General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs Anyone Else TERRIFIED That A Bishop Is Running For President?
That is the final check mark off the list of Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan, & the GOPs agenda. Looking at this list it is painstakingly clear what the RWNJs plan for America is: Theocratic-Fascism. Just like Iran. There isn't an item on this list the GOP doesn't adhere to. And NOW finally, religion & government intertwined; Bishop Romney.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)gordianot
(15,248 posts)As long as the likes of Richard Murdoch continues to gain power Fascism will ascend.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)gordianot
(15,248 posts)CanonRay
(14,123 posts)He's scared shitless of a Mormon bishop in the White House. I think it is dangerous.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)It will direct his every decision. And his strings are EASILY pulled.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)How fun would it be to have a Cage Match between the Mormons and the Evangelical Christians!!?!
Not enough popcorn in the world for that one.
Comments
African American/Fundie/Romney values voter: The Word of God needs no debate it can stand alone
My response: Well seems there are 2 religions with 2 different beliefs are vying for control of America. Heaven vs Kolob.
African American/Fundie/Romney values voter: um ok
My response: Separation of church and state - works for all religions and all 300 million Americans!
African American/Fundie/Romney value voter: **crickets**
--------------
And so it goes..........perhaps she'll look Kolob up this morning.
CanonRay
(14,123 posts)Which is why the framers of the constitution tried very hard to keep them apart. They were the result of hundreds of years of religious bloodshed. Good on you for being an antagonist.
Ilsa
(61,709 posts)but religious fundamentalists have temporarily embraced it, which is sickening.
There are websites with testimonials from ex-Mormons. Very interesting reads.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)I'd vote for Jim Jones before before I'd ever vote for Mitt Romney.
dragonlady
(3,577 posts)In the LDS church a bishop is the leader of a local congregation, like a pastor but as a lay person, not ordained. The LDS bishop is not part of the official church hierarchy like a Roman Catholic bishop. (I learned this when I did genealogy research at an LDS center.) Romney is obviously very influential in the Mormon church, but not just because he was a bishop.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)From the church website:
"Church leaders have said that some exceptional circumstances may justify an abortion, such as when pregnancy is the result of incest or rape, But even these circumstances do not automatically justify an abortion".
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)LDS does not require the divinity school gig.
FreeState
(10,585 posts)fishwax
(29,149 posts)A mormon bishop is roughly similar to a parish priest, with one bishop for each congregation (ward). Of course, there are numerous differences as well, such as that the position of bishop is temporary (mittens was a bishop, but is no longer).
Romney was also a stake president, though, which is a position of greater authority than his position as a bishop. A stake president oversees a stake, which is a collection of wards. (Stake presidents also serve for a longer period of time than bishops do.)
None of this changes the fact that Romney would be a horrible choice for president, or even that his positions of religious authority have been strangely overlooked in the national discussion. But it isn't equivalent to a cardinal running, for the record.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Oops, I actually meant Bishop Dolan and wrote Cardinal. Being from NY I'm so used to hearing Bishop Dolan.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)I wonder how much of rMoney's behavior is driven by belief in the White Horse Prophecy...
fishwax
(29,149 posts)Berlum
(7,044 posts)chimpymustgo
(12,774 posts)Does he?
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)brooklynite
(94,808 posts)I don't have a lot of respect for religious leaders of any stripe, but "terrified of a theocracy" is something of a stretch.
dems_rightnow
(1,956 posts)So MANY reasons to be terrified of Romney. But this one is not on my radar.
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)...to replace our current civil government with a faith-based government.
brooklynite
(94,808 posts)There are plenty of things to worry about with Romney. The desire to impose a theocracy isn't one of them.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Starting with overturning Roe v Wade.
brooklynite
(94,808 posts)Getting into the weeds about presumed theocratic tendances is actually a dangerous distraction when there are plenty of stated economic and foreign policy positions to challenge him on. This is like our FRiends getting so fixated on Rev Wright four years ago.
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)...ceremony? Yes or no?
Do you recall the subtext that very clearly stated that one of the goals of the Mormon organization was to replace the US civil government with a religious one headed by Mormons? Yes or no?
Romney was, and probably still is, a high-ranking official within the Mormon organization. Is it not logical to believe that he not only supports the goal stated above but also taught it to others? Yes or no?
Is that enough "evidence" for you, or do you need a written statement from Romney himself? Yes or no?
Additionally, none of us are stupid people as you seem to imply. Please stop attempting to belittle us by implying that we're not capable of focusing on more than one issue at a time. Just my opinion, but I strongly believe we're more than capable of discussing the details of this issue, among others, and STILL voting for the President on Election Day.
Got anything else to say or are we done?
treestar
(82,383 posts)He doesn't have to come out and say it. According to his religion, it's going to take over America.
