself? Yes or no?

Additionally, none of us are stupid people as you seem to imply. Please stop attempting to belittle us by implying that we're not capable of focusing on more than one issue at a time. Just my opinion, but I strongly believe we're more than capable of discussing the details of this issue, among others, and STILL voting for the President on Election Day.

Got anything else to say or are we done?

treestar

(82,383 posts)
74. The White Horse Prophecy
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 05:49 PM
Oct 2012

He doesn't have to come out and say it. According to his religion, it's going to take over America.

That does not mean he would necessarily succeed. But it is something he believes.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
63. Not necessarily
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:11 PM
Oct 2012

Part of the Mormon doctrine is to install one of their own as President. I don't think that's doctrine in Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson's religion and even if it were, their party believes in separation of church and state. Rmoney's party - not so much.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
17. They are not Bishops, they are Reverend's. BIG difference. And they are also Liberals,
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:45 AM
Oct 2012

which means their faith is one of lifting all boats. Romney's is sink all ships. Ideology is apples and oranges.

rurallib

(62,468 posts)
10. Quite scared. Was just as scared when Pat Roberts made his attempt
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:31 AM
Oct 2012

but the fact that Romney is so close is absolutely frightening.

OldDem2012

(3,526 posts)
12. Go back to the attempted coup against FDR in 1933-34 by right-wing corporate interests....
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:32 AM
Oct 2012

...this kind of right-wing activity has been going on for a LONG time through a variety of means.

Wall Street's Plot to Seize the White House: Facing the Corporate Roots of American Fascism

QUOTE:

Although Butler's patriotic efforts did thwart this fascist coup plot, the Wall Street bankers and corporate leaders who sponsored it continued to conspire behind the scenes to rid America of FDR and to smash his “New Deal.” Evidence of continued efforts by powerful U.S. fascists to regain control of the White House is illustrated by a 1936 statement by William Dodd, the U.S. Ambassador to Germany. In a letter to Roosevelt, he stated:

“A clique of U.S. industrialists is hell-bent to bring a fascist state to supplant our democratic government and is working closely with the fascist regime in Germany and Italy. I have had plenty of opportunity in my post in Berlin to witness how close some of our American ruling families are to the Nazi regime.... A prominent executive of one of the largest corporations, told me point blank that he would be ready to take definite action to bring fascism into America if President Roosevelt continued his progressive policies. Certain American industrialists had a great deal to do with bringing fascist regimes into being in both Germany and Italy. They extended aid to help Fascism occupy the seat of power, and they are helping to keep it there. Propagandists for fascist groups try to dismiss the fascist scare. We should be aware of the symptoms. When industrialists ignore laws designed for social and economic progress they will seek recourse to a fascist state when the institutions of our government compel them to comply with the provisions.”

Many of the plotters exposed by Butler, had been boosting their fortunes by investing in the fascist experiments of Mussolini and Hitler. Some of them even amassed great profits by arming the Nazis, both before and during WWII.


Yes, the current version of these right-wingers are VERY disturbing to me.

Bucky

(54,087 posts)
13. No I'm not. My faith in the Constitution isn't that frail.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:33 AM
Oct 2012

You need to work on your dog-whistle; right now you're too easy to hear.

Democrats harping on the religion angle is so embarrassing to those of us who are actually liberal, and not just tribally anti-Republican. It's a sad day when we start trying to gin up enthusiasm for our side by using religious bigotry. I'm grateful, however, that such bigotry is a small irrelevent minority of the party. But that doesn't make your views any less bigoted.

Bucky

(54,087 posts)
69. Gee, that's not a slippery slope.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 05:35 PM
Oct 2012

Who gets to decide the dividing line between cult and religion? Surely you know there are DUers who think all religions are brain-washers.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
18. I'm just not as ecumenical as you, I guess! I have no qualms about calling cults (Jonestown; Koresh;
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:47 AM
Oct 2012

Heaven's Gate; etc.) "cults." And I extend that to a 19th Century flim-flam man named Joseph Smith. Yes, yes; "magic virgin birth, blah, blah, blah." It's just not as easy to countenance a so-called religion born post-Enlightenment, especially in THE nation based UPON Enlightenment principles.

I shall nonetheless cast my illiberal, tribal vote for Obama.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
19. Bigotry? Separation of Church and State is in our Constitution.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:48 AM
Oct 2012

The only thing I'm bigoted against is OPPRESSION. Yes, I'm intolerant to intolerance. I'm guessing you're a male and will be minimally affected by the overturn of Roe v Wade and other war on women tactics. Not me.

