HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Sanders camp quietly push...

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 10:54 AM

Sanders camp quietly pushes Khanna presidential bid

Politico

Top figures from Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign are privately encouraging Ro Khanna to run for president in 2024 if Joe Biden doesn’t seek a second term, giving the California congressman an important stamp of approval from progressives as the party looks to its post-Biden future.

Jeff Weaver, Sanders’ former presidential campaign manager, and Mark Longabaugh, a senior adviser to Sanders during his 2016 bid, have both urged Khanna to consider a campaign in the event Biden declines to run again, according to a person familiar with their discussions.

Democratic officeholders are reluctant to speak publicly about their ambitions in a potential open race in 2024 out of concern that they could undermine the president, who has said he plans to campaign for a second term if he is in good health. There are also sensitivities surrounding Vice President Kamala Harris, who is atop the list of possible candidates but faces skepticism from some party insiders who fear she cannot win a general election.

But a growing list of Democratic governors, senators and House members are turning their attention to the possibility of a primary in two years that doesn’t include Biden, given the president’s advanced age and dismal approval ratings. Roughly half of Americans don’t expect Biden, now 79, will run for a second term, according to a recent Wall Street Journal poll.

91 replies, 2938 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 91 replies Author Time Post
Reply Sanders camp quietly pushes Khanna presidential bid (Original post)
brooklynite Mar 2022 OP
MineralMan Mar 2022 #1
bullimiami Mar 2022 #4
JoeOtterbein Mar 2022 #86
JustAnotherGen Mar 2022 #2
Maru Kitteh Mar 2022 #3
JohnSJ Mar 2022 #5
gibraltar72 Mar 2022 #13
JohnSJ Mar 2022 #22
gibraltar72 Mar 2022 #27
JohnSJ Mar 2022 #28
gibraltar72 Mar 2022 #29
TheProle Mar 2022 #79
Budi Mar 2022 #37
JohnSJ Mar 2022 #40
JustAnotherGen Mar 2022 #63
Beastly Boy Mar 2022 #6
Cartoonist Mar 2022 #7
AZProgressive Mar 2022 #10
Cartoonist Mar 2022 #17
AZProgressive Mar 2022 #20
JohnSJ Mar 2022 #23
Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2022 #54
Cartoonist Mar 2022 #88
Demsrule86 Mar 2022 #8
AZProgressive Mar 2022 #9
uponit7771 Mar 2022 #25
AZProgressive Mar 2022 #26
Bettie Mar 2022 #32
Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2022 #55
Bettie Mar 2022 #69
Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2022 #73
Autumn Mar 2022 #85
JustAnotherGen Mar 2022 #64
Wingus Dingus Mar 2022 #11
mcar Mar 2022 #75
Polybius Mar 2022 #81
mcar Mar 2022 #83
Polybius Mar 2022 #89
mcar Mar 2022 #91
Wingus Dingus Mar 2022 #82
Ocelot II Mar 2022 #12
AZProgressive Mar 2022 #14
Ocelot II Mar 2022 #15
AZProgressive Mar 2022 #16
Ocelot II Mar 2022 #19
AZProgressive Mar 2022 #21
Budi Mar 2022 #52
AZProgressive Mar 2022 #57
Budi Mar 2022 #60
Retrograde Mar 2022 #41
relayerbob Mar 2022 #18
uponit7771 Mar 2022 #24
Peacetrain Mar 2022 #31
Budi Mar 2022 #34
Retrograde Mar 2022 #43
Budi Mar 2022 #51
brooklynite Mar 2022 #42
uponit7771 Mar 2022 #45
Budi Mar 2022 #46
LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2022 #71
mcar Mar 2022 #76
AZProgressive Mar 2022 #48
Budi Mar 2022 #53
AZProgressive Mar 2022 #59
Budi Mar 2022 #65
betsuni Mar 2022 #80
Budi Mar 2022 #87
brooklynite Mar 2022 #58
AZProgressive Mar 2022 #61
brooklynite Mar 2022 #67
AZProgressive Mar 2022 #70
Budi Mar 2022 #66
Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2022 #56
uponit7771 Mar 2022 #77
JohnSJ Mar 2022 #62
Budi Mar 2022 #68
JohnSJ Mar 2022 #74
uponit7771 Mar 2022 #78
Samrob Mar 2022 #30
LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2022 #33
FakeNoose Mar 2022 #47
LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2022 #72
Sur Zobra Mar 2022 #35
Budi Mar 2022 #36
Me. Mar 2022 #38
LiberalFighter Mar 2022 #39
katmondoo Mar 2022 #44
Algernon Moncrieff Mar 2022 #49
JI7 Mar 2022 #50
JoeOtterbein Mar 2022 #84
Polybius Mar 2022 #90

Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:04 AM

1. That, Right There, Is a Dead End

If they go down that road, they will have to turn around and come back the same way to get anywhere.

