General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJohnSJ
(98,883 posts)Hugin
(37,624 posts)I know you're correct, but, why?
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)one of the major world powers after WWII who were on the winning side
Hugin
(37,624 posts)Which, ironically, included at the time Ukraine and several of the now NATO member nations.
So, how come only Russia retains the veto?
I know, you don't have any answer to that either. I'm thinking out loud.
tritsofme
(19,851 posts)Hugin
(37,624 posts)Interesting. Thanks for the lesson.
I suppose it was due to Russia being in the nuke club.
SheltieLover
(78,341 posts)former9thward
(33,424 posts)SheltieLover
(78,341 posts)former9thward
(33,424 posts)Only the SC can approve changes and those would be vetoed.
C_U_L8R
(49,129 posts)They can stuff their veto.
SheltieLover
(78,341 posts)at140
(6,216 posts)Russia will just veto such resolution and will be joined by China.
The UN charter is such, they can not expel the veto powered members, is how I understand it.
C_U_L8R
(49,129 posts)blogslug
(39,110 posts)Amishman
(5,918 posts)Only the security council has any power, and anything involving a major power is pointless as well because of the veto