That does not mean he would necessarily succeed. But it is something he believes.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)Part of the Mormon doctrine is to install one of their own as President. I don't think that's doctrine in Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson's religion and even if it were, their party believes in separation of church and state. Rmoney's party - not so much.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)which means their faith is one of lifting all boats. Romney's is sink all ships. Ideology is apples and oranges.
brooklynite
(94,808 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)But I got over it and voted for McCarthy.
rurallib
(62,468 posts)but the fact that Romney is so close is absolutely frightening.
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)...this kind of right-wing activity has been going on for a LONG time through a variety of means.
Wall Street's Plot to Seize the White House: Facing the Corporate Roots of American Fascism
QUOTE:
Although Butler's patriotic efforts did thwart this fascist coup plot, the Wall Street bankers and corporate leaders who sponsored it continued to conspire behind the scenes to rid America of FDR and to smash his New Deal. Evidence of continued efforts by powerful U.S. fascists to regain control of the White House is illustrated by a 1936 statement by William Dodd, the U.S. Ambassador to Germany. In a letter to Roosevelt, he stated:
A clique of U.S. industrialists is hell-bent to bring a fascist state to supplant our democratic government and is working closely with the fascist regime in Germany and Italy. I have had plenty of opportunity in my post in Berlin to witness how close some of our American ruling families are to the Nazi regime.... A prominent executive of one of the largest corporations, told me point blank that he would be ready to take definite action to bring fascism into America if President Roosevelt continued his progressive policies. Certain American industrialists had a great deal to do with bringing fascist regimes into being in both Germany and Italy. They extended aid to help Fascism occupy the seat of power, and they are helping to keep it there. Propagandists for fascist groups try to dismiss the fascist scare. We should be aware of the symptoms. When industrialists ignore laws designed for social and economic progress they will seek recourse to a fascist state when the institutions of our government compel them to comply with the provisions.
Many of the plotters exposed by Butler, had been boosting their fortunes by investing in the fascist experiments of Mussolini and Hitler. Some of them even amassed great profits by arming the Nazis, both before and during WWII.
Yes, the current version of these right-wingers are VERY disturbing to me.
Bucky
(54,087 posts)You need to work on your dog-whistle; right now you're too easy to hear.
Democrats harping on the religion angle is so embarrassing to those of us who are actually liberal, and not just tribally anti-Republican. It's a sad day when we start trying to gin up enthusiasm for our side by using religious bigotry. I'm grateful, however, that such bigotry is a small irrelevent minority of the party. But that doesn't make your views any less bigoted.
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)Bucky
(54,087 posts)Who gets to decide the dividing line between cult and religion? Surely you know there are DUers who think all religions are brain-washers.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Heaven's Gate; etc.) "cults." And I extend that to a 19th Century flim-flam man named Joseph Smith. Yes, yes; "magic virgin birth, blah, blah, blah." It's just not as easy to countenance a so-called religion born post-Enlightenment, especially in THE nation based UPON Enlightenment principles.
I shall nonetheless cast my illiberal, tribal vote for Obama.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)The only thing I'm bigoted against is OPPRESSION. Yes, I'm intolerant to intolerance. I'm guessing you're a male and will be minimally affected by the overturn of Roe v Wade and other war on women tactics. Not me.
Bucky
(54,087 posts)And yet the argument that you're making is rooted in someone's religion because you happen to disapprove of that particular religion. I'd wager you'd lose your anti-Mormon biases if the Democrats had nominated Harry Reid or one of the Udalls for president.
As someone who takes seriously the idea that religion and politics don't mix (a liberal opinion I share with the Framers of the Constitution) I gotta cry foul when I hear a fellow Dem making religion-based arguments against a political candidate. Let's judge Mitt on his (lack of) character and (lack of) qualitifications, rather than on his demographics. You get to the same conclusion and you'll end up feeling less prejudiced.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)of the Fascist cake. Their list is now complete.
gordianot
(15,248 posts)I read a book and couple articles circa 1960's and 1970's and have been creeped out ever since but not to the point of obsession. There was also an eradication order for Mormons in our State so not a lot of personal experience with Mormons. As a proud member of the recently identified "you people" tribe I will continue to be creeped out. Wonder if Conan Doyle was on to something but he also believed in fairies?
Enrique
(27,461 posts)literally.
Scary Mormons.
This post is reminds me of history class where we laughed at the anti-Catholic propaganda from the past, when we didn't know any better.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)I'm a half-Jew and I wouldn't vote for a Rabbi either. Is it too much to ask that our elected officials put their constituents needs and priorities ahead of their own personal beliefs?
onenote
(42,796 posts)Now, if you want to make decisions about voting based on religion, or race, or the candidate's name, or the sports teams' they support, or what color ties they wear, you're absolutely free to do so. But insofar as you are suggesting that there be some formal religious (or un-religious) standard for elected officials (and maybe you're not going that far), that's a no-no.
