Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gabeana

(3,170 posts)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:13 PM Oct 2012

I don't understand why Romney would double down on this

but more power to him

Mitt Romney's campaign confirmed that he still supports Richard Mourdock and has not asked Mourdock's campaign to pull the ad Romney made in support of his Senate candidacy


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/23/mitt-romney-richard-mourdock_n_2007559.html

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I don't understand why Romney would double down on this (Original Post) gabeana Oct 2012 OP
K&R tk2kewl Oct 2012 #1
He wants the militant anti-choice vote. madaboutharry Oct 2012 #2
He can have it. The evangelical south is already his. democrat_patriot Oct 2012 #4
Nobody outside their bubble has yet Flashmann Oct 2012 #3
Romnesia ProSense Oct 2012 #5
Willard is rich. He is privileged, he hates being corrected rustydog Oct 2012 #6
Sheer political calculation. But I think that since Mittens stands by TwilightGardener Oct 2012 #7
It's simple. At this point they think Mourdock can still win. They think Akin can't. DefenseLawyer Oct 2012 #8
All hands on deck to minimize damage in Congress since Romney ship is going down soleft Oct 2012 #9
Correct (I think) WinTwins Oct 2012 #11
Because the GOP does not consider women human ProfessionalLeftist Oct 2012 #10

democrat_patriot

(2,774 posts)
4. He can have it. The evangelical south is already his.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:16 PM
Oct 2012

Was he worried if he bailed on Mourdock it would hurt him in Indiana?

Even Pence walked away.

Flashmann

(2,140 posts)
3. Nobody outside their bubble has yet
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:16 PM
Oct 2012

Told those inside that this might be a bad thing....Those inside the bubble,most especially willard himself,are incapable of reasoning through to this conclusion......

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
5. Romnesia
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:17 PM
Oct 2012

Give it another few hours, he'll say he didn't mean it

Mitt tries to distance himself from Mourdock's rape comment after starring
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021621280

rustydog

(9,186 posts)
6. Willard is rich. He is privileged, he hates being corrected
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:21 PM
Oct 2012

He hates being shown to be wrong by those lesser than him...

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
7. Sheer political calculation. But I think that since Mittens stands by
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:23 PM
Oct 2012

his endorsement of a sick man who says God wants rape to happen, then we should make him OWN that endorsement.

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
8. It's simple. At this point they think Mourdock can still win. They think Akin can't.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:26 PM
Oct 2012

The calculation begins and ends there.

WinTwins

(13 posts)
11. Correct (I think)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:58 PM
Oct 2012

My working hypothesis is that Romney has already been told by his campaign that he lost. He knew he was at the brink of losing during the last debate, thus his flop sweat. The second debate was Romney's Hail-Mary pass. Pass incomplete. We was unable to sway the demographics he needed. Early voting, especially in key counties and districts, combined with the Obama's Mamouth GOTV efforts have closed Romney's Electoral College path. Everything we see from Romney is Kabuki theatre to maintain Republican enthusiasm. I believe the polls will reflect that in the next few days, and beginning to show Obama's momentum now. I don't believe Ohio will decide this race, only because the polls close in NC and Virginia first. Romney was never really ahead in this race beyond some opinion polls, and time has run out for him to catch up.

Stay scared and maybe we can get Congress, too. Cheers.

ProfessionalLeftist

(4,982 posts)
10. Because the GOP does not consider women human
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:54 PM
Oct 2012

If you think about it, that attitude is behind many of these outrageous statements. Not at all acceptable but certainly explains it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I don't understand why Ro...