General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPrediction
Biden will have another Supreme Court vacancy to fill this year
That is all for now.
Ohio Joe
(21,752 posts)And I really hope it's Clarence Thomas.
Chainfire
(17,530 posts)SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)🤞
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Bettie
(16,089 posts)is he saying he won't vote for a SCOTUS nominee who isn't white and right wing?
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Manchin, who often clashes with his own party, told reporters his view was consistent with his view when Republican President Donald Trump nominated Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court a little over a month before the 2020 presidential election.
Manchin voted against Barrett's confirmation, though he said he had supported her nominations for a previous post. He added it would be "hypocritical" for him to support a similar move by Biden.
From: https://news.yahoo.com/manchin-not-back-supreme-court-001114325.html
Bettie
(16,089 posts)Does he mean anytime after this November? Is it one month before? Six months?
Ah well. Hopefully, it will come soon and it won't be as much of an issue. I don't expect Manchin to cooperate on anything anymore.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Joinfortmill
(14,416 posts)Solomon
(12,310 posts)bluecollar2
(3,622 posts)OLDMDDEM
(1,572 posts)rurallib
(62,406 posts)EYESORE 9001
(25,928 posts)involving a pubic hair on a can of Diet Coke.
okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)SergeStorms
(19,193 posts)donated their pubic hair, now that would be enough for a certain SCOTUS judge nicknamed, "Clarence Thomas", to choke on.
Sunsky
(1,737 posts)the one being replaced wasn't appointed by a Democrat. A C-T would be the best news for me.
GoCubsGo
(32,079 posts)One can only hope.
Joinfortmill
(14,416 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,130 posts)liberalla
(9,238 posts)Uniting feuding factions, around a singular mission of
STEALING THE ELECTION!!
Damn!
That's no beating around the bush.
Plainly stated and IN YOUR FACE.
I need to find that NYT article.
Super graphic!
FoxNewsSucks
(10,429 posts)and his corrupt wife, remember - they don't give a damn when they're found out and their corruption made public. They can't be shamed, and just don't give a shit what the peasants think. They don't answer to the people anyway.
Just like every other republicon.
dchill
(38,472 posts)Inquiring minds want to know.
ananda
(28,858 posts)And it also stands for Conspiracy Theory.
Evil smiley here.
bucolic_frolic
(43,128 posts)Roberts? Stepping down to balance the judiciary?
monkeyman1
(5,109 posts)leftieNanner
(15,082 posts)But if you're thinking about Clarence, I don't think he would ever resign - even with all the information coming out about his wife.
Republicans don't resign in shame any more. Oh, oops. SCOTUS is non partisan, right?
He will only leave his job "feet first" as they say.
wnylib
(21,432 posts)If there is evidence that he knew and kept quiet about it, could he be charged with conspiracy?
Of course he would not resign, but he is subject to the laws, too, so perhaps he could be pushed out.
leftieNanner
(15,082 posts)But the only way he will be pushed out is by the Senate - and Mitch would never do that. Takes 67 votes.
I would very pleased if Ginny and Clarence had to face consequences.
wnylib
(21,432 posts)Have charges brought against him for conspiracy with his wife's seditious activities. It would be difficult to rule on SC cases from a jail cell.
leftieNanner
(15,082 posts)May it be so.
getagrip_already
(14,708 posts)And he could argue that the exec branch has no jurisdiction over the operations of scotus, so he couldn't be prevented from voting.
There are only 3 ways to get rid of him: resignation, impeachment and conviction, or death.
wnylib
(21,432 posts)I just want the SOB gone.
getagrip_already
(14,708 posts)At least given what we know now. We aren't at the stage of justice before the drum head. At least I hope we aren't.
But if he were to die of natural causes, I would be as giddy as they were when rgb died.
monkeyman1
(5,109 posts)wnylib
(21,432 posts)By his silence, he is an accomplice. Charge them both.
monkeyman1
(5,109 posts)LoisB
(7,202 posts)will allow that. If he's not on the court, she has no power.
Raster
(20,998 posts)Fla Dem
(23,650 posts)liberalla
(9,238 posts)And as usual, I hope you're right!
Javaman
(62,517 posts)PufPuf23
(8,767 posts)sank Clarence from the USSC.
There are several recent justices that perjured in confirmation.
getagrip_already
(14,708 posts)Thomas...... is neither shameable nor impeachable.
Robert's might if he has had enough of being rough ridden by the usurper's.. The other gop crew would rather die than open a seat for biden.
ShazzieB
(16,370 posts)Last edited Tue Feb 22, 2022, 05:54 PM - Edit history (1)
Thomas is scum, for sure, but replacing Roberts would mean Biden getting to appoint a new Chief Justice, which is a pretty bfd.
I'd settle for replacing any of the conservatives on SCOTUS, though. Just to get the numbers more even.
Rebl2
(13,492 posts)Roberts step down? Is he ill? What did I miss.
ShazzieB
(16,370 posts)There's been no serious talk of Roberts quitting that I know of.
getagrip_already
(14,708 posts)That roberts is more likely to step down than thomas. roberts isn't happy at how he is being pushed around by the newcomers. They are openly ignoring and over riding him. They have made him irrelevant by voting as a block.
He surely doesn't like that and it threatens to trash his legacy, which was never very good to begin with.
It would have to be an I've had enough moment of monumental size, but it is not out of the realm of emotion and revenge.
Thomas on the other hand would rather cut off his wawa than let biden replace him. It isn't going to happen. No matter what.
Rebl2
(13,492 posts)wife keeps up her shenanigans and he is somehow connected with it , I wish he could be forced off the Supreme Court. Of course it wont happen.
getagrip_already
(14,708 posts)Just look at issues like conflict of interest, or outside income from speaking engagements, or even what might appear to be corrupt practices.
They just say they are acceptable to themselves and move on. Each member is accountable only to themselves. Doubly so since the senate will never convict one if impeached.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)He's gotten the court to consistently issue these very narrow rulings. In 2021 we had a string of news articles about all these unanimous decisions the court was releasing. In fact, last term they had 20% more unanimous decisions than the average term.
I think Roberts, like many SC justices, has an agenda, and he's not going to stop until he addresses what's on his agenda.
Just because we like to read into every word and nuance of an opinion or a comment to see if there are any cracks, doesn't mean the justices look at it the same way. But Roberts is looking at what's happening from a different political viewpoint than we are.
He may see the coming rollback of Roe or Affirmative Action as unfortunate, but I don't think he's sees it as a catastrophe like we do.
I could see Sotomayor retiring as a form of protest at the coming decisions from the court. In fact, I'd say that's more likely than anything else happening in the short term.
malaise
(268,930 posts)doubting Thomas!
nycbos
(6,034 posts)... I would say from your mouth to God's ear
Blue Owl
(50,349 posts)Proceed...
PJMcK
(22,031 posts)It seems a bit of a stretch but the corruption is in plain sight.
We'll see...
CTyankee
(63,903 posts)office?
malaise
(268,930 posts)CTyankee
(63,903 posts)I must review my Supreme Court justices. The ones appointed by a rethug. Hopefully, it is one of Trump's.
Response to CTyankee (Reply #48)
malaise This message was self-deleted by its author.
BannonsLiver
(16,369 posts)These predictions are literally wrong 100 percent of the time.
malaise
(268,930 posts)A little birdie toldme Herman would be cained and he was
BannonsLiver
(16,369 posts)Broken clocks and all that. Gets one right after making 100 air balls and then are so eaten up with my previous comment you have to come back a month and a half later to mention it!
malaise
(268,930 posts)Ah well