General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBiden has FROZEN 1 TRILLION DOLLARS OF RUSSIAN MONEY & Frozen Five RU Banks
Link to tweet
Lets just be clear about what Joe Biden has done here. He has FROZEN 1 TRILLION DOLLARS OF RUSSIAN MONEY. Stop obsessing over SWIFT and look at what
JoeBiden is doing.
Hes frozen five Russian banks. Tho SWIFT would have been simpler, this is a devastating blow to RU, & it's only the beginning.
Joe Biden and Boris Johnson have now locked Russian oligarchs out of most of the world banking system as the ruble slumps. This will hurt. And we can work on SWIFT.
In addition to the banks Joe Biden has slapped devastating technology sanctions on Russia that will prevent it from military and other scientific advancement.
These sanctions will crush Russias economy on their own. And Biden has still left some room for more.
Link to tweet
*****(
CANADA~
Trudeau also just announced more sanctions as well.
Trudeau announces sanctions to punish Russia for its 'horrific' attack on Ukraine
Canada aims sanctions at Russian oligarchs, banks
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbc.ca/amp/1.6362554
Trudeau said Canada will target 62 individuals and entities, including members of the Russian elite and their family members, the Russian paramilitary organization Wagner Group and major Russian banks, among others.
Canada will also direct its financial firepower at members of the Russian Security Council, including the country's defence, finance and justice ministers.
Effective immediately, Canada will stop issuing export permits for Russian products and cancel existing permits.
Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly said hundreds of permits covering goods worth more than $700 million will be immediately cancelled a blow to Russian companies that import valuable Canadian goods like aerospace parts, technology and minerals.
Trudeau announced a series of sanctions earlier this week after it became clear Putin was preparing for some sort of attack on Ukraine a country that has sought to more closely align itself with Western countries and the European Union in recent years.
MORE...
Ocelot II
(115,674 posts)wryter2000
(46,037 posts)Some people think he might be the richest man in the world.
Irish_Dem
(46,918 posts)He can lose a lot of money and still be ultra wealthy.
Lonestarblue
(9,971 posts)Im sure some is stashed in offshore accounts or maybe Swiss banks, but its probably spread around. His oligarchs most likely care more for their billions than for Ukraine. Perhaps theyll give the megalomaniac the Novichok treatment hes so fond of using.
Biden also needs to look at Bitcoin. I dont really understand how it works, but Ive read that its often used to hide money from drug dealing and sex traffickingspecialties of Russias billionaires. Is it even possible to freeze those assets?
Irish_Dem
(46,918 posts)That I do not know. But I guess if you have $200 billion, you can afford to hire the best experts to hide your money. Maybe gold and silver are options. But yes I am sure he has it all spread around.
I would think Putin let the oligarchs know to hide their money ahead of the invasion too.
No idea about Bitcoin, but yes it needs to be considered too.
lastlib
(23,213 posts)It has been tanking on the FX markets. Russian debt securities, too.
Irish_Dem
(46,918 posts)ahead of the invasion.
And certainly as a dictator, who may have to leave the country suddenly, rubles are not a wise choice anyway.
3825-87867
(843 posts)just may be the item (or EXTREME lack of an item!) that beats him! LOL!
wryter2000
(46,037 posts)The rich are weird about money. It's like the more they have, the more they want. "I have to live on a measly 1 billion?"
Irish_Dem
(46,918 posts)Last edited Thu Feb 24, 2022, 06:15 PM - Edit history (1)
I read a study once about multi-millionaires.
Very rich people. And every single one of them complained that they didn't have enough money and if they just had more, life would be good.
Then the researchers interviewed people who had these magical amounts of money, and guess what? They were not happy either, they didn't have quite enough money.
Crazy.
tblue37
(65,328 posts)Irish_Dem
(46,918 posts)DENVERPOPS
(8,810 posts)Using cyber warfare against all NATO nations and the U.S.
Irish_Dem
(46,918 posts)What ever that means, but doesn't sound good.
