General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPortTack
(35,820 posts)KS Toronado
(23,727 posts)and she doesn't care, what the hell is she up to? Is someone paying her a lot of money under the table?
PortTack
(35,820 posts)She has also told ppl close to her that she thinks this is a winning platform to run as President
quakerboy
(14,868 posts)Think post elected office job offers. And look to family, friends, and personal finances.
wackadoo wabbit
(1,296 posts)I figure she's trying to see if she can be the first politician to get to 0%.
Walleye
(44,805 posts)PortTack
(35,820 posts)iluvtennis
(21,497 posts)soldierant
(9,354 posts)Now that you know better, you'll do better.
WinstonSmith4740
(3,436 posts)However, what concerns me is her crossing the aisle and handing control to McTurtle. Even if the people of Arizona launched an immediate recall, it would still take months to get her out of there, and the damage the Rethugs could do in that space of time would be devastating.
If you've ever watch Stephanie Miller, she had a great line the other morning. She said she thought she had dated the most annoying blonde bi-sexual ever, but was obviously mistaken.
NonPC
(405 posts)We democrats here in AZ thought she'd represent our purple / blue interests. Turns out we were wrong -- she's representing her Pharma and Republican donors. She better make bank now and bask in her 15 minutes now, as she will be primaried when she's up for re-election.
Fullduplexxx
(8,626 posts)TomDaisy
(2,120 posts)TomDaisy
(2,120 posts)Link to tweet
?s=20
Cha
(319,073 posts)any news from AZ Dems in a Tweet.
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)In October, the ADP issued a resolution that urged Sinema to vote with the rest of her colleagues to abolish the Senate filibuster, which allows the minority party to block unfavorable legislation. They had also warned of a possible vote of no confidence should Sinema choose to uphold the filibuster.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/the-arizona-democratic-party-unanimously-voted-to-censure-sen-kyrsten-sinema-for-voting-to-uphold-the-filibuster/ar-AAT2xGz?ocid=uxbndlbing
FakeNoose
(41,632 posts)... she resigns or gets recalled by the Arizona voters.
packman
(16,296 posts)And I'll move to Arizona to sign it or send $ to help fund it
flying_wahini
(8,275 posts)I for one, would love to see her bank account and see who is paying her off.
Salviati
(6,059 posts)There are no provisions for recalling senators under the law. The elections of senators is determined by federal law and the US constitution, which do not permit the recall of senators.
Ford_Prefect
(8,610 posts)AllaN01Bear
(29,490 posts)Celerity
(54,407 posts)If not, your friend needs to read up on the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2), which blocks states from recalling US Congresspersons.
Doc Sportello
(7,964 posts)"There is no constitutional authority to hold a special election that would be required to fill a seat in the event a member was recalled. Article I, section 4 of the Federal Constitution relating to the time for holding a regular election and Article XVII of the Amendments on holding a special election only when a vacancy exists combine to preclude an election to replace a member of Congress who had been recalled. Federal constitutional provisions supersede any state recall procedures for these offices.
The details of the argument are included in the attached Brief on the Constitutionality of the Recall of United States Senators and Representatives In Congress, prepared by Hon. Walter F. George, Chairman of the Committee on Privileges and Elections, United States Senate, on May 18, 1935."
Takket
(23,715 posts)AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)And there is no recall for Senators.
wackadoo wabbit
(1,296 posts)I looked into this after she voted against raising the minimum wage.
panader0
(25,816 posts)before the 2022 elections. While I like seeing her spanked by the AZ Dem Party, it may push her away.
childfreebychoice
(476 posts)Efilroft Sul
(4,413 posts)They picked the wrong time to be small and not answer the call of their country.
Salviati
(6,059 posts)a) neither of them would survive in the republican party - they wouldn't make it past the primary
b) if they jumped ship, they'd lose all their power. Right now those two are the key votes in democrats getting anything passed. If they jumped ship, they'd just be the 51st brick in the republican wall of obstruction. They'd be doing mitch mcconell a favor, but themselves none, as they'd be losing all the attention that they're getting now.
agingdem
(8,849 posts)Mitch will not put up with her garbage...
