Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Silent3

(15,909 posts)
Wed Jan 19, 2022, 05:57 PM Jan 2022

Is this a crazy idea for the House?

Chances are I know so little about the internal functioning of the House of Representatives that this is a dumb idea, but I'll run it up the flagpole anyway.

Suppose a bunch of Republican members get subpoenaed, and (naturally) refuse to cooperate.

Could House Democrats pass a rule that, whenever any subpoenaed members are present on the House floor, all current activity can be set aside immediately, at the discretion of the Speaker, and a session to question the subpoenaed members would begin immediately? Maybe even make it difficult for any subpoenaed members present to leave the chamber?

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is this a crazy idea for the House? (Original Post) Silent3 Jan 2022 OP
I love the theater of it. eom guillaumeb Jan 2022 #1
I don't know. Claustrum Jan 2022 #2
go register a few more voters WhiteTara Jan 2022 #8
I like the idea. Delmette2.0 Jan 2022 #3
I'm looking at J6 Comm charging Members with crimes, thus preventing them from seeking reelection. Budi Jan 2022 #4
This!👆 SheltieLover Jan 2022 #5
✔️✔️✔️ LakeArenal Jan 2022 #6
The J6 Comm can't charge anyone with crimes. former9thward Jan 2022 #12
It sure does stop them if convicted. Budi Jan 2022 #13
No one is going to be charged with that. former9thward Jan 2022 #15
It was stated here a while back citing the law that applied Budi Jan 2022 #16
GOP threats of retaliation usually stop us from doing anything. Irish_Dem Jan 2022 #7
The Sergeant at Arms can compel attendance at the House Chamber... brooklynite Jan 2022 #9
That would never fly LetsGoBiden Jan 2022 #10
I was talking about after the subpoena had already been issued n/t Silent3 Jan 2022 #11
Yup. Budi Jan 2022 #14

Claustrum

(5,058 posts)
2. I don't know.
Wed Jan 19, 2022, 06:02 PM
Jan 2022

But I am more worried about how republicans will abuse it when they get in power. Our subpoenas are reasonable and real but they will manufacture some BS to revenge on us.

Delmette2.0

(4,506 posts)
3. I like the idea.
Wed Jan 19, 2022, 06:08 PM
Jan 2022

If they are in their office or a committee meeting will that count? The Sargent of the House could then escort them to the J6 Committee.

 

Budi

(15,325 posts)
4. I'm looking at J6 Comm charging Members with crimes, thus preventing them from seeking reelection.
Wed Jan 19, 2022, 06:10 PM
Jan 2022

Now that would be justice.
It'd be one way of wiping their power-smirks off a lot of Repub faces, just as Nov 2022 approaches.

I'm with you on the outside the box, "this could work"!!


former9thward

(33,424 posts)
12. The J6 Comm can't charge anyone with crimes.
Wed Jan 19, 2022, 09:21 PM
Jan 2022

And even if charged or convicted of a crime, neither stops you from running for office or being elected and serving.

 

Budi

(15,325 posts)
13. It sure does stop them if convicted.
Wed Jan 19, 2022, 10:01 PM
Jan 2022

Investigate & referral for charges.
There sure is a law stating conviction of certain crimes prevent one from being seated in our US congress.

As the OP & I suggest, "we are willing to think outside the box"

If convicted of conspiracy to overthrow the US govt, including an election, they cannot hold a position in our congressional body.

That's what I'm going with myself, as just one way to rid our Congress of the worst of them all, in one big damned sweep right before their reelection.
Anyone within our govt who played a role is removed & forbidden from ever holding office again.

I'm sticking to that likely possibility.




former9thward

(33,424 posts)
15. No one is going to be charged with that.
Wed Jan 19, 2022, 10:08 PM
Jan 2022

And the law does not prevent them from serving. The only limitations on serving is in the Constitution. There is nothing in the Constitution which says what you say.

 

Budi

(15,325 posts)
16. It was stated here a while back citing the law that applied
Wed Jan 19, 2022, 10:15 PM
Jan 2022

I'll post it here when I locate it.
As far as your statement, "No one is going to be charged with that", I say I believe otherwise. That some will indeed be charged with 'conspiracy to commit sedition.' Because some did exactly that.





 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
9. The Sergeant at Arms can compel attendance at the House Chamber...
Wed Jan 19, 2022, 07:27 PM
Jan 2022

…and the Speaker can call for a meeting of the Committee off the Whole House.

…However a House member cannot be compelled to answer questions. Nor can you attack a fellow House member in the Chamber.

 

LetsGoBiden

(58 posts)
10. That would never fly
Wed Jan 19, 2022, 08:03 PM
Jan 2022

I don’t think the house could immediately on the floor subpoena somebody right there with no notice no due process no nothing I’m pretty sure there has to be some steps before that

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is this a crazy idea for ...