Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MissMillie

(38,559 posts)
Mon Jan 10, 2022, 01:47 PM Jan 2022

North Carolina voters file suit to disqualify Cawthorn from running for reelection

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/north-carolina-voters-file-suit-to-disqualify-cawthorn-from-running-for-reelection/ar-AASDjl8?li=BB141NW3

A group of 11 North Carolina voters filed a legal challenge to disqualify Rep. Madison Cawthorn from running for a second term, arguing his involvement in a rally preceding the Jan. 6, 2021, riot on Capitol Hill constitutionally bars him from waging another campaign.

Lawyers for the 11 voters filed the suit to the State Board of Elections, contending that Cawthorn's comments in the speech shortly preceding the insurrection violates the 14th Amendment, which states in part that no person "who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress . . . to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same."

The suit goes on to claim that the mob that stormed the Capitol last year in an unsuccessful attempt to halt the certification of the 2020 presidential race results "amounted to an insurrection."


*******************************

It probably won't come to anything, but maybe it will spark some meaningful discussions.



13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
North Carolina voters file suit to disqualify Cawthorn from running for reelection (Original Post) MissMillie Jan 2022 OP
It is clearly spelled out in the 14th amendment. PortTack Jan 2022 #1
Interesting to watch here in NC. blm Jan 2022 #2
If a republican did this Turbineguy Jan 2022 #3
in this case, this is not a dirty trick. RicROC Jan 2022 #9
I don't consider dirty-tricks admirable. We can beat this POS at the polls. Hoyt Jan 2022 #4
Watch out for Cawthorn. He's tough. He beats up rotted trees. keithbvadu2 Jan 2022 #5
He is punching a dead and rotten sapling. The Jungle 1 Jan 2022 #11
This isn't the only thing that'll make it hard for him texasfiddler Jan 2022 #6
I'll watch this JustAnotherGen Jan 2022 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author monkeyman1 Jan 2022 #8
The 14th is the hammer The Jungle 1 Jan 2022 #10
Ridiculous... brooklynite Jan 2022 #12
has he been charged? Tickle Jan 2022 #13

PortTack

(32,769 posts)
1. It is clearly spelled out in the 14th amendment.
Mon Jan 10, 2022, 01:50 PM
Jan 2022

He does have a solid dem challenger, he only won by approx 4,000 votes. A Stacey Abrams style campaign against him could send him packing

blm

(113,062 posts)
2. Interesting to watch here in NC.
Mon Jan 10, 2022, 01:51 PM
Jan 2022

Cawthorn is NOT liked or respected by most of the other elected Republicans in NC.

RicROC

(1,204 posts)
9. in this case, this is not a dirty trick.
Mon Jan 10, 2022, 04:42 PM
Jan 2022

Hawthorn violated his oath of office, which should disqualify him from running again, much less holding his present seat.

keithbvadu2

(36,809 posts)
5. Watch out for Cawthorn. He's tough. He beats up rotted trees.
Mon Jan 10, 2022, 03:02 PM
Jan 2022

Watch out for Cawthorn. He's tough. He beats up rotted trees.

JustAnotherGen

(31,825 posts)
7. I'll watch this
Mon Jan 10, 2022, 04:11 PM
Jan 2022

Susan Soloway (Hunterdon County NJ Freeholder ) was at the pre-riot "rally". May be a way to get her stupid evil ass out of office.

Response to MissMillie (Original post)

 

The Jungle 1

(4,552 posts)
10. The 14th is the hammer
Mon Jan 10, 2022, 04:50 PM
Jan 2022

Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

I thought repukes were the law and order party?
Note this part of the law: or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. Many of them are guilty of giving aid. This amendment must be used!
Someone get the bag of feathers and the tar barrel. We got some folks to talk to.

brooklynite

(94,576 posts)
12. Ridiculous...
Mon Jan 10, 2022, 05:02 PM
Jan 2022

If the argument is from the 14th Amendment, someone would have to LEGALLY prove that charge, rather than simply allege it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»North Carolina voters fil...