DENVERPOPS
(8,810 posts)It could be tragic, in so many different ways, and so many different areas.......
For years I have watched as "Cell Phones system shut down on east coast", or "a utility grid goes down for no reason in an area of the U.S." etc etc
And have always wondered if "someone" was testing their hacking capabilities.................
Irish_Dem
(46,918 posts)Makes you wonder if there is a little test going on.
Right Putin could target electrical grid, communications, etc.
DENVERPOPS
(8,810 posts)the banks, stock market, supply chains,......you name the possibilities.......It's anybody's guess.
Month's ago, they caught a specially designed Russian sub that was specifically built to set down on the ocean floor, straddling a communication cable. The kind of cable that connects different continents to each other.......And they surfaced, right above a huge cable that runs from Europe to the U.S.
The shit we don't know is going to be a major problem, you can bet on it...........
Irish_Dem
(46,918 posts)Yes there are Russian subs lurking around all the time.
And this is the stuff we know about.
What about the stuff we never thought about, or don't know about?
Right.
Putin is what mean SOB that is for sure and I would not put anything past him.
DENVERPOPS
(8,810 posts)And after working 40+ years towards this end, I suspect he knows it is his last "hurrah" and is going to take it to the very end.......
I, for one, refuse to live in a "Road Warrior" type world, I don't know about you or anyone else...........
Irish_Dem
(46,918 posts)He wants to shift global world power in his direction.
I am not sure any of this includes blowing up the world.
Unless of course the reports about serious illness and drugs are true, then I am not sure how far he would go.
I don't think many of us will survive a Road Warrior type world.
DENVERPOPS
(8,810 posts)there is no way he will stop at Ukraine....................
Irish_Dem
(46,918 posts)DENVERPOPS
(8,810 posts)going on in Russia by it's people, against what Putin is doing.
THOSE are the brave ones, knowing that their demonstrating will certainly end up with at a minimum their arrest, and then who knows what..............
Quite frankly, I am surprised Trump and the Republicans haven't organized demonstrations of their 70 million sheep, to cheer on Putin.........
Irish_Dem
(46,918 posts)To risk jail or worse, protesting the invasion.
I am not sure if Putin cares what the Russian people want or need.
Trump is probably figuring out how to make money and grift off the invasion.
DENVERPOPS
(8,810 posts)Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)for classified info and favors he sold while in office. I suspect he's one of the most corrupt politicians our country's ever had. He's got no scruples, but maybe a lot of rubles.
Irish_Dem
(46,918 posts)We will never know the extent or particulars of those crimes.
And yes he is one of the most corrupt and treasonous POTUS.
And yes he got rich.
radius777
(3,635 posts)and are prepared to retaliate and shut down their grids etc if they try that.
Irish_Dem
(46,918 posts)Good
smb
(3,471 posts)If (and he does) owe money to Putin - like the loan that Putin backed, then having Putin fall in defeat and get kicked out of office, may be the best thing that could happen. You don't owe money or favors to a dead man...
Hugin
(33,120 posts)Wicked Blue
(5,831 posts)He probably owes far more than he holds
Ocelot II
(115,674 posts)Hekate
(90,644 posts)twodogsbarking
(9,732 posts)I too wish him nothing.
Response to Budi (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
ProfessorGAC
(64,995 posts)I reviewed Russian economic data yesterday.
Those frozen assets represent nearly 25% of total capitalization of the COUNTRY.
They absolutely cannot sustain this. Your view has no basis in financial fact.
Response to ProfessorGAC (Reply #9)
Name removed Message auto-removed
jpljr77
(1,004 posts)Biden's response "Cannot comment at this time" is VERY interesting, in that it might indicate, 1) China is open to aligning with the West on this narrow occasion, basically dooming Russia, or 2) They're not open, but we're still actively negotiating.
Buddy2
(28 posts)If that is the hope. If Germany was attacked we wouldnt align with Russia. China will back Russia.
