'Several' Jurors Who Rejected Palin's Defamation Suit Against the NYT knew judge dismissed

[Nevilledog]

Link to tweet

Tweet text:

Adam Klasfeld
@KlasfeldReports
DEVELOPING:

'Several' Jurors Who Rejected Sarah Palin's Defamation Suit Against the New York Times Received Push Alerts Telling Them the Judge Dismissed It https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/several-jurors-who-rejected-sarah-palins-defamation-suit-against-the-new-york-times-received-push-alerts-telling-them-the-judge-dismissed-it/… via @lawcrimenews

lawandcrime.com
'Several' Jurors Who Rejected Sarah Palin's Defamation Suit Against the New York Times Received...
A judge said "several" jurors heard about his ruling dismissing Sarah Palin's lawsuit against the Times via push alerts before they rejected it, too.
11:26 AM · Feb 16, 2022

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/several-jurors-who-rejected-sarah-palins-defamation-suit-against-the-new-york-times-received-push-alerts-telling-them-the-judge-dismissed-it/


Several of the federal jurors who rejected Sarah Palin’s defamation lawsuit against the New York Times received “push notifications” on their phones informing them that the judge had dismissed the case a day earlier, according to a new court document.

Senior U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff wrote that the jurors told his clerk that his ruling did not factor into their deliberations.

“Late yesterday, in the course of such an inquiry in this case — in which the jury confirmed that they had fully understood the instructions and had no suggestions regarding jury instructions for future cases — several jurors volunteered to the law clerk that, prior to the rendering of the jury verdict in this case, they had learned of the fact of this Court’s Rule 50 determination on Monday to dismiss the case on legal grounds,” Rakoff wrote in a two-page order on Wednesday.

Legal experts questioned the timing of Rakoff’s ruling on Tuesday, which found that no reasonable jury could have found actual malice in the Times’s 2017 editorial falsely linking Palin to Jared Lee Loughner’s mass shooting.

*snip*


The judge was stupid. He could have waited until the jury finished deliberations or just granted a directed verdict before the jury even had to deliberate.

[Wounded Bear]

1. Not suprising...they weren't sequestered...nt

[EYESORE 9001]

2. Trying to open the door for a mistrial?

I don’t know…looks suspicious to me.

[RockRaven]

3. While in theory this could be fodder for an appeal, so long as the jurors all stick to their guns

that it didn't influence their verdict at all, the courts probably let it stand.

[Chainfire]

4. Why would Jurors, in deliberation, have access to their cell phones?

That would mean that they could be getting "advice" or threats from anyone in the world. Like I said, messy.

[PJMcK]

10. They weren't sequestered

Besides, this was a civil case.

[Tomconroy]

5. Even smart judges do dumb things. Most would wait until

after the verdict to make that ruling. Kinda dumb, Judge Rakoff.

[Nevilledog]

6. More would grant the motion for a directed verdict.

[Tomconroy]

7. He was reversed before on the case. Once bitten, twice shy.

[Nevilledog]

9. He's looking at #3

[MineralMan]

8. Is there any corroboration for this?

Two threads on it, but just one link to lawandcrime.com, whatever that might be. I went to the site, which has the appearance of an ad-heavy clickbait site.

I need some additional sources here.