Will FOX "News" Channel continue to be as reactionary after

[no_hypocrisy]

Rupert Murdoch dies? Will it depend on advertising or upon rhetoric?

[brooklynite]

1. Rupert doesn't run Fox News. His son does.

[Ocelot II]

2. Depends on whether being reactionary keeps bringing in the money.

[ShazamIam]

3. Look up stories about the split in Murdoch empire between the two sons, on has the news operation,

and or other interests go to the other or something along those lines.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/nils-pratley-on-finance/2017/dec/14/retreat-of-the-rupert-murdoch-media-empire-is-a-stunning-reversal

https://www.businessinsider.com/meet-the-murdoch-family-rupert-murdochs-media-empire-heirs-2020-8

I am curious about why no action from FCC regarding their support for Putin, who engages in running attacks against the U.S. government and its interests.

Somehow not equivalent to all the weird publications, broadcasts and internet actions of lesser organizations. Some of whom have been investigated.

[Ocelot II]

5. The FCC doesn't regulate content, and barely regulates cable at all.

[ShazamIam]

6. They once regulated content and still can I don't know about cable, that would/will probably

has or will require some action in Congress.

[bucolic_frolic]

4. Large media channels should be pick and choose

I understand we want 1A free speech, but cable bundles support media oligopoly more than they support opinion diversity and startup innovation. The big ones could all take a financial hit and we'd be better off for it.