Response to jpljr77 (Reply #38)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Quixote1818
(28,928 posts)Polling shows there is more than enough willing to fight for an effective insurgency. There are a lot of unknowns right now. https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/02/22/ukraine-russia-afghanistan-defeat-insurgency/
AntiFascist
(12,792 posts)OPEC(+) has allied with Russia in that they won't be increasing production to stabilize the price of oil, thus Russia will gain from higher oil prices.
Response to AntiFascist (Reply #93)
Name removed Message auto-removed
thucythucy
(8,045 posts)The USSR and China engaged in an actual shooting war over border disputes in the 1970s.
A weakened Russia would actually be a very nice thing for China.
Claustrum
(4,845 posts)You don't sanction someone because you think they would do it.
Response to Claustrum (Reply #10)
Name removed Message auto-removed
The Jungle 1
(4,552 posts)They did not want to join and pay the dues. NATO supports NATO
This is an important point and is why we will not send troops.
Biden needs the country to understand this point.
lapucelle
(18,250 posts)The Jungle 1
(4,552 posts)They wanted to remain independent. Viktor Yanukovych was the president at the time. Yanukovych did end up leaving the country.
https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2010/03/29/ukraine-says-no-to-nato/
This article is by the well respected Pew Research Center. Written in March of 2010.
From the article:
When asked about what they would like to see for their countrys relationship with Russia, two-thirds (66%) believed that the countries should be independent, but friendly states with open borders, no visas and customs. Another 22% of Ukrainians believed that the countries should unite into one state. Few Ukrainians (8%) wanted relations to be the same as with other countries with closed borders, visas and customs. Pew Research Center
There is no way we should send in troops. The people said no to NATO and wanted to be "friendly" with russia.
NATO protects NATO. Be a member, pay your dues or fight your own wars. We can sell them all the arms they need and we could use the frozen russian money to pay for the arms
Understand this rant is what we need to shove down the throat of the right when they use the false attack of Biden being weak.
I have already shut down several rants about Biden being weak using this information. It is a solid argument.
The other argument is how trump did nothing to Iran when they bombed our base in Iraq. That was an actual attack on America. The little maggot did nothing! Have your arguments ready.
lapucelle
(18,250 posts)Paul Manafort was an advisor.
Yanukovych left the country (i.e. fled back to Russia) when he was ousted by a popular uprising.
Where does the part about not wanting to pay dues come from? What about the post-2010 history of Ukraine and NATO?
AlexSFCA
(6,137 posts)vanlassie
(5,670 posts)gristy
(10,667 posts)Otherwise, Russia could have claimed they were defending themselves in response. Europe and the US waited and waited and waited. Putin showed his hand by invading, and it is now clear to everyone that our collective actions are in defensive response to that invasion.
brush
(53,764 posts)It's only recently that the Russians started the build up of forces on Ukraine's border.
Response to brush (Reply #11)
Name removed Message auto-removed
brush
(53,764 posts)a mistake the west decided to live with, which is nothing to be proud of, but these new actions in the north and south of Ukraine which seems to point to a takeover of the entire country is an entirely different matter.
Response to brush (Reply #29)
Name removed Message auto-removed
brush
(53,764 posts)Last edited Thu Feb 24, 2022, 05:14 PM - Edit history (1)
True enough. This is another matter and has fundamentally changed things. It's a dangerous time. If sanctions don't pressure Putin to back down, what's left?
NaATO forces to the country? We have to know that is extremely dangerous too as NATO troops v Russian ones could be a slippery slope to nuclear war.
Who's prepared for that?
Response to brush (Reply #43)
Name removed Message auto-removed
ancianita
(36,023 posts)And none of these ongoing sanctions count the ongoing enforcement of the Magnitsky Act, either.
Putin's move is to show that with or without Trump he's desperate to regain former wealth, and the stoppage of the Nord Stream is another big blow.
brush
(53,764 posts)troops raises the specter of nuclear war. Are you prepared for nukes taking out DC, NYC, London, Paris, Moscow, St. Petersburg?
