Sussman responds to Durham's nonsense

[EleanorR]

Quite the read.

Unfortunately, the Special Counsel has done more than simply file a document
identifying potential conflicts of interest. Rather, the Special Counsel has again made a filing in
this case that unnecessarily includes prejudicial—and false—allegations that are irrelevant to his
Motion and to the charged offense, and are plainly intended to politicize this case, inflame media
coverage, and taint the jury pool.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638.37.0_1.pdf

[Blue Owl]

1. Bull Durham

[L. Coyote]

7. Expensive buulshit.

How many millions of $$$$ is this costing us?

Link to tweet

[Skittles]

2. could a legal eagle interpret this

I have such a hard time trying to read these docs.

[Kaleva]

4. +1

I have watched several news segments on this and I haven't a clue as to what it's about.

[L. Coyote]

10. That's the idea, make it too obtuse, entangled, and kraken

that it can be characterized by wingnuts any way they want.

[Cha]

3. KR TY

[Whiskeytide]

5. It's lawyer for: Durham is full of shit, is politicizing ...

… the matter, playing to the wingnut media, and trying to confuse potential jurors.

[spanone]

6. Durham was appointed by Barr....say no more

[ashredux]

8. When you find nothing, put a lot of words on paper and let people speculate

[DallasNE]

9. If Durham Had Evidence

Last edited Wed Feb 16, 2022, 12:39 AM - Edit history (1)

He would be handing out indictments against the alleged people. Since no charges were filed you can be sure that this is nothing more than a political stunt. Disbar Durham.

Oops, when I kept reading, I saw that a single charge of lying was filed against a single individual. But the work looks amateurish and is not specific. according to the attorney for the defendant. But this was done last October so why this sudden activity now? The timing looks orchestrated.