General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRussian thermobaric "vacuum bombs" launcher seen by CNN team in Ukraine
A Russian thermobaric multiple rockets launcher has been spotted by CNN team south of Belgorod, Russia, near the Ukrainian border early Saturday afternoon.
The TOS-1 or TOS-1A Multiple Rocket Launcher seen by CNN is capable of launching rockets with thermobaric warheads.
There is no evidence that thermobaric weapons have been used in the conflict in Ukraine.
These types of weapons do not use conventional ammunition. Instead, they are filled with high-temperature, high-pressure explosive. They are sometimes called vacuum bombs because they suck in the oxygen from the surrounding air to generate a powerful explosion and a large pressure wave that can have enormous destructive effects.
(snip)
https://www.cnn.com/europe/live-news/ukraine-russia-news-02-26-22/h_0050ad4a0b55a2fdd9753d00b44efc40
Pachamama
(16,887 posts)May Putin burn
marie999
(3,334 posts)The UK has used them in Syria.
JanMichael
(24,885 posts)lapucelle
(18,252 posts)marie999
(3,334 posts)lapucelle
(18,252 posts)Isn't that what people call "whataboutism"?
For someone doesn't "know anything about geopolitics", you seem well-informed.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/117814759#post13
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The "answer" you propose is ... interesting.
marie999
(3,334 posts)Not well informed enough to know that Putin would do something really stupid. That is not the Putin that took power in 1999.
lapucelle
(18,252 posts)Up thread #6.
marie999
(3,334 posts)As far as I know, it would depend on how they were used to determine if it is a war crime.
lapucelle
(18,252 posts)the war crime question you, in fact, had asked.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Russia has a decades-long history of deploying thermobaric bombs in Afghanistan, Syria, and in Russia itself. Why not ask if those instances were war crimes?
Why mention the UK at all? It rather muddies the waters, given that the present discussion involves what Putin might be planning right now rather than what might have happened years ago in another part of the world.
And why would one even ask the question if one already knew that the answer would depend on "how they were used"?
Pachamama
(16,887 posts)Maraya1969
(22,479 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)femmedem
(8,201 posts)CNN knows right where it is. If that isn't worth sending in manpower to destroy it, I don't know what is.
ProfessorGAC
(65,013 posts)...of any military or weapons consultants.
Because they're not "vacuum" bombs and the don't work by "sucking air" in from the outside.
The use a venturi to help get a fuel/air mixture of about 10% as they descend slowly to create a flammable cloud. Creates what fire safety experts call a BLEVE. (Boiling Liquid/Evaporating Liquid Explosion)
A charge less than a hand grenade triggers the blast.
There's no "vacuum" sucking in surrounding air.
If the advisors are telling the reporters that, they need to have their contract terminated.
Uncle Joe
(58,355 posts)nonetheless they would be some exceptionally brutal weapons against masses of people whether civilian or military.
ProfessorGAC
(65,013 posts)For any given size device, only nukes do more destruction.
I was at a BLEVE demonstration in the New Mexico desert about 15 years ago.
One of the tests was ethylene oxide. 50kg of ethylene oxide dispersed using a pump through an aspirator was set off with 6" of primacord. (About enough to pop the windows out of car.)
The fireball was 400-450' in diameter. We felt the concussion & the radiant heat from around 500 yards away.
Nasty weapon.
gldstwmn
(4,575 posts)Link to tweet
?t=PL5reEQZH0VwaYKENU9j3A&s=19
ProfessorGAC
(65,013 posts)With my own eyes. I did a fair amount of work in the chemistry of detonation & the manufacture of detonatable organics.
My involvement in the latter was in reaction rate control to make the synthesis safer.
But, in that area, one gets to know a lot of people who actually use these compounds, both civilian & military.
The stockpile I saw were big ones. Around 1,500kg of EO in each device. That would make one heck of a bang!
As I said above, I saw an intentionally detonated BLEVE of about 110# of EO.
Quite the blast.
PCIntern
(25,543 posts)Thank you. Im tired of know-nothing amateurs who pontificate upon subjects of which they have no working knowledge.
I deal with them everyday in my job. Frustrating
.
WarGamer
(12,440 posts)BGBD
(3,282 posts)Spend a day with everyone talking about these terrible weapons coming in and the next day have video of it smoldering, overturned in the street would be pretty great propoganda. It would be one of my top targets if I were in the Ukrainian military.
Uncle Joe
(58,355 posts)but you have to be careful/shrewd about it because they're heavily guarded.
BGBD
(3,282 posts)and Russians look exactly alike. Sure would be a shame if th Ukrainians managed to get their hands on some Russian uniforms....
that could get confusing...