General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAP poll: Majority harbor prejudice against blacks
Racial attitudes have not improved in the four years since the United States elected its first black president, an Associated Press poll finds, as a slight majority of Americans now express prejudice toward blacks whether they recognize those feelings or not.
<snip>
Racial prejudice has increased slightly since 2008 whether those feelings were measured using questions that explicitly asked respondents about racist attitudes, or through an experimental test that measured implicit views toward race without asking questions about that topic directly.
In all, 51 percent of Americans now express explicit anti-black attitudes, compared with 48 percent in a similar 2008 survey.
When measured by an implicit racial attitudes test, the number of Americans with anti-black sentiments jumped to 56 percent, up from 49 percent during the last presidential election. In both tests, the share of Americans expressing pro-black attitudes fell.
<snip>
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/27/14740413-ap-poll-majority-harbor-prejudice-against-blacks?lite
malaise
(295,796 posts)by M$Greedia, in religious and educational institutions and in some homes.
cali
(114,904 posts)certainly in some educational institutions. But mostly it's at home.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)How many fucking times have people chimed in with: It's not about race?
The racists are scared and coming out of the woodwork.
malaise
(295,796 posts)even by people we like, it was promoted. You do not repeat lies.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)WOW. You are so naive. The MSM gives people like Sununu a platform to spew their racism and you don't think the MSM promotes this shit?
Unreal.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)When I was young, my teachers and other leaders would not tolerate nasty comments about black people. However, white males typically told "racist" jokes. It is going to take a long time to extract that attitude from our culture.
Now I recall, the physics teacher once told us a racist jokes.
DHelix
(89 posts)Change is never about changing the opinions of adults who've done things a certain way or beleived certain things their whole lives. change and progress is always about the next generation growing up in a world where something previously taboo seems normal.
It's like anti-smoking ads. I have a friend who said to me the other day, "I don't know why they bother with all these gross pictures. I'll still smoke anyway." I told him it wasn't about his generation or people who were already addicted. Society's given up on the idea of changing your attitudes about smoking. It's for the next group of kids thinking about smoking and in that way it HAS worked because younger people smoke less. Same goes for seatbelt PSAs. My grandpa never wore a seatbelt. Same goes for drinking and driving. My grandpa's generation did it all the time. The PSAs aimed at changing each of these things was about the next generation and we have seen progress in each of these areas in many ways. Same goes for women's rights in the workplace. Still a long way to go but people forget what those first trailblazing career women had to put up with. Generation by generation more women have grown up in dual income families and realize that college and work is something they're interested in too.
Jackie Robinson probably made some white baseball fans upset during his era. Racism probably increased then too. But flash forward decades and generation after generation just came to expect and accept black athletes in the game and now kids have posters of them up on their walls.
Change is generational. Kids today are far more environmentally conscious than my generation was. Kids today are far more tolerant towards gays than my generation (and especially my parent's generation was). So, it's important to always remember that these surveys include the types of people who'll never see the light but its their kids and their grandkids who will and that's how change and progress works.
coldwaterintheface
(137 posts)knows this already. What a waste of time, money and resources to verfiy common knowledge.
rsweets
(310 posts)we have not been at this long enough to have lost the
visceral response, that lives in all of us, to people that are different
than ourselves. I was 16 when we started fighting for the rights of all
people, And it's not like everyone just bought into it.. hell i still work
at it all the time, but i know my children were not told any race was any better
than any other.
actually I'm surprised as hell that anywhere near 49 percent have open their minds
a percentage point per year ... pretty good, don't you think
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)except that would pretty much be all people. It's not like white people are all the same as me.
The world should be so lucky.
caraher
(6,359 posts)What it shows is how slow change is. Note that the results have an uncertainty of 4 percentage points, so although the numbers are worse than 4 years ago, they haven't changed by a statistically significant amount. Which I guess is good news in the face of the cover Tea Party idiocy has given racist attitudes over the past few years - it hasn't yet had a measurable negative large-scale effect.
Beachy
(7 posts)Sadly, in the last few years(since 2008), I have picked up on more rascism(mostly from wealthier, older people in this area--I live in coastal New England). I grew up in New England and never really heard rascist remarks or attitudes growing up.
What has changed? I believe that the GOP and the "Tea Party" have made it acceptable for some.
TBF
(36,577 posts)a frenzy. The Trayvon Martin case alone, and the way the story was told on FAUX news probably accounts for the percentage rising a bit.