It's a dangerous time and there's no playing around now. It's a test of resolve.
ancianita
(36,023 posts)The owner of Wagner group is sanctioned, too, along with both members of his family. I'm telling you that the forces of instability will decamp, and the forces that come from Russian families will not be sent in harm's way because it will bring the Russian people down on Putin.
Biden's moves won't call for nukes. Just saber rattling. We'll give Putin a scenario so that he can make a graceful exit, and then slowly unfreeze some assets. WE will be in the catbird seat. Not Putin.
And Russians will also help make sure of that; they love their children, too.
brush
(53,764 posts)Say what you're getting at. Do you want troops on the ground against Russian troops, or what you're proposing, yet more but different sanctions that might work? No one knows. But we'll find out.
ancianita
(36,023 posts)So I was bringing back the focus that sanctions did exist over Crimea and do work. They worked in that they held him off Ukraine for over eight years. This time, probably longer. That is why he got Trump to entangle Biden and the Ukraine, to F with them both.
Looking ahead, Putin's got a political challenge in 2024 when he breaks his word to the Russian people that he would step down. Add this setback to that, and we might be witness to something unprecedented in our lifetimes.
Because if Biden is up to what I think he is, he's not going to let Russia on one side, and China on the other, slowly tighten a pincer like grip on us and the West. Biden's seen too-little-too-late and has learned a few things.
brush
(53,764 posts)Ukraine anytime during the disastrous four trump years, as trump would've just called him a genius then too and welcomed him to take anything he wanted. Why did he hold back? Maybe he thought he had plenty of time as trump would win again, maybe establish a lifetime dictatorship and they could do whatever they wanted in the world.
It may be, as rumored, that Putin is sick and doesn't think he has much time left since his promise to resign and since trump lost, so he's trying to pull Ukraine back into a Russian empire of sorts. Looks like Belarus is already pulled back and if he gets away with taking Ukraine back, the Balkans might be next.
At first I thought he was trying to re-constitute the USSR but now I think it's to cement his legacy as the one who re-formed the Russian empire.
ancianita
(36,023 posts)the costs of getting to and setting up preparedness in just the surrounding of Ukraine's border.
Regardless, he also held back because of bad judgment. He believed Trump would win, then 81 million of us smashed that big lie they first convinced themselves of.
The way I see his future is this: the older soviet states might lead him to think he has some of his old empire "back," but one chance, and they'd slip out the door like an abused spouse. And the Baltics? They will definitely fight to the death and never go back. He knows he can no more just make up his own version of history than Trump can.
The sanctions are having just as strong a psychological effect as the missing frozen wealth is.
brush
(53,764 posts)the old, cold war-era KGBers left in their government.
ancianita
(36,023 posts)Pluvious
(4,309 posts)Even though it was a song about the Soviets, Sting called them Russians.
Heres to hoping their protests become a tsunami
PortTack
(32,754 posts)President Biden in his press conference just now says he feels that with the worldwide sanctions now in place Putin will have few options to continue to finance his war. He even went as far as to say a few months
Response to Name removed (Reply #2)
lagomorph777 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Scrivener7
(50,949 posts)Um..... no.
mcar
(42,302 posts)PortTack
(32,754 posts)President Biden said the sanctions they have enacted would be worse than using SWIFT and hes right
JCMach1
(27,556 posts)...one or more the allies balked on this
PortTack
(32,754 posts)JCMach1
(27,556 posts)Budi
(15,325 posts)Cha
(297,148 posts)Budi
(15,325 posts)No one heard of SWIFT till Biden had to choose another way to invoke sanctions.
Equally damaging & since it involved another Nation's decision, he acted beyond expectations with the sanctions he & his allies put together.
No simple task & SWIFT may come later.
I don't know what the poo pooing is all about.
