Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOpinion: The grim fate of the Voting Rights Act in the hands of the Supreme Court
This opinion only makes sense if the SCOTUS is going to strike down or further gut the Voting Rights Act. With three TFG assholes on the SCOTUS, the Voting Rights Act is doomed. The future of the SCOTUS, Roe v. Wade and the Voting Rights Act was on the ballot in 2016 and now we are seeing the consequences of people not voting for Hillary Clinton
Link to tweet
Will anything be left of the Voting Rights Act after the Supreme Court finishes with it? Its looking pretty grim. In 2013, the Supreme Court dismantled the part of the law that required states with a history of discrimination to get approval for changes to election rules. Last year, the court all but eliminated minority voters ability to use another part of the law to challenge discriminatory voting restrictions. Now, the court has signaled its interest in frustrating the laws aim of ensuring that minority voters are adequately represented.
The justices acted in a case from Alabama, where African Americans account for 27 percent of the population but a new map features just one Black-majority district among the states seven congressional seats. A panel of three lower court judges (including two Trump appointees) found that the map violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and told the state to create another district where Black voters can elect the candidate of their choice.......
Nevertheless, the courts conservative majority might be poised to rewrite Section 2 in the way that Alabama proposes. Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, in a concurrence joined by Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., said that the outcome of the case was not clearcut in favor of those challenging Alabamas map. That can only be true if the court is preparing to transform the law.
More ominously, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., while voting to leave the lower court order in place, flagged the only lower court decision to have embraced Alabamas position, along with the article I co-authored examining the implications of that approach. The message is clear: The courts conservatives are seriously considering a race-blind interpretation of Section 2 that would neuter its effectiveness.
The justices acted in a case from Alabama, where African Americans account for 27 percent of the population but a new map features just one Black-majority district among the states seven congressional seats. A panel of three lower court judges (including two Trump appointees) found that the map violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and told the state to create another district where Black voters can elect the candidate of their choice.......
Nevertheless, the courts conservative majority might be poised to rewrite Section 2 in the way that Alabama proposes. Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, in a concurrence joined by Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., said that the outcome of the case was not clearcut in favor of those challenging Alabamas map. That can only be true if the court is preparing to transform the law.
More ominously, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., while voting to leave the lower court order in place, flagged the only lower court decision to have embraced Alabamas position, along with the article I co-authored examining the implications of that approach. The message is clear: The courts conservatives are seriously considering a race-blind interpretation of Section 2 that would neuter its effectiveness.
Like Roe, it appears that the SCOTUS is going to gut or kill the Voting Rights Act.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 489 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Opinion: The grim fate of the Voting Rights Act in the hands of the Supreme Court (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
Feb 2022
OP
In times like these I wish there was a GOD - these people have no morals or ethics.
walkingman
Feb 2022
#1
walkingman
(7,609 posts)1. In times like these I wish there was a GOD - these people have no morals or ethics.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)3. Lol, me too! Until this era I didn't quite realize that knowing
"these people" would be struck down by a righteously wrathful god was such a key reward of faith. Come to think of it, that may explain the religious fervor of many who give no other indication of sincerity.
betsuni
(25,481 posts)2. K&R