General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDominion to Mike Lindell: No settlement for you because you're a 'schoolyard bully
I will enjoy weeing Lind going into bankruptcy
Link to tweet
It is no stretch to say that these counterclaims threaten the rule of law, they continued. If allowed to proceed, they would impose liability on innumerable parties engaging in ordinary, day-to-day acts of litigation.
Dominion filed a $1.3 billion defamation suit against Lindell in February of last year over his false claims that the companys voting machines enabled mass voter fraud in the 2020 election. Dominion is also suing former Trump lawyers Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell for making similar claims.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,148 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)underpants
(195,585 posts)I love it.
Takket
(23,555 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(176,769 posts)Beachnutt
(8,873 posts)nothing can save you from going broke, not even a pardon...
Deuxcents
(26,025 posts)Blue Owl
(58,613 posts)NCjack
(10,297 posts)into a first-class company that makes high-quality products and deliveries customer satisfaction. And, no job for Lindell. Well, maybe he could pickup the cigarette butts in the parking lot.
monkeyman1
(5,109 posts)More_Cowbell
(2,241 posts)For defamation law firms. There's no way they're not seeing this all the way through.
cadoman
(1,617 posts)Where in the article is it quoting any source that a settlement was offered or discussed?
The facts are that a countersuit was filed by Lindell and Dominion filed a motion to dismiss it. The case is interesting enough without having to concoct fake settlement discussions.
Hassin Bin Sober
(27,422 posts)Or confusing (or being sloppy with) settlement versus judgement - which often times are used interchangeably.
Either way, nothing to get upset over.
cadoman
(1,617 posts)They report on the motion to dismiss so they knew it happened. They title the article as though a settlement discussion was in progress and ended based on nothing whatsoever.
That is perhaps not shit journalism, but at best, trash journalism. It leaves their readers with an impression of events that happened that never did.
The facts are there. Report on the facts. Don't imply events occurred that didn't.
This type of article is dead simple to write. You summarize the facts and call each side for comment to give the story a bit of substance. Send it out the door. No need to make shit up.
Hassin Bin Sober
(27,422 posts)Im not a lawyer but most of this is plain English.
You can just feel the sarcasm and contempt for Lindells clown lawyers ooze of the pages.
I think these lawyers know better but they have giant man babies as clients so they do their best. Like trump suing Maher for calling him an orangutan. Lol.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.227759/gov.uscourts.dcd.227759.115.1.pdf
