General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums2 lawyers arguing Biden's mandate will have to do it remotely after testing positive!
https://www.businessinsider.com/lawyers-supreme-court-biden-vaccine-mandate-positive-covid-19-2022-1SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Last edited Sat Jan 8, 2022, 08:06 AM - Edit history (1)
madville
(7,413 posts)Its like a double negative, or double positive in this case I guess.
3Hotdogs
(12,467 posts)Sorry, Mr. S.G., you're not allowed in.
gab13by13
(21,508 posts)You can take that to the bank, at least based on their arguments.
The fascist court allowed Trump to ban Muslims entry into our country on the grounds that it is the president's responsibility to protect Americans from harm, except when that harm comes from a virus I guess. What bought and paid for hypocrites.
Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)and the vast majority of not faux addled folks working for these businesses r imposing their own mandates as well.
Faux News has a very clear mandate, in example.
As far as federal mandate on federal employees
the military is the biggest isnt it?
Why is that not being challenged on some flat earth world logic?
jimfields33
(16,145 posts)When a proposal at work is discussed. The good bad and ugly is discussed and a decision is made. Many negatives are discussed but are not a negative result at the end.
quakerboy
(13,924 posts)on the court are not actually participating in good faith. And the chief justice isn't either, but still cares about appearances.
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)Maru Kitteh
(28,348 posts)🤣