The "Durham Report" vague enough to be useful

[Septua]

It's complicated and opaque enough for Trump can run with it...

I know when I read it, I can't comprehend what I'm reading.

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a39080236/durham-report-donald-trump-worse-than-watergate/

[spanone]

1. Perfect for trump to wrap his lies around it...that's why it's worded that way

we saw how right wing media jumped on it

[Omen78]

2. If Durham's investigation

Has legs you'll see indictments. Until then, I would just ignore anything in that general direction.

[C_U_L8R]

3. When do deceptive filings constitute cause for firing?

This guy does not seem to be honestly pursuing anything except scuttlebutt and a paycheck.

[Ocelot II]

4. Special counsels can be fired by an AG only for cause, and my guess is

that although cause arguably exists, the AG, and Biden indirectly, would prefer to let Durham do his thing because they know there isn't any there there and Durham won't uncover anything that would make a media splash for the RW. He found a couple of procedural fuckups but it's all so obscure and boring that the report will be forgotten soon. If Durham were sacked, Fox would make it look like Nixon's Saturday Night Massacre. Better to let the whole mess fade into well-deserved obscurity.

[C_U_L8R]

6. True. He's undoing himself the longer he chases vapor.

[NCjack]

5. Durham is wrecking himself and doesn't know how to stop.

[lagomorph777]

7. Bullshit Durham

...strikes out again.