This is where a decent law comes into play. When news is clearly non-fiction the show should be labeled in some way - stating "for entertainment purposes only and has no basis in reality" - it should be on scrolling on the screen at all times.
malaise
(295,796 posts)is when the likes of GEM$NBComcast et al repeat it over and over.
When you repeat lies you spread them.
TBF
(36,577 posts)and then becomes more legitimized. All the more reason that FOX should come with a warning label. Borowitz and Daily Show, branded as comedians, are more accurate than FOX.
malaise
(295,796 posts)and then express surprise when people believe it.
Harriety
(298 posts)These polls are mostly done on land line phones not cell phones. I can't think of anyone under 40 who uses those anymore. Therefore, most of these polls are irrelevant. As a 62 year old woman looking to the younger generations, I hope you stay strong and true to just causes. Many people from my generation traded their ideals for personal gain. The hippies who claimed to be anti war and pro equality became yuppies obsessed with making money.
eallen
(2,982 posts)For that matter, it includes many blacks.
Americans of my generation grew up in a culture that imbued racism against blacks into our bones, in the same way that it imbued patriotism, love of Halloween and Christmas, and football. No matter how much we consciously reject that and work against it, some of it still lurks.
That's not a sin. We can't change the culture of the past, or how it affected us as children, or what remnants that leaves in our subconscious. The sin is the pretense otherwise, which says we can ignore its current effects and stop fighting those.
Suji to Seoul
(2,035 posts)Talk about fucking denial of reality. Americans are more in the closet about their racism, but as a people, we are still an extremely racism, xenophobic, jingoistic, sexist, bigoted society.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)think the AP number is high.
Obama faced a similar situation in 2008, the survey then found.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/27/14740413-ap-poll-majority-harbor-prejudice-against-blacks
Oh my! Racist in the Democratic Party? Where have I heard that before?
highplainsdem
(61,926 posts)those forums.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)HipChick
(25,612 posts)in the US, and they will tell you what they go through on an on-going basis..
cali
(114,904 posts)uponit7771
(93,532 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)Mitt has absolutely nothing to offer the American voter, except he is white.
Now I believe this survey.
Seems prejudice is applied to whites as well.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Zax2me
(2,515 posts)So racial attitudes have gone the wrong way since he was elected?
I don't think this is how things were supposed to happen.
What went wrong.
Rwing talk radio has been around for decades.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)The racist bastards in the GOP have one everything to inflame overt racism.
And I'll say it, both Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are overt racists in my humble opinion. At least John McCain was taken aback with the crap in 2008.
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)That was in 2008.
Mittens makes jokes about birth certificates.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)people like to pretend that racism isn't a big part of Mitt's campaign.
Sununu Did EXACTLY What Romney Wanted: To BLACKEN Powell & Obama
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021644202
win_in_06
(1,764 posts)when it is said that Voter ID laws particularly impact the black vote. The inferrence is that blacks find it more difficult to acquire an ID than other groups. Fact is, it will impact the votes of many.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Most people, including most white liberals, will show racist attitudes on the implicit test even if they consciously insist they are not racist.
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)White liberals are generally more aware of racism than white conservatives, but that doesn't mean they don't have (unconscious/subconscious) racist attitudes.
I'm always baffled when people say that there obviously is no racism anymore since we have a black president. It's like, "Do you have eyes and/or ears? What world are you living in?"
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)many times throughout my life about feelings, thoughts or actions that are irrational reactions based on race.
sadbear
(4,340 posts)I suspect I, as a white person, would be prejudiced against whites.
Zax2me
(2,515 posts)Okay...
SweetieD
(1,673 posts)etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)Thank you Tea-Baggers for bringing out the worst in my country
toddmiller
(75 posts)The story is not valid because the reporters apparently never read the actual research report. As a researcher, I was surprised to find that every point made in the article was completely false. The sample was biased toward groups that are more racist including Birthers, older people and conservatives. Given the sample, one could never infer whether Americans or more or less prejudice now. The study also claimed the changes occurred over 4 years but the research report said two years and that no changes within the margin of sampling error occurred. THAT IS THE RESEARCHERS SAID PREJUDICE HADN'T INCREASE. Except the did find that over four year it had increased among self-identified republicans. The measure reported is invalid for a number of reasons and has been criticized by other researchers. You can read about all the problems in three places
https://www.impartial-review.com/stories/racism-increased-among-republicans-in-the-past-two-years-press-misreports-story
http://www.buzzfeed.com/theimpartialreviewnews/how-a-false-news-story-spreads-across-the-main-str-7wch
http://my.firedoglake.com/toddq/2012/11/03/three-hundred-misleading-media-stories-about-american-racism-thanks-to-the-ap/