Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah - from 024

[malaise]

Lock him up!

[underpants]

1. I just saw that on Morning Joe

I thought - well of course there’s a clip of him making a complete ass out of himself.

[malaise]

6. Me too - I actually posted Nancy tearing up his speech two days ago on another thread.

MJS started with Nancy tearing up his speech

[GoCubsGo]

2. Wow, I totally forgot about that!

It's ALWAYS projection with these fuckers, isn't it? Always.

[spanone]

3. Thank Goddess we don't have to listen to that fucking voice 24/7 anymore

[gab13by13]

7. He's still the leader of the GQP.

Nothing will be done. I just read where proving a case against him will be difficult. It must be proven that he ripped up and hid documents with criminal intent. WTF, what other reason is there when you rip documents up that should be preserved?

Why bother discussing all of his crimes when the bottom line is, IMO, a former president is above the law. Maybe state prosecutors will convict him, they don't believe a former president is above the law.

[Bernardo de La Paz]

25. We know one hundred times over you think nothing will be done. . . . . nt

[malaise]

8. A man who sent his goons to overthrow an election

thought tearing up his speech was disrespectful to the Chambers of Congress

[Lonestarblue]

20. A speech of which there were hundreds of copies!

Versus the single incriminating copies of notes made by Trump and his aides that he ripped to shreds. Remember the notes he demanded from the interpreter at one of his very private meetings with Putin. I’m sure those are in the National Archives—not.

[KS Toronado]

22. I've often wondered if anyone from the DOJ or FBI or Pentagon

has ever interviewed said interpreter to find out what FailedCoupGuy wanted to keep secret.

[malaise]

29. He is raving mad

Take that to the bank

[Yonnie3]

4. BIC

Bullshitter In Chief

His whole career.

Edit: His whole life

[Emile]

5. Con Man No Shame

[MiHale]

9. I believe that paper Nancy tore up...

was a copy of the speech not the official document.

Does it matter?

[malaise]

10. You are correct

It was a copy

[lagomorph777]

27. I could print it out and tear it up and it's perfectly legal.

Not to mention, satisfying.

Same for Nancy.

[2naSalit]

13. Yup.

Original is to be preserved, even he didn't have the original though it becomes that after he reads it aloud in session because there will be alterations on the spot that must be preserved.

There were hundreds of copies in the room so her action was inconsequential, therefore, not illegal.

[Wounded Bear]

19. Probably everybody in the room got a copy...

[fightforfreedom]

12. Trump will be indicted one way or another.

[2naSalit]

14. Anything less is unacceptable...

To people of conscience.

[BSdetect]

15. I hope the Dems are going to be very tough re drumpf indictments - full on.

[2naSalit]

16. That makes two of us.

[L. Coyote]

24. Democrats cannot indict anyone, the government does that.

[jaxexpat]

17. Publicly shaming the sort of people Trump represents......

will be hard to do because of the people he represents.

[2naSalit]

30. True. ...nt

[Midnight Writer]

18. This demonstrates that TFG knew full well it was illegal to destroy documents.

[malaise]

23. He also knew Pelosi tore up a copy

He's a pathological liar and he projects about everything

[2naSalit]

31. He's just...

Following orders from all those voices in his head, unfortunately one of which is that of pootaine from the other side of the planet.

[Kid Berwyn]

21. And throw away the key.

Who knew Dimdonnie was smart enough to obstruct justice by eating evidence?

[crickets]

26. 🎶 Rules for thee but not for meeee.... Like a broken record. nt

[malaise]

28. Yep

[2naSalit]

32. And that, right there...

Is what they mean by "American Exceptionalism".