If Nato forces decide to go in and stop

[Beachnutt]

the little bastard it probably would be a top secret mission, I mean you don't warn the enemy before you take em out do you ?

[SoonerPride]

1. NATO countries won't intercede

Openly or covertly.

[lagomorph777]

2. We are openly interceding.

If by "intercede" you only include discharge of weapons, then no.

But we are providing weapons and cutting off Putin's cash flow.

I have no doubt we are also covertly providing intel and cyber support.

[Happy Hoosier]

3. I am almost 100% certain that U.S. and likely other NATO SpecOps....

... are already in Ukraine.

At teh least, they are training and I would be surprised if they weren't conducting active operations.

[PortTack]

4. President Zelenskyy has made it clear he does not want NATO or US boots on the ground

And with good reason. US and or NATO against Russia would leave the country a bombed out wasteland, or worse

[brooklynite]

5. What in the world are you talking about?

Sending NATO in "secrectly" and engaging militarily with Russia? Seriously?

[MineralMan]

6. Well, many people are talking a lot about things they

don't know anything about right now. That always happens.

[Ghost Dog]

7. There are some unreliable people running the British

government, though...

(Unreliable because lazy, incompetent and corrupt).

[DetroitLegalBeagle]

8. Too many people are mixing fantasy and reality

Seems many think Hollywood and Tom Clancy books are good representations of how things work in the real world.

[Celerity]

9. yes, there was even a discussion based off of a Clancy novel scenario