These beginning sanctions are directed at the very center of the billionare oligarch's heartbeat.$$$$
A damned good start. Biden is a freakin foreign policy wizard
Cha
(297,148 posts)In real time.. not 8 years later down the line after he's gone. Like what happened with President Obama!
I mentioned before.. someone on here said if they ejected Putin from SWIFT it would be an Act of War and maybe they weren't ready for that yet." After I read would it was I see what they meant.
Cha
(297,148 posts)Russia has committed a crime against peace, he said in an address to the nation.
Zeman had previously made news by calling Russias 2014 annexation of the Ukrainian Crimean Peninsula a fait accompli.
SNIP//
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=16395094
https://www.yahoo.com/news/invading-ukraine-putin-loses-allies-201605774.html
TY
JCMach1
(27,556 posts)Rat them out...
I doubt he can say what he truly thinks.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,393 posts)Amishman
(5,555 posts)still not nearly enough.
Ohio Joe
(21,752 posts)It is too early to cut them off from SWIFT.
FoxNewsSucks
(10,429 posts)Now seize the yachts.
Hit every single russian oligarch living outside Russia.
Bev54
(10,047 posts)Captain Zero
(6,801 posts)No Oligarch travel in the USA.
littlemissmartypants
(22,631 posts)Rocknation
(44,576 posts)rocknation
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Hav
(5,969 posts)it doesn't sound like 1 trillion was frozen. Just the assets they had in the US.
maxrandb
(15,320 posts)and deport those residents back to Mother Russia?
underpants
(182,769 posts)💩
world wide wally
(21,740 posts)SergeStorms
(19,193 posts)whichever one of Saddam Trump's kids he is.
OMGWTF
(3,951 posts)viva la
(3,286 posts)I understand that will create some vacancies in Trump Tower.
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)Bev54
(10,047 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,888 posts)AlexSFCA
(6,137 posts)the ONLY way to stop putin is to have russian people in millions rebel against the regime.
Bev54
(10,047 posts)ancianita
(36,023 posts)Joe's gonna shove Putin into accepting any offer Joe makes.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)I suppose he could accuse us of waging economic warfare on the Russian Federation. I hope it's not the case, but this could escalate from where it is very, very quickly.
Meadowoak
(5,545 posts)SergeStorms
(19,193 posts)go back extorting money from the Saudis again, if they have anything left after Jared got through with them.
BootinUp
(47,141 posts)What is China gonna do to help Putin.
dwayneb
(768 posts)Absolutely we should be worried about any sort of cooperation with China. There is no chance that the West could possibly remain intact if those two powers ever became allies of necessity.
In my opinion, while Biden's sanctions are necessary and powerful, they are not enough.
If we really expect to stop Putin we need to be preparing to send many more ground troops and equipment to Europe - now, not later. Russia knows that territory cannot be controlled form the air - it requires boots on the ground. That is why they have been pouring their money into strengthening the troops that were sent to Ukraine.
No one seems to be willing to acknowledge this truth. Although I have to believe that the generals in DOD understand this very well. We just aren't hearing about it.
Justice matters.
(6,925 posts)Confiscate and nationalize each and every asset that's been frozen. End of their fun mobster's party.
Issue a clear warning first: Condition is, they get together to rid the world of that megalomaniac putin by any means necessary and stop that mindless aggression.
COL Mustard
(5,897 posts)Lots of Russian assets in Londongrad.
gab13by13
(21,304 posts)is to keep our allies united. Germany and other EU countries are opposed to banning SWIFT from Russia because it would cut off Russian fossil fuels to the EU. I believe this is why Republicans are pushing president Biden to use SWIFT, they have ulterior motives.
AllaN01Bear
(18,154 posts)should also reinstate no us buisness held by foregin powers .
lastlib
(23,213 posts)Too bad, so sad.....sleep with dogs, get fleas.
AllaN01Bear
(18,154 posts)NQAS
(10,749 posts)Several people asked why he didn't freeze Russia out of Swift. I thought the same thing. I use Swift regularly and I really don't know how I would pay for stuff if I didn't have it available. But he repeatedly said that the sanctions he imposed have far greater impact. And they still asked about Swift. And he repeated that the sanctions he imposed are stronger.