Bucky

(54,087 posts)
72. Separation of Church and State is important. That's why there should be no religious test for office
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 05:45 PM
Oct 2012

And yet the argument that you're making is rooted in someone's religion because you happen to disapprove of that particular religion. I'd wager you'd lose your anti-Mormon biases if the Democrats had nominated Harry Reid or one of the Udalls for president.

As someone who takes seriously the idea that religion and politics don't mix (a liberal opinion I share with the Framers of the Constitution) I gotta cry foul when I hear a fellow Dem making religion-based arguments against a political candidate. Let's judge Mitt on his (lack of) character and (lack of) qualitifications, rather than on his demographics. You get to the same conclusion and you'll end up feeling less prejudiced.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
76. No, no, you've read the OP all wrong, his hyper-religious beliefs are the final cherry on top
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 08:09 PM
Oct 2012

of the Fascist cake. Their list is now complete.

gordianot

(15,248 posts)
20. "These people" helped Howard Hughes keep Kleenex boxes on his feet.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:48 AM
Oct 2012

I read a book and couple articles circa 1960's and 1970's and have been creeped out ever since but not to the point of obsession. There was also an eradication order for Mormons in our State so not a lot of personal experience with Mormons. As a proud member of the recently identified "you people" tribe I will continue to be creeped out. Wonder if Conan Doyle was on to something but he also believed in fairies?

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
21. this is Mormophobic
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:50 AM
Oct 2012

literally.

Scary Mormons.

This post is reminds me of history class where we laughed at the anti-Catholic propaganda from the past, when we didn't know any better.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
25. Has nothing to do with Mormons. I'd be against any high ranking church official running.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:53 AM
Oct 2012

I'm a half-Jew and I wouldn't vote for a Rabbi either. Is it too much to ask that our elected officials put their constituents needs and priorities ahead of their own personal beliefs?

onenote

(42,796 posts)
41. According to the Constitution it is too much to ask as a formal rule.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:19 AM
Oct 2012

Now, if you want to make decisions about voting based on religion, or race, or the candidate's name, or the sports teams' they support, or what color ties they wear, you're absolutely free to do so. But insofar as you are suggesting that there be some formal religious (or un-religious) standard for elected officials (and maybe you're not going that far), that's a no-no.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
49. The problem is religion itself.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:43 AM
Oct 2012

People believe in magical imaginary sky-daddies instead of grounding themselves in reality, wear such beliefs on their sleeves in public, and bring them into elected positions. Get them into government, the result is always madness. Add another level of madness by bringing in unscrupulous psychopaths who manipulate people using their religion, and that's when people start actively oppressing and killing each other over which magical sky-being has the biggest dick.

Whether it's Mormons wearing magic underwear and doing secret handshakes, Christians engaging in ritual cannibalism of their deity, or some other religion, it's all batshit.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
27. No, I don't suffer from that particular brand of xenophobia
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:56 AM
Oct 2012

A candidate's religion is about as important to me as his or her race.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
35. All candidates have a religion. That's why I didn't name a particular one.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:03 AM
Oct 2012

And I believe the xenophobes are the ones who vote solely based on religion, like Christian conservatives do.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
47. I agree that it's xenophobic to base a vote on religion
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:32 AM
Oct 2012

Every Presidential candidate that I have ever voted for, and every Presidential candidate that I have not voted for, had a different spirituality than I did.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
44. ROFLMAO! I remember when President Kennedy was shot.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:28 AM
Oct 2012

I wasn't afraid of the Moral Majority either, because I knew they were neither moral nor a majority.

I'll bet you aren't old enough to remember the John Birch Society.

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
42. Cain doctrine, White Horse prophecy and the Oath of Vengeance
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:19 AM
Oct 2012

Baptizing the dead into Mormonism

They don't respect your religion (or spirituality).

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
45. As an Agnostic...
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:30 AM
Oct 2012

...I don't care.

Baptizing the dead into Mormonism

I believe that dead people don't care, because they are dead.

aletier_v

(1,773 posts)
54. i made the same error as you
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:51 AM
Oct 2012

its not if their religion matters to YOU.

its about how it matters to THEM.

occupymybrain

(74 posts)
34. I don't care for his religion....
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:02 AM
Oct 2012

that said I don't care for any religion at all. No doubt Romney has a view that is not normal. I don't see the difference between Romney and main stream religion. To me it's all nonsense. I could never vote for a hyper religious person. I'm not saying that i don't think that people have the right to practice what they want, they do have that right. I don't have to vote for them though, that is my right.
I end with a question.
When was the last time a religious prophecy came true?

