Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZProgressive

(29,322 posts)
Thu Feb 3, 2022, 05:27 PM Feb 2022

Republicans Who Voted to Impeach Trump Are Fundraising Laps Around Their MAGA Primary Opponents

All seven House Republicans who are seeking reelection after voting to impeach former President Donald Trump for his role in the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol are faring well financially, campaign disclosures filed this week with the Federal Election Commission show.

The New York Times points out that despite drawing Trump’s wrath, the seven Republicans are out-raising their primary opponents. Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), for instance, raised a war chest of around $6.5 million in 2021, and is entering the 2022 election year with just under $5 million, while her opponent, Harriet Hageman, has about $380,000 in cash on hand. Cheney became a lightning rod for attacks from Trump and his allies after speaking out against the former president’s false election claims, as well as for her prominent seat on the Jan. 6 committee. Former president George W. Bush donated $5,800 to Cheney’s campaign, while establishment figures in the GOP like Utah Sen. Mitt Romney and former House Speaker Paul Ryan have each helped with fundraising.

In Michigan, meanwhile, Rep. Fred Upton has about $1.5 million in cash, while state Rep. Steve Carra, whom Trump endorsed, has $200,000. Joe Kent, the Army Special Forces veteran running to unseat Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler (R-Wash.), also couldn’t match the incumbent’s haul, although the that the gap is narrower ($297,000 for Kent and $422,000 for Butler in the fourth quarter) than some of the other races, perhaps due to his frequent appearances throughout right-wing media, including Steve Bannon’s podcast.

NBC News points out that Rep. Peter Meijer (R-Mich.) hauled in over eight times what his Trump-endorsed challenger did in the fourth quarter. Reps. Dan Newhouse (R-Wash.) and David Valadao (R-Calif.) are also out-raising the field — although Trump has yet to endorse a challenger in either race. Rep. Tom Rice (R-S.C.) is out-raising challenger state Rep. Russell Fry, although Trump only recently endorsed the latter.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/republicans-impeach-trump-vote-liz-cheney-fundraising-1294606/

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
5. So, the question becomes
Thu Feb 3, 2022, 05:53 PM
Feb 2022

Do we donate to these people, even though that may mean they win, or do we hope that they get primaried by a RWNJ that has no hope of winning the general election? It's probably a case by case basis but it might be important next summer for someone knowledgeable to let us know.

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
9. Roughly my starting point.
Thu Feb 3, 2022, 06:21 PM
Feb 2022

My lone exception might be Cheney, and that's hard for me. But I'm afraid whatever comes after her will be worse, regardless of who the democratic sacrificial lamb is.

Gore1FL

(21,127 posts)
14. IMO, if Liz Cheney is steamrolled it isn't because she didn't get enough donations from Democrats.
Thu Feb 3, 2022, 08:10 PM
Feb 2022

It's your money; spend it as you wish.

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
16. Kinda the point
Thu Feb 3, 2022, 08:26 PM
Feb 2022

"Better the devil you know"

She won't be supporting the current leadership, and to some extent, while not supporting Pelosi, she could be the occasional vote in opposition to the current GQP leadership. If the dem can't win, better her than those that would replace her. She might even begin to understand the "support" she got from the left and consider it to some small extent.

Ford_Prefect

(7,878 posts)
13. They will never be an honorable opposition. They haven't been since before Nixon. The myth of their
Thu Feb 3, 2022, 08:09 PM
Feb 2022

prior patriotic honor is greatly exaggerated. Just as the myth of conservative reason and justice is. Anything you may imagine to once have been true is now only a figment of our cultural imagination, like trickle-down economics or justice. I do not doubt there have been in the past Republicans and Conservatives who may on a single issue like the environment, women's health, peace, or even Civil Rights have seen the nation's greater good as paramount. Such people are no longer allowed to belong to the contemporary Republican party. The party is owned lock, stock and mailing list by a minority of extremely rich and powerful arch-conservative Christian zealots who have been building it from the inside out as a machine to push their desire for a Dominionist ruled theocracy to the forefront of American political and cultural life.

The party as a whole and many individual office holders at high and very low levels alike are not to be trusted any more than DJT should be. The votes taken in January and since should have made this abundantly clear. The party is toxic at every level and represents the very worst of American political life. One need only look to Georgia to see this in action.

That some of them have abandoned Trump is only sound political reasoning. That they support much of what he and McConnell have wrought should be their defining feature. There is no "both-sides" to this evaluation because there is no longer any moderation in the GOP, only the fear of exposure daylight may bring.

A chilling example is that NOT ONE of those GOP members sitting in the House or the Senate has undertaken to decry the outright strangling of the vote enacted by GOP led legislatures in state, after state, after state. Nor do they appear to support the views of the CDC or medical science regarding COVID.

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
17. The last was
Thu Feb 3, 2022, 08:47 PM
Feb 2022

John Boehner. He understood the difference between leading, and entertaining ones constituents. Mind you I agreed with nothing he stood for, but in the end, he was more concerned about being right, than being popular, even if he had a bad understanding of what "right" was.

Picaro

(1,517 posts)
11. Maybe things aren't so grim after all
Thu Feb 3, 2022, 07:40 PM
Feb 2022

I believe that the 2020 Presidential election was a referendum on Trump. He lost big.

With all these stories coming out Democrats need to run on the catastrophe that will occur should the Republicans regain a majority in either house. Tie Trump and the crazy wing around the neck of every Republican—even the rare sane ones.The gloves need to be completely off.

A vote for a Republican is a vote for Trump and the anti-democracy wing.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Republicans Who Voted to ...