Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ck4829

(35,077 posts)
Tue Mar 8, 2022, 06:40 PM Mar 2022

Should all those private citizens suing anyone who helps with abortions be paid in rubles?

Like in Texas and now Missouri is getting in on it...

The pattern emerges whenever a Republican-led state imposes new restrictions on abortion: People seeking the procedure cross state lines to find treatment in places with less-restrictive laws.

Now, a prominent antiabortion lawmaker in Missouri, where thousands of residents have traveled to next-door Illinois to receive abortions since Missouri passed one of the country’s strictest abortion laws in 2019, believes she has found a solution.

An unusual new provision, introduced by state Rep. Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R), would allow private citizens to sue anyone who helps a Missouri resident obtain an abortion out of state, using the novel legal strategy behind the restrictive Texas law that has banned abortions after six weeks of pregnancy since September.

Coleman has attached the measure as an amendment to several abortion-related bills that have made it through committee and are waiting to be heard on the floor of the House of Representatives.

https://archive.ph/pKSdF


Rubles!

Buckets, wheelbarrows, and trucks. All full of rubles.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should all those private citizens suing anyone who helps with abortions be paid in rubles? (Original Post) ck4829 Mar 2022 OP
Brilliant! Mme. Defarge Mar 2022 #1
I know it's ridiculous but KentuckyWoman Mar 2022 #2
TY for this! fierywoman Mar 2022 #3
Goddamn right... Moostache Mar 2022 #4

KentuckyWoman

(6,681 posts)
2. I know it's ridiculous but
Tue Mar 8, 2022, 06:53 PM
Mar 2022

I'd like to require the person doing the suing to provide a list of every intimate partner they ever had and prove it was for the sole purpose of procreation only. In addition no birth control of any kind was ever used and for the men especially, no ... ahem ... partnerless emissions.

Moostache

(9,895 posts)
4. Goddamn right...
Tue Mar 8, 2022, 06:59 PM
Mar 2022

Men in Missouri should be required to show that ALL ejaculations were done with the sole intent of procreation and anything else is criminal conduct, genocidal acts of mass murder.

Jerking off? Thats 5 to 10...
Getting a blow job? Thats 10-20...
Pulling out? Thats 3-4 with good behavior...but any prison shower activity is a LIFE SENTENCE!!!

These fools are too much to suffer lightly.
Where the fuck does the "small" part of small government pick back up?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should all those private ...