That, of course, is my opinion, as is everything I write here about the future.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MineralMan (Reply #1)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:16 AM

4. Agree.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MineralMan (Reply #1)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 08:36 PM

86. Like it or not, the writer of the Politico article...

...knows her stuff!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:12 AM

2. That's dumb of them to do

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:16 AM

3. That's idiotic.

Truly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:25 AM

5. What a stupid divisive thing to do at this time when we need unity more than ever. No surprise

though, seeing where it is coming from.

It was just a few weeks ago Ro Khanna was pushing concerns against "lethal aid" to Ukraine. Khanna is quiet about that now.

Ironic how some on the left also have the same view about NATO as trump.

Memories are short, and I suspect that will slip under the radar






Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnSJ (Reply #5)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:44 AM

13. It is only giving us information we need.

I am not offended by knowledge.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gibraltar72 (Reply #13)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 12:21 PM

22. Really? With everything that is going on now, three years before 2024, this is

"information we need"?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnSJ (Reply #22)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 12:52 PM

27. I can handle knowing this is happening.

I am actually thankful to know what goes on "behind the scenes". That's just me. I don't find it harmful.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gibraltar72 (Reply #27)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 12:54 PM

28. Of course, each us only speak for our personal views. That is why it is good to have this forum

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnSJ (Reply #28)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 12:57 PM

29. Kinda my point.

Take what information that is helpful from each OP. Or don't take any.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gibraltar72 (Reply #29)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 05:05 PM

79. Well said all around

Thank you

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnSJ (Reply #5)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 01:46 PM

37. K & R . There's an agenda...

 

S.i.l.i.c.o.n. V.a.l.l.e.y.
Millionares & Billionares
Protecting their own interests from regulations by our Dem leaders in DC.

There's a whole backstory that really should be posted but, ya know.

Thanks for your truth post 💙

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Budi (Reply #37)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 02:21 PM

40. His association and donations from Peter Thiel make him suspect in my book

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnSJ (Reply #40)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 03:52 PM

63. The Thiel connection is why I have

A hard time trusting what he says.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:38 AM

6. Well, that's one way to deflect attention from the right wingers' refusal to oppose Putin.

Give them Khanna to point their finger at. I am sure they will appreciate the effort, since they are having difficulty doing so themselves.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:39 AM

7. I thought people learned from their mistakes.

Bernie did this before. He said Obama should be primaried. That cost him the black vote, and hence his run for the presidency.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cartoonist (Reply #7)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:41 AM

10. This isn't about a primary challenge

They are considering this in the event Biden doesn’t run and we have a full primary. I think Biden will run again so I think the issue is moot.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AZProgressive (Reply #10)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:55 AM

17. He is doing harm.

Unless Biden screws up, he should have the full support of all Democrats. He hasn't screwed up, but by putting forward a replacement, even speculatively, undermines him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cartoonist (Reply #17)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:56 AM

20. This is from Weaver who was a Sanders aide

I don’t think Bernie Sanders is personally pushing this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AZProgressive (Reply #20)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 12:24 PM

23. and you don't think Weaver is not following Sanders' views?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cartoonist (Reply #7)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 03:40 PM

54. It clearly states IF BIDEN DOESN'T RUN.

Nobody, and I repeat loudly for those in the back of the room, NOBODY, is saying Biden should be primaried in this article.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cuthbert Allgood (Reply #54)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 09:17 PM

88. It is still underminig

It does not show support for Biden.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:39 AM

8. Really, why they want more losing?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:40 AM

9. This is only in the event Biden doesn't run again

Personally I prefer AOC but that is way down the road. I think Biden runs again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AZProgressive (Reply #9)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 12:26 PM

25. How dismissive is it to ignore the female PoC that's in the VP position?!?!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to uponit7771 (Reply #25)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 12:30 PM

26. I think Harris will likely win the next open primary

She would easily win South Carolina and a lot of the Southern States.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to uponit7771 (Reply #25)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 01:07 PM

32. I agree and why?

Why do they automatically dismiss her?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bettie (Reply #32)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 03:41 PM

55. Because they want someone further to the left?

Or isn't that allowed?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cuthbert Allgood (Reply #55)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 04:23 PM

69. It's allowed

though Elizabeth Warren was farther to the left than Harris. Strange though, people found that they didn't like her either.

The song is the same each time..."I'm open to a woman, but not THAT woman".

The secret is that any woman becomes "that woman" eventually.

We will likely never have a woman as president. Misogyny is too deeply rooted.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bettie (Reply #69)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 04:32 PM

73. I hope that we have a woman for president, but I fear you are right.

I would have loved to vote for Warren. I don't think she is up to running again, but I could be wrong.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cuthbert Allgood (Reply #55)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 08:26 PM

85. She did not do well in the primaries at all. Her campaign was riddled with problems.

The 2020 Democratic field has been defined by its turbulence, with some contenders rising, others dropping out and two more jumping in just this month. Yet there is only one candidate who rocketed to the top tier and then plummeted in early state polls to the low single digits: Ms. Harris.

From those polling results to Ms. Harris’s campaign operation, fund-raising and debate performances, it has been a remarkable comedown for a senator from the country’s largest state, a politician with star power who was compared to President Obama even before Californians elected her to the Senate in 2016.