FreeState
(10,585 posts)backscatter712
(26,355 posts)People believe in magical imaginary sky-daddies instead of grounding themselves in reality, wear such beliefs on their sleeves in public, and bring them into elected positions. Get them into government, the result is always madness. Add another level of madness by bringing in unscrupulous psychopaths who manipulate people using their religion, and that's when people start actively oppressing and killing each other over which magical sky-being has the biggest dick.
Whether it's Mormons wearing magic underwear and doing secret handshakes, Christians engaging in ritual cannibalism of their deity, or some other religion, it's all batshit.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)A candidate's religion is about as important to me as his or her race.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)And I believe the xenophobes are the ones who vote solely based on religion, like Christian conservatives do.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Every Presidential candidate that I have ever voted for, and every Presidential candidate that I have not voted for, had a different spirituality than I did.
JanMichael
(24,897 posts)the Moral Majority, then.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)I wasn't afraid of the Moral Majority either, because I knew they were neither moral nor a majority.
I'll bet you aren't old enough to remember the John Birch Society.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)Baptizing the dead into Mormonism
They don't respect your religion (or spirituality).
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)...I don't care.
Baptizing the dead into Mormonism
I believe that dead people don't care, because they are dead.
aletier_v
(1,773 posts)its not if their religion matters to YOU.
its about how it matters to THEM.
amuse bouche
(3,657 posts)And this creepy secretive religion is never mentioned by the media.
occupymybrain
(74 posts)that said I don't care for any religion at all. No doubt Romney has a view that is not normal. I don't see the difference between Romney and main stream religion. To me it's all nonsense. I could never vote for a hyper religious person. I'm not saying that i don't think that people have the right to practice what they want, they do have that right. I don't have to vote for them though, that is my right.
I end with a question.
When was the last time a religious prophecy came true?
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)because of their history of excluding those who do not follow their ways. Romney should be asked tough questions about what effect the church's influence would have on his administration.
Certainly, when you are a bishop in a church, you cannot easily separate church and state. This conversation needs to happen in this country, but since the evangelicals have decided that Romney is one of them (Billy Graham now says Mormonism is not a cult), it won't.
onenote
(42,796 posts)with his religion.
First, bishops in the mormon church serve for limited terms and are essentially glorified versions of deacons. Jimmy Carter was a deacon in his church and that didn't terrify me. Jesse Jackson was an ordained minister in his church and that didn't terrify me. Other candidates for President have been devout members of their faith to varying degrees and that hasn't concerned me either. The Constitution says there is no religious test for holding office and consistent with that principle, I separate out a candidates religious beliefs and practices from his or her positions on issues, their character, etc etc.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)funding Proposition 8 are all bad signs. It shows they don't respect other people's spirituality and they act upon that disrespect.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Also see their constant door-to-door proselytization, their secrecy and their efforts to distance themselves from non-believers.
They have one of the most toxic religious beliefs of all: "My religion is absolutely right, everyone else's is wrong." Their entire culture is one that others anyone who doesn't believe in the correct deity, pays the tithes to the correct religious organization and knows the secret handshakes.
If you're not Mormon, you're a second-class person in their eyes, and they feel justified in Lying for the Lord to get their way from you.
ecstatic
(32,755 posts)He's a simple minded corporatist with no vision or ideas other than to rape and plunder other peoples' resources.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Try not to be so fearful.
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)...how he governed as President. Yes, there were concerns about whether or not he would allow his religion to affect his political decisions, but for most Americans his public statement disavowing that was enough. I also do not recall any decision he made as President that hinted of any Catholic input.
Additionally, unlike the Mormon organization, the Catholic Church has never stated that one of their goals was the overthrow of the US Government and replacing it with a religious-based government headed by Catholics.
Has Mitt ever made any kind of PUBLIC statement disavowing the above-stated goal of the Mormons? Not that I've seen.
GoneOffShore
(17,342 posts)But you just can't tell some people that the religious want to put them in re-education camps or eliminate them altogether.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Religious nuts of all stripes scare the hell out of me.
Erose999
(5,624 posts)WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)...Is Obama the wrong kind of Christian?
It never mentioned that Mitt may be one because he's a Mormon Bishop!!
hack89
(39,171 posts)GoneOffShore
(17,342 posts)librechik
(30,677 posts)How dare I look back to The Temple! God will smite me!
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)Mitt Romney was in charge of the mormon church od Boston. Granted, there are not as many Mormons in Boston as let's say, Catholics, but the bttom line is that he was in charge of Boston, just as a catholic Bishop is in charge of Boston (though large cities are called archdioceses by Catholics.)
I bring this up because when people say "the bishop was a title", in his case, it is not, he built churches, hired clergy, fired clergy. There is even a case where he tired to buck his superior to prevent a woman whoe pregnancy threatened her life. The higher ups read the medical file, gave the ok, Mitt did not.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)off the list of GOP Fascism. That's it. They've attained a completely Theocratic-Fascist platform. This could be any religion where the President would be more guided by religious beliefs and policies than his/her desire to solve problems.
craigmatic
(4,510 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)If a progressive member of the clergy ran I would love it.