You know full well on the fake news and propaganda circuit tonight they will call Biden weak because he didn't lock Russia out of Swift.
It certainly looks like the US and allies have pretty much locked Russia out of international trade.
I did my bit locally. I asked the state liquor commission to stop selling Russian products. True, the Russian companies already have this money, and probably not in Russia, but I think it would be a good symbolic move. I don't know if they did it.
NBachers
(17,103 posts)lastlib
(23,213 posts)That's the one I care most about. Turn it into a hollow shell.
Volaris
(10,270 posts)Aid to Ukrainian refugees who want to get the hell out, and buying anti-tank rounds for the ones who want to stay and put up a fight.
But that's probably considered theft, on some legal level lol.
mcar
(42,302 posts)Suddenly it's the media's new "Biden sucks" chew toy.
These are devastating sanctions. Given the anti-war protests already happening in Russia, this is not going to go well for pooty-poot.
Budi
(15,325 posts)No one in the press ever spoke the word until now.
Thank god Joe Biden is leading the decisions of this moment.
He's got some powerful strong allies around the world who know & trust him. They are a united front.
Cha
(297,148 posts)mean much.. I don't have a TV.
I had just looked it up, though.. someone on this thread said that "..ejecting Putin from SWIFT would be an act of war and maybe they weren't ready for that yet.."
I respect and trust PJB.. Not the media****** AT All.
Now knock him of SWIFT.
Trueblue1968
(17,205 posts)A la' .... The Twilight Saga .......
。・ :・゚★,。・ :・゚☆ Let the Russian people free 。・ :・゚★,。・ :・゚☆
This is what i was doing before i drifted off to sleep last night. I was the leader of the Vampire Team.
NoMoreRepugs
(9,412 posts)We are talking about the Biden/Harris team here - not the Rump/Pence shitstain collection of misfits.
We must freeze his Republican Ass-ettes
Emrys
(7,232 posts)Based on this analysis, Biden's on the right track:
Blocking Russian access to SWIFT may not be the most effective measure:
This thread from mid-January hasn't dated badly:
As the Russia/ NATO/US/OSCE talks didnt make real progress, its important to look again at this possibility. Can they cut Russia from SWIFT & would this be Armageddon for Russia?
Bill Browder
@Billbrowder
BREAKING: Draft Russian sanctions bill coming out of the senate includes cutting Russia off of the SWIFT banking system if they invade Ukraine. The US used this against Iran and it set them back to the economic dark ages.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/senate-democrats-with-white-house-backing-unveil-russia-sanctions-bill/2022/01/12/06a4f41e-735e-11ec-8ec6-9d61f7afbe17_story.html
Good & difficult question.
Lets start with basics: whats SWIFT? Its simply a messaging system. A chat app if you want! But it only sends special messages designed for cross-border financial transactions for banks globally, for the 11k banks that are part of the network.
Is it possible to cut Russia from it? The US tried in 2014, and the answer they got from SWIFT was we will not make unilateral decisions to disconnect institutions from its network as a result of political pressure. In your face.
Thats because SWIFT is not American, of course. Actually, its a cooperative society based in Belgium under Belgian law! Seriously! So the owners are the members of the networks, with shares reallocated on a regular basis based on flows.
So, SWIFT must follow EU laws, not US ones which doesnt mean it cant disconnect a country, like it dd with Iran in 2018. This was driven by US sanctions, with no obligation coming from the EU, but, again, they were not forced to do it.
What about Russia? The 291 Russian members represent 1.5% of SWIFT flows (you gotta sell that oil!), ranked 13th globally on all SWIFT messages and 6th on payment messages!
That Is a LOT of messages that could be disrupted, on both ends, and a lot of money (prob ?800bn$/y).