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
38. Yes, I fear the Mormon church
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:09 AM
Oct 2012

because of their history of excluding those who do not follow their ways. Romney should be asked tough questions about what effect the church's influence would have on his administration.

Certainly, when you are a bishop in a church, you cannot easily separate church and state. This conversation needs to happen in this country, but since the evangelicals have decided that Romney is one of them (Billy Graham now says Mormonism is not a cult), it won't.

onenote

(42,796 posts)
39. I'm terrifed at the thought of Mitt Romney becoming president, but it has nothing to do
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:15 AM
Oct 2012

with his religion.

First, bishops in the mormon church serve for limited terms and are essentially glorified versions of deacons. Jimmy Carter was a deacon in his church and that didn't terrify me. Jesse Jackson was an ordained minister in his church and that didn't terrify me. Other candidates for President have been devout members of their faith to varying degrees and that hasn't concerned me either. The Constitution says there is no religious test for holding office and consistent with that principle, I separate out a candidates religious beliefs and practices from his or her positions on issues, their character, etc etc.

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
43. I think baptising the dead from other religions, keeping the best database of genealogy and
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:23 AM
Oct 2012

funding Proposition 8 are all bad signs. It shows they don't respect other people's spirituality and they act upon that disrespect.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
50. That's at the core. They don't respect others' religions (or lack thereof).
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:30 AM
Oct 2012

Also see their constant door-to-door proselytization, their secrecy and their efforts to distance themselves from non-believers.

They have one of the most toxic religious beliefs of all: "My religion is absolutely right, everyone else's is wrong." Their entire culture is one that others anyone who doesn't believe in the correct deity, pays the tithes to the correct religious organization and knows the secret handshakes.

If you're not Mormon, you're a second-class person in their eyes, and they feel justified in Lying for the Lord to get their way from you.

ecstatic

(32,755 posts)
46. He terrifies me, but that's not the main reason why
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:32 AM
Oct 2012

He's a simple minded corporatist with no vision or ideas other than to rape and plunder other peoples' resources.

OldDem2012

(3,526 posts)
65. Wrong. I remember JFK making it very clear PUBLICLY that his religion would not play a role in...
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:21 PM
Oct 2012

...how he governed as President. Yes, there were concerns about whether or not he would allow his religion to affect his political decisions, but for most Americans his public statement disavowing that was enough. I also do not recall any decision he made as President that hinted of any Catholic input.

Additionally, unlike the Mormon organization, the Catholic Church has never stated that one of their goals was the overthrow of the US Government and replacing it with a religious-based government headed by Catholics.

Has Mitt ever made any kind of PUBLIC statement disavowing the above-stated goal of the Mormons? Not that I've seen.

GoneOffShore

(17,342 posts)
67. He's never said that it won't play a part. And he's an authoritarian theocrat.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:38 PM
Oct 2012

But you just can't tell some people that the religious want to put them in re-education camps or eliminate them altogether.

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
62. CNN.com had an article last week titled...
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:10 PM
Oct 2012

...Is Obama the wrong kind of Christian?

It never mentioned that Mitt may be one because he's a Mormon Bishop!!

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
75. about being a bishop
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 07:56 PM
Oct 2012

Mitt Romney was in charge of the mormon church od Boston. Granted, there are not as many Mormons in Boston as let's say, Catholics, but the bttom line is that he was in charge of Boston, just as a catholic Bishop is in charge of Boston (though large cities are called archdioceses by Catholics.)

I bring this up because when people say "the bishop was a title", in his case, it is not, he built churches, hired clergy, fired clergy. There is even a case where he tired to buck his superior to prevent a woman whoe pregnancy threatened her life. The higher ups read the medical file, gave the ok, Mitt did not.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
77. I should add that this OP wasn't about Mormonism, it was about a Bishop being the final checkmark
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 08:15 PM
Oct 2012

off the list of GOP Fascism. That's it. They've attained a completely Theocratic-Fascist platform. This could be any religion where the President would be more guided by religious beliefs and policies than his/her desire to solve problems.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is Anyone Else TERRIFIED ...