General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDwayne 'The Rock' Johnson Pulls Support From Joe Rogan After N-Word Clips Surface
A compilation of video clips featuring controversial podcaster Joe Rogan using the N-word has made Dwayne The Rock Johnson rescind his previous support of Rogan and his podcast The Joe Rogan Experience. Until Rogans racist comments surfaced, Johnson was one of the only mainstream figures to show Rogan support amid an exodus of artists from Spotify in protest of Rogans spread of COVID-19 misinformation.
Last week, Johnson commented on an Instagram video of Rogan addressing the controversy around his podcast, writing, Great stuff here, brother. Perfectly articulated. He even added that he looked forward to breaking out the tequila with Rogan and appearing on his podcast.
Johnson retracted his support of Rogan after singer India Arie shared several clips of Rogan using the N-word on his podcast, as well as one clip comparing predominantly Black neighborhoods to the Planet of the Apes. In a tweet responding to Don Winslow, Johnson wrote: I was not aware of his N-word use before my comments, but now Ive become educated to his complete narrative. Learning moment for me.
Link to tweet
https://www.msn.com/en-us/music/news/dwayne-the-rock-johnson-pulls-support-from-joe-rogan-after-n-word-clips-surface/ar-AATxhul
Turbineguy
(37,324 posts)of all the idiots who need Rogan's advice on every topic?
BootinUp
(47,144 posts)Walleye
(31,017 posts)Seems that men can be blind to other mens faults. They think being macho is a virtue
50 Shades Of Blue
(9,985 posts)Leith
(7,809 posts)The leopard started eating his face and he got the picture.
Poiuyt
(18,123 posts)First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out
Because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for meand there was no one left to speak for me.
Martin Niemöller
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... shit.
He's a text book racist who's been enabled by money
Sympthsical
(9,073 posts)Everything being dug up is pre-Spotify.
If someone came to me with, "Do you know what Sally said ten years ago?" I'd ask that person why they're wasting both our time. If Sally made those remarks while employed by us, that's a different kettle of fish.
Source: Am HR. And yes, I have been approached with, "Do you see what someone said online a century and a half ago?!" I do not ever care. I am not someone's off hours baby-sitter and the Ultimate God-Like Arbiter of Behavior in All Ages Past. Now if corporate catches wind and decides you're gone, that'll be that.
But HR? Covid has tapped our resources as it is. Please don't bombard us with online social media bullshit. This isn't college where people have to do something just because there's a bonnet enclosed bee afoot. We have actual important shit to do.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)Sympthsical
(9,073 posts)While employed by the company.
If you go back and read through stories of people getting fired for past behavior or social media issues, you'll notice it is almost always corporate's choice. They make the decision, "Hey, this is getting us bad publicity!" It is literally above my pay grade. We're just here for the paperwork.
If people want to protest, boycott, petition Spotify to deplatform, they have that right.
But the idea that people should go running to HR is a terrible one. Don't hassle people who haven't the power nor inclination. It's been a fun two years for us chasing employees around, monitoring protocols, and putting various systems and measures in place that we had no plans for.
We don't need a Twitter campaign we can do zero about on top of it. Nothing will be done to Rogan until the CEO and/or shareholders decide things.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts).. a company when the blatantly see it?
Just let it go?
tia
Sympthsical
(9,073 posts)Look, there's internet world where people think things just happen a certain way because they want them to. Maybe they think things work that way because they saw it on tv. Who knows. And that's a fun world! Anything is possible.
Then there's the real world. There are rules and policies in place. They are there for reasons (spoiler: Usually to protect the company, but a lot of the time we manage some good). There are things within an employee's power and things that are not. If you think Spotify HR has any say-so over this, I'd like to beckon a return from internet world. It's not gonna happen that way. They probably already have a file about Rogan that stuff goes into, as employees have complained about him before. "Behold The File of We Hear You, for it is voluminous and inert!"
It's going to be the call of the people much higher up than the usual HR desk jockey. It's not helpful. It's not going to change anything. It's not in their power.
There's useful and useless vigor. This would be the useless kind.
It's all going to come down to money. Cost/benefit. How much will they lose and project to further lose if they keep him vs. how much does it cost to boot him. It is literally the only decision that is going to matter in this.
I do not care if Rogan stays or goes, because I do not listen to him. But deciding to pointlessly hassle HR people is a bad idea. Not super appreciated. There's probably a better one.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)so ... yeah, I'd be at HR with his recent racist shit and in view of his past racist shit I'd not give him the benefit of the doubt
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)Sympthsical
(9,073 posts)Truly, I do. Because in the instances that I've personally dealt with, it was usually petty score settling between employees who don't like each other. You know, a productive use of everyone's time.
kcr
(15,315 posts)lame54
(35,287 posts)If not they are forced to ride this pony all the way to hell
1 tenth of a billion dollars