This dissent by Justice Sotomayor on Texas abortion law case is so very very powerful

[LetMyPeopleVote]

Link to tweet

[Mary in S. Carolina]

1. This gets old,

not all of us are on Twitter (for good reason). Either share the information or warn us that we are being directed to twitter.

[Takket]

3. there is no DU rule requiring that. And the blue bird clearly IDs the content as a tweet.

[Mary in S. Carolina]

11. No DU rule?

Who cares? Know your audience- if you offend your audience (or part of your audience), your message is ill received.

[gristy]

6. I can see the tweet in the OP, and I'm not on twitter.

That is, I have no twitter account.

[Mary in S. Carolina]

12. Great

I can't. If you want to get information to your audience, then get information to your audience. These links to twitter are ridiculous.

[zaj]

16. It's probably easier for you to change than...

... for you to successfully change everyone around.

You have a right to try, but if you want the hassle gone, you might be able to create a zombie Twitter account, don't friend anyone, and use it to eliminate your frustration.

Hope you find a solution either way!

[Mary in S. Carolina]

17. Thanks Zaj

but someone posted it so we could view.

[littlemissmartypants]

2. Full graphic

[Deuxcents]

9. Ty for this

I would have never been able to know this..or read this, I am so thankful for being on DU and for you to share this. I do know how to save it.. many thank again.

[littlemissmartypants]

14. You're welcome! ❤

[Mary in S. Carolina]

13. Thank you

[littlemissmartypants]

15. You're welcome! ❤

[LetMyPeopleVote]

21. Thank you for posting this

[littlemissmartypants]

22. ❤

[Takket]

4. what exactly does this ruling mean? in the larger context.

[dem4decades]

5. It'll be interesting if California restricts gun ownership the same way.

All of the sudden the SC will change the rules.

[Hekate]

7. It means SCOTUS is proceeding to overthrow Roe v Wade with all deliberate speed...

They are on a path to throw all abortion rights issues back to the states, and will provide no federal government cover for same. They will shortly agree that, the US Constitution be damned to hell, in their minds there is no Constitutional right for women to have bodily autonomy.

That is where we are going. Where we are is 50 states with all different laws. At least half the states, at last count, have introduced a bunch of new laws to protect the life of a fertilized egg.

It is very, very bad out there.

[Mr.Bill]

10. I think the goal is actually

once they get a republican president and both houses of congress, they will flat out pass a federal law against abortion. What's going on now is just testing the Supreme Court.

And by the way, they won't let the filibuster get in their way.

[LetMyPeopleVote]

19. Roe has not been the law in Texas since Sept 1

Justice Sotomayor is right to be upset

Link to tweet

[UTUSN]

8. K&R

[LetMyPeopleVote]

18. Roe v. Wade was on the ballot in 2016

Idiots who voted for Jill Stein or listened to Susan Sarandon can be proud that they killed Roe v. Wade

[riversedge]

20. I thank the activists for womens health. But our SC is working against them. damn