General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDoes this sound like Melania Trump ?
Parler announces social media 'special arrangement' with Melania Trump
Parler announced on Wednesday that it is engaging in a social media "special arrangement" with former first lady Melania Trump where she will share exclusive communications on the social media network. Parler said that Trump would share "exclusive communications on Parler," noting it is already powering her blockchain technology and nonfungible token platform, MelaniaTrump.com.
Melania Trump said:
I am excited and inspired by free speech platforms that give direct communication to people worldwide.
Parler has been on the forefront of utilizing Web3 technology and empowers its users to foster productive discourse.
https://thehill.com/policy/technology/593453-parler-announces-social-media-special-arrangement-with-melania-trump
Mary in S. Carolina
(1,364 posts)Cha
(297,196 posts)Blue Owl
(50,356 posts)Cha
(297,196 posts)Fly.. yes, that Fly.
Liberty Belle
(9,535 posts)Not surprising; all of the Trumps are dishonest about pretty much everything they do.
Baked Potato
(7,733 posts)keithbvadu2
(36,791 posts)In which of her six languages did she say it?
.
MLAA
(17,288 posts)Ilsa
(61,695 posts)She's a strange goldigger. I figured she'd be long gone by now.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)applegrove
(118,642 posts)Oh no. They've discovered the world now and that they could grift off of. Hope it tanks the Conservative authoritarians' ambitions too.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)But she is no doubt behind the gift for money that her Parler announcement is enabling.
Deuxcents
(16,199 posts)But shes not. If theres wiggle room..the grifter will find it. Both are disgusting people
oasis
(49,382 posts)C'mon man.
arthritisR_US
(7,288 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)On fockeen Chrees-muss.
NOW how much would you pay?
Leghorn21
(13,524 posts)platform when it comes online next month or April or mid-summer or whatever?
No Vested Interest
(5,166 posts)Her allowance must have been cut, plus her son is getting older and needs more money as well.
arthritisR_US
(7,288 posts)JI7
(89,248 posts)look at the face.
Solly Mack
(90,764 posts)Corgigal
(9,291 posts)loves nothing but the balance of hidden checking account.
Did she ever get her son a dog? Didnt think so.
Grins
(7,217 posts)WTF does that even mean???
And about what? And whats her take off the top on this grift?
lunatica
(53,410 posts)She can freely tell Donald to fook off on Parler.
blogslug
(38,000 posts)The $170,000 purchase of an NFT collection auctioned by Melania Trump was made by the entity that originally put the NFT up for sale, according to blockchain records.
After the auction's conclusion, the New York Times ran a piece describing the sale as attracting a few bids all around 1,800 SOL, ultimately ending with somebody purchasing the NFT for 1,800 SOL worth $170,000 at the time (now $200,000), a price far below the figure touted by the auction's press release and which the paper described as "deflated results" due to a wider crash in the price of cryptocurrencies.
Now, according to Solana blockchain records reviewed by Motherboard and shared with an independent researcher, we know who bought the NFT collection: Melania Trump herself, or at least, whoever set up the auction for her. In a statement to Motherboard from "the Office of Melania Trump," Trump said "the nature of Blockchain protocol is entirely transparent. Accordingly, the public can view each transaction on the blockchain. The transaction was facilitated on behalf of a third-party buyer."
Some suspect it was a "Wash Trade"
https://petapixel.com/2022/02/07/traders-are-buying-their-own-nfts-to-drive-up-prices-report/
Chainalysis found 262 users that sold an NFT to a self-financed address more than 25 times. While the firm couldnt be 100% sure that all instances of these sales to self-financed wallets are intended wash trades, the threshold of 25 trades gave it a higher degree of confidence that these were habitual wash traders.
We calculated these 262 wash traders overall profits by subtracting the amount theyve spent on gas fees from the amount theyve made selling NFTs to unsuspecting buyers, Chainalysis says. One caveat for this analysis is that it only captures trades made in Ethereum and Wrapped Ethereum, so theres likely wash trading activity were not considering here.
The firm found that while a majority of wash traders have been unsuccessful, those who have succeeded have done so in a way that the entire group of 262 saw massive profit overall: 110 gained $8,875,315 from wash trading, while the majority 152 unprofitable traders only lost $416,948...
lark
(23,099 posts)Otherwise, she is consistently a prune of unhappiness with her squinted eyes and pursed lips.
Edit - fixed typo