Would cutting SWIFT access stop all those payments? No, but it would make significantly more difficult. There are other ways to send payments messages including very old type stuff! (no, not carrier pigeons) but it would be difficult to convince western banks to use them.
Russia is aware of the risk and has alternative routes: SFPS (a system it designed with mostly Russian & CIS banks) and domestic payment systems that were launched after Visa & Mastercard cut them off in 2014. But Western banks would need to join.
What this suggests is that, ultimately, what matters is banning Western (US+EU+Swiss+UK) banks from dealing with Russia - cutting from SWIFT is just making those deals harder + if done only by the US, we could get the same ridiculous attempts of the EU to bypass the sanctions
Remember this?
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/joint-statement-on-the-new-mechanism-to-facilitate-trade-with-iran
So ridiculous that it has almost never been used despite being announced with great fanfare! (the first deal was to send medical equipment to fight Covid.)
Whats the bottom line here: either you have coordinated US/EU sanctions which ban banks from trading with Russia, or you get into complicated stuff that makes transactions messy and difficult, but not impossible. And can you ban all transactions with US/EU banks?
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1483039324358729730.html
Budi
(15,325 posts)Thanks
tinrobot
(10,895 posts)Cha
(297,148 posts)This is What PJB has been Doing Behind the Scends!
dwayneb
(768 posts)These sanctions are absolutely necessary. Most experts agree, that over time, these will have a dramatic effect on Putin's ability to wage war and to maintain his military strength for an extended campaign of aggression.
The question remains though, whether these sanctions are enough.
Based on our knowledge of both WW1 and WW2, the US and the UK were caught with their pants down, and didn't take the aggression of Germany seriously until it was a crisis.
Why are we not sending 50,000 - 100,000 troops immediately to the European theater, on the Eastern Front of NATO?
Why aren't our aircraft carriers and battleships moving to key positions in the Mediterranean iand in the Atlantic surrounding Europe so they are ready when needed?
Maybe these things are in the works and our DOD is keeping them under wraps. Hopefully that is the reason why Biden more or less dodged this question.
Anyone who thinks that Putin is going to stop with Ukraine is a fool. Once upon a time, I thought that Putin would never attack a NATO country. Now that we are into this and we see Putin's level of megalomania it seems clear that he will stop at nothing. We should absolutely be ready to defend NATO and we will need the troops and equipment in place to accomplish that.
One thing to bear in mind that most folks don't know. Russia has more ground troops and artillery than the USA; they have more nukes than all of the Western World combined. The only way the US is superior is with air power.
Putin knew what he was doing in regard to the timing of the invasion.
Germany had just shelved plans to develop a LNG terminal.
It's still winter in Europe. Not spring/summer.
Germany and others have limited non-Russian energy options.
So oil keeps flowing, and SWIFT is still available to pay for it.
dlk
(11,552 posts)I have every confidence he will continue to lead in this most effective way! Now lets send more military aid to Ukraine and start confiscating Russian oligarchs yachts and houses.
BlueWavePsych
(2,635 posts)Budi
(15,325 posts)bdamomma
(63,836 posts)Putin is also aligning himself with Saudi Arabia for increasing oil prices. Cut that off too.
halfulglas
(1,654 posts)One of the biggest differences is that Crimea was relatively bloodless. Russia had infiltrated so many of the Little Green Men that it was almost over before it began. They had grabbed so many of the key objectives without paying any price. The coffins returning to Mother Russia were almost nil and economically Russia got their access to the Black Sea. There was little mourning of Russian mothers so Russians believed so much of the propaganda that it really belonged to Russia. This is different. Russians are killing their brothers and cousins and the cost is going to be much greater, economically and in blood. The Russian public is going to feel this much more than 8 years ago.
Budi
(15,325 posts)If Putin thought he'd just repeat an easy in-&-done with Ukraine as he did in Crimea, he was dead wrong.
The world is watching & we're all horrified.
Putin wil die a failure someday, as will his 1 friend, Trump.
IL Dem
(813 posts)Couldn't we confiscate that?