Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,895 posts)
Mon Feb 14, 2022, 11:05 PM Feb 2022

Can Democrats See What's Coming? by Ezra Klein,

who is coming up on Lawrence Show, MSNBC.

'If you had to distill the ambitions of the Democratic Party down to a single word, you might well choose “Denmark.” But “France” would also work. Or “Germany.” Any Western European nation, really, with the social insurance options many of us envy: universal health care and affordable child care, to name but a few. Much of modern American liberalism is designed to close those gaps, to build here what already exists there.

I hope to close those gaps, too. But what about building here what does not already exist there?

Over the past few years, social insurance programs did much to ease suffering, but it was mRNA vaccines that did the most to protect human life. And this points toward a place where American liberalism could dream bigger dreams. Most liberals can list the programs they want the government to create or expand. Fewer can name the five technologies they want the government to finance or the five scientific challenges they want to see it mobilize to solve. But technology is central to how we make the future look different from the past. To leave that to the market, or to think it apolitical, is abdication.

In an important speech at — sigh — Davos, Janet Yellen, the treasury secretary, began building a framework for those questions. The Biden administration, she said, was pursuing a “modern supply-side economics.” She argued that the economy isn’t growing as it could because it doesn’t have enough of what it needs. We need more workers, we need more roads and bridges and airports and broadband, we need more scientific breakthroughs — oh, and we need a stable climate, too. And to get all that, we need government.

. . .

My worry is rather the opposite: that the Biden administration’s supply-side agenda is stuck in the past and not yet imagining the future.'>>>

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/12/opinion/yellen-supply-side-liberalism.html

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

radius777

(3,635 posts)
4. Agree, the gov't needs to do more to solve
Mon Feb 14, 2022, 11:26 PM
Feb 2022

many scientific and medical challenges.

The market has no incentive to cure any disease, as there is too much money to be made on pharma and expensive treatments.

The market has no incentive to solve climate change.

The market has no incentive to care about much of what concerns citizens as a whole, only their bottom line and shareholders.

elleng

(130,895 posts)
6. 'What about building here what already exists there?'
Mon Feb 14, 2022, 11:51 PM
Feb 2022

A lot of problems we need new things to solve.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can Democrats See What's ...