General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCable news is dying, but older viewers won't let it go
I wanted to discuss this a little bit, because it seems like many people are watching cable news nonstop and placing great importance on what is said on it. I'm using CNN as an example, because I happened to see their 2021 ratings this morning.
Overall, CNN averaged 1,078,000 total viewers in prime time, 268,000 adults 25-54 in prime time, 773,000 total viewers across the 24-hour day and 185,000 adults 25-54 across the 24-hour in 2021
Let's look at this. CNN in prime time is getting less than 300k viewers under 54.
You know what gets over 300,000 views? Reaction videos on YouTube. ASMR artists. Pam's Home Cooking 'Splosion Extravaganza. (She mixes folksy with ramen!)
In a nation of 340 million people, 300,000 viewers is 0.08%. Even mixing clips on YouTube or shared on websites, this is a vanishingly small number of people under 54 bothering about these overpaid, know-nothing talking heads.
Cable news importance is probably one of the most imbalanced things in our media ecosystem. Who is paying attention? Politicians and other media figures. It's a tiny little bubble they all exist in. When someone retires from politics, here's your cable news paycheck. Back scratches all around.
So all the drama, nonsense, bloviating, "Hey, this person on my tv is wrong!" angst doesn't really mean anything. No one sees it. It's a niche TV show you're watching. It's the Matlock of politics.
If people would stop watching, it would die. If people would stop spreading it, it would die.
And it deserves to die. It serves this country not at all. No, not even the ones we like.
WarGamer
(12,463 posts)TikTok, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
Maybe we already do?
Delphinus
(11,840 posts)[link:https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1017&pid=707224|
I think this other thread here on DU gives you the answer to your question - it is a powerful little film.
(edit as link was wrong place)
WarGamer
(12,463 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)dangerous waters we are treading in.
Sympthsical
(9,104 posts)They might have some vague information sometimes, and they're really useful during breaking stories like disasters.
But cherry-picked information, thinly sourced reports, narrative spinning, speculation, and opinion are not news and information.
I was watching something the other day, an MSNBC clip on YouTube. I realized halfway through, all the sourcing was "Someone on Twitter said," and the entire segment was the anchor and commentators reacting and speculating to what the guy on Twitter said.
It's not news. And if that's news, fine. Then it's not journalism. Unless whatever I add to my Facebook feed is considered journalism. In which case, where is my Edward R Murrow nomination? I did heroic reporting about how it was windy the other day.
brooklynite
(94,723 posts)...the internet tallies were just a ranking comparison to cable news.
People continue to get their news primarily from the broadcast networks:
ABC: 8.7 MILLION
NBC: 7.3 MILLION
CBS: 5.4 MILLION
People watch cable news in the morning to catch up on events, and in the evening to have news personalities tell them things they already believe.
katmondoo
(6,457 posts)Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)I cannot thing that we will be.
Demsrule86
(68,660 posts)SWBTATTReg
(22,158 posts)commented on, non-stop, 24x7, and they act as though we have no minds of our own.
To which, I am sick and tired of listening to them espouse their feelings, their opinions, etc. WHO CARES!?
This is kind of like the so-called friend that you run into at the bar or store, who 'knows everything' and they got to tell you that they 'know everything'. YIKES! Get away from me!
Here, on DU, it's ME time (and the rest of us here on DU, DU time). I don't need any damn fool on TV or a lot of dumb a&& politicians to tell me a damn thing.
LiberalFighter
(51,073 posts)DFW
(54,436 posts)That seems to be a particularly American phenomenon.
LiberalFighter
(51,073 posts)I don't watch morning or noon. I catch 5 for one network and switch to 6 for the other network. 11 I might watch 15 minutes. Local news is also only 30 minute segments.
Mr.Bill
(24,318 posts)but having some training and working in the field a little myself, I have never considered it to be journalism. At its best it's editorializing and entertainment.
PortTack
(32,791 posts)kcr
(15,320 posts)I'll sometimes tune in whenever there's a big, breaking story receiving live coverage, but that's about it. I scan the headlines on their websites about once a day, though.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)The sooner the better!
Midnight Writer
(21,794 posts)The actual live viewing numbers are a little misleading.
I don't watch FOX News, but I can tell you pretty much what is going on there on a given day because I will see it posted online, or I will hear about it from my neighbors.
onenote
(42,757 posts)CNN had its second highest number of viewers ever in 2021. And 2020 was the network's best year. Doesn't seem like its "dying."
Yes, CNN viewership was down in 2021 from 2020, but that is the normal pattern -- election years attract higher viewership than non-election years. But the drop off in 2021 was less than the drop off 2017. CNN is one of the top five viewed cable networks (not just cable news networks).
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,856 posts)... until 1963, yet I'd guess that Americans are more misinformed now.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/evening-news-marks-golden-anniversary-of-30-minute-broadcast/
(CBS News) NEW YORK -- On Sept. 2, 1963, what had been, since 1948, a 15-minute broadcast, anchored first by Douglas Edwards and then Walter Cronkite, doubled to 30 minutes overnight.
hunter
(38,326 posts)... don't pay any attention at all to "traditional" television or radio. They stream everything. No cable, no broadcast.