He has Cancun cruz and shaghead paul to deal with already, let alone goofy kennedy and the fb dimwit from AL.
It is a party of misfits and lunatics...blackburn, rubio, barasso, etc, etc. Not a decent one in the whole party.
(I don't really know what my point is..😬.)
agingdem
(8,849 posts)Last edited Sat Jan 22, 2022, 03:56 PM - Edit history (1)
that's all she is...and yes, the Republican senate buffoons are motley fools to the extreme but they are Mitch's motley fools...as ridiculous as they are, they vote the party line...Sinema would be tolerated but ultimately shoved to the back of the bus when her show-pony days run stale, and that is something Sinema's overblown ego and her delusional sense of self importance would never allow...
BlueNProud
(1,092 posts)Think Joe Lieberman.
Tommymac
(7,334 posts)Yes - this is a real thing.
So she would need to decide before entering the primary.
yellowdogintexas
(23,694 posts)So candidates have essentially set in stone the offices for which they will run the following year, regardless of party.
A person can only run for that position, so if he/she loses in the primary
that's the end.
WHich brings us to Louie Goober. He is running for Texas AG, so he can't run for Congress. TX-1 will elect an equally awful TeaParty person, but that person will not have any seniority or choice committee assignments.
LisaM
(29,634 posts)She clearly craves attention, and people seem only too happy to give it to her.
Tommymac
(7,334 posts)It is her ego that is driving her - she is a raging narcissist.
Take away the spotlight and you take away her power.
ShazzieB
(22,590 posts)According to the article:
It would be nice if it carried some kind of tangible penalty, but this is a good thing, regardless.
At least she'll have no reason to be surprised when she gets primaried. If she even plans to run again, that is.
SergeStorms
(20,591 posts)It let's her know Democrats aren't going to vote for her anymore, but it's too late anyway. She got what she wanted, using the Democratic party to get it.
I think her only move after her term is up is to the private sector, or lobbying.
Takket
(23,715 posts)Not sure if she will be an Indie or a rethug, and if Indie, who will she caucus with? But as we now know her delusional mind seriously sees herself as a legit POTUS candidate, I have to think she'll make a move. I'm thinking she might actually be delusional enough to think she can run as an Indie and win.
i'm fearful she'll go indie and cuacus with the rethugs, and McConnell is back in charge of the Senate. Not that that means a whole lot since we can't pass any bills anyway.
Tommymac
(7,334 posts)Traildogbob
(13,018 posts)How will anything change. Biden can veto any shit they push, we can act like GQP and clog anything, and when Mitch kills filibuster the whole damn country just might wake the Fuck up. 2022 can make those two corp whores irrelevant. And to think she gets a Pension after 6 years for her useless term. Just how fucked up is this country? We are paying trumps pension now. We need a thorough steam cleaning of corruption in the country. With bleach as the steam source. GQP cleaning the swamp my ass. They ARE the detritus settled deep in the muck of the substrate. And added a few feet of it the last 6 years. USA USA USA an embarrassment in the worlds eyes.
WestofDenver
(27 posts)The judiciary has been a success for the Dems and I think M&S has voted to advance Biden's nominees in general. It would be painful to lose momentum, so ego-stroking might be crucial--and condemnation directed at either is, as a practical matter, toothless.
BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)In 2018, she declined to endorse the states Democratic candidate for governor against Republican Doug Ducey. Sinema has also been notably absent at official state party events, compared to her tenure in the Arizona Legislature.
In the Saturday statement, Terán praised Sinema's "leadership" in passing the American Rescue Plan and bipartisan infrastructure law, but added that the "ramifications of failing to pass federal legislation that protects their right to vote are too large and far-reaching."
Terán said the party is "a diverse coalition with plenty of room for policy disagreements, however on the matter of the filibuster and the urgency to protect voting rights, we have been crystal clear. In the choice between an archaic legislative norm and protecting Arizonans right to vote, we choose the latter, and we always will."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/arizona-democratic-party-board-votes-censure-sinema-after-pro-filibuster-n1287890
Emile
(42,289 posts)Celerity
(54,407 posts)(Article VI, Clause 2), would void the attempt.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(135,713 posts)kairos12
(13,590 posts)WestofDenver
(27 posts)The Senator has demonstrated quite the childish streak. I worry that if we're too vigorous she will simply declare herself an independent while agreeing to caucus with the Rs. Same with Manchin. Neither probably have much concern about re-election; if they return the Senate to McC there won't be anything we could do. She doesn't appear to care about censure and may well decide to show us how low she's willing to go.
TomWilm
(1,964 posts)Hulk
(6,699 posts)You're going to urge her to switch parties...and then we lose TOTAL control of the Senate.
AllyCat
(18,842 posts)Emile
(42,289 posts)Cha
(319,073 posts)thought of that
Retrograde
(11,419 posts)She'd be one of 51, not the "outspoken independent" she sees herself as.
Tom Rinaldo
(23,187 posts)She's not a good fit in today's Republican Party either, and the Arizona Republican Party in particular is controlled by rabid MEGAs.
I suspect that her heart isn't exactly in the Senate anymore. Either she has delusions of becoming a Third Way Type candidate for President or she is cashing in on her swing vote status for all the money she can gather during one six year term. She could actually be positioning herself to run as an Independent for Senator next time, as a stepping stone toward an Independent bid for President in 2028. Either way I think she isn't concerned about Democratic Party loyalty.
radius777
(3,921 posts)that word on the street is that she wants to run for President in 2024 - again proving how politically clueless she is. She has no natural base of support, as a Dem, Ind or Republican.
Independents in AZ are of the Cyndi McCain type - and they value voting rights and getting things done - not with siding with voter suppression and obstructing Biden's agenda.
Repubs are insane MAGAs there as you said and would only vote for a die hard RW Trumper. Sinema voted to impeach Trump twice and is pro-choice.
Dems are done with her, even moderate Dems. Mark Kelly from the same state gives us no trouble and voted for the voting rights carve out along with 48 other Dems many from red and purple states themselves.
LENNY0229
(185 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)AZLD4Candidate
(6,780 posts)calimary
(90,020 posts)Because of the balance of power in the Senate.
I said it was a worthy point, except - what's the difference when she votes republi-CON DESPITE being a "Democrat"?
The solution is to build a SOLID Democratic advantage in the Senate so her voice doesn't make ANY difference, PERIOD.
llashram
(6,269 posts)Joinfortmill
(21,163 posts)Mad_Machine76
(24,957 posts)Will she be throwing the Senate to the GOP on Monday?
BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)radius777
(3,921 posts)despite thinking she's politically savvy.
She responded to the censure with a statement claiming to be 'an independent voice for Arizona'. The problem with this thinking is that independents and Cindy McCain types overwhelmingly support voting rights, and Sinema siding with Jim Crow 2.0 does nothing for 'Arizonans' which has increasingly become a diverse state.
She also has no future as a Republican, being a pro-choice bisexual who twice voted to impeach Trump.
dchill
(42,660 posts)WillUSAF
(91 posts)8% approval rating among Dems in AZ. The next 3 years are going to be fun to watch
Dirty Socialist
(3,252 posts)former9thward
(33,424 posts)ProfessorGAC
(76,703 posts)Per CGA dot com:
DownriverDem
(7,014 posts)they didn't do it sooner.
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,857 posts)tiredtoo
(2,949 posts)budkin
(6,849 posts)Thats enough to keep her out.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(10,484 posts)Seems the type who would be taken in by that kind of BS.
bdamomma
(69,532 posts)She is a waste of time. Greedy thing she is.