Yet, even to some Harris allies, her decline is more predictable than surprising. In one instance after another, Ms. Harris and her closest advisers made flawed decisions about which states to focus on, issues to emphasize and opponents to target, all the while refusing to make difficult personnel choices to impose order on an unwieldy campaign, according to more than 50 current and former campaign staff members and allies, most of whom spoke on condition of anonymity to disclose private conversations and assessments involving the candidate.

Representative Marcia Fudge, who has endorsed Ms. Harris and is a former chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus, said in an interview that the senator was an exceptional candidate who had been poorly served by some top staff and who must fire Mr. Rodriguez. But she also acknowledged that Ms. Harris bore a measure of responsibility for her problems — “it’s her campaign” — and that the structure she created has not served her well.


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/29/us/politics/kamala-harris-2020.html

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to uponit7771 (Reply #25)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 03:53 PM

64. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:43 AM

11. I'd like to see some governors run.

Jared Polis, Andy Beshear, Gretchen Whitmer.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Wingus Dingus (Reply #11)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 04:41 PM

75. If Biden doesn't run, our excellent VP is the front-runner

This dismissing of an experienced, highly qualified WoC is disturbing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mcar (Reply #75)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 06:29 PM

81. She did terrible in the 2020 primaries

She won't be the front runner in either 2024 or 2028.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Polybius (Reply #81)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 07:11 PM

83. She's the Vice President of the United States

of course she will be the front-runner in 2024.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mcar (Reply #83)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:12 PM

89. I think Biden will be the front-runner in 2024

2028 will be the real mystery.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Polybius (Reply #89)

Sat Mar 19, 2022, 05:05 PM

91. If Biden doesn't run, of course.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mcar (Reply #75)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 07:08 PM

82. I didn't dismiss her. But just as Biden had to earn his

nomination against other primary opponents (including Harris), she will too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:44 AM

12. Who?

Great idea - push somebody that only people who watch MSNBC late at night have heard of. I had to rack my brain for a bit to even remember who that is. I swear, there's a faction of the party that must be comprised of political masochists who set themselves up to lose because that warm fuzzy sense of being aggrieved feels so good.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ocelot II (Reply #12)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:51 AM

14. Bernie Sanders was unknown before he ran

The more people got to know him the more votes he got.

As someone who voted for Sanders twice I wouldn’t vote for Ro Khanna. I’m sure there would be a different progressive in the primary that I would rather vote for.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AZProgressive (Reply #14)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:53 AM

15. And Bernie lost twice, thank God or whoever's in charge.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ocelot II (Reply #15)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:54 AM

16. He did well considering the name recognition Biden and Hillary Clinton have

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AZProgressive (Reply #16)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:56 AM

19. My point is simply that another obscure progressive who manages to become less obscure

is just as unlikely to win a presidential primary, let alone a general election, as Bernie was.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ocelot II (Reply #19)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 12:15 PM

21. I always felt it was more difficult to win the Democratic Primary

Than the general election. There is a rule against fighting the last primary and it is too soon for me to debate the next primary.

Ro Khanna is definitely not my first choice though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AZProgressive (Reply #14)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 03:34 PM

52. I'd like to see the redacted part of Mueller's report that named Sanders & Trump as beneficiaries.

 

We deserve to know what followed that one line.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Budi (Reply #52)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 03:43 PM

57. Do you mean social media campaigns?

Usually sources & methods are redacted. I still see Russian active measures on Twitter but they are not supportive of Bernie Sanders. I think they were more interested in causing chaos & divisions while pushing pro Russia talking points.

Sanders warns Russia to stay out of US presidential campaign

(Snip)

Sanders said he was briefed about a month ago. His campaign noted the briefing was classified.

“We were told that Russia, maybe other countries, are going to get involved in this campaign,” Sanders told reporters. “Look, here is the message: To Russia, stay out of American elections.”

What they are doing, by the way, the ugly thing that they are doing – and I’ve seen some of their tweets and stuff – is they try to divide us up,” he said. “They are trying to cause chaos. They’re trying to cause hatred in America.”
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/2/22/sanders-warns-russia-to-stay-out-of-us-presidential-campaign

He is 100% correct. The Russian trolls are very toxic.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AZProgressive (Reply #57)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 03:47 PM

60. Well, he would know. In his security level govt position, I mean.

 

I'd happily cherry pick some statements too...but ya know how that goes!..

Later.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ocelot II (Reply #12)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 02:22 PM

41. Representative from the district that abuts mine

I don't know of anyone in his district complaining about him, but then they don't talk about him at all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:56 AM

18. Typical

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 12:25 PM

24. So fuckin sexist and racist at the same time to dismiss the person who is in the VP position. It's

... a typical trope to act as if the person of color or woman doesn't want a position.

I wish the reports of this and the actions like this would stop, it's a no go from get

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to uponit7771 (Reply #24)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 01:05 PM

31. THIS! THIS! THIS

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to uponit7771 (Reply #24)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 01:33 PM

34. So looks like we're ok with Big Corporate Millionares & Billionares now?

 

Silicon Valley has no love for the Dems in DC who they've been fighting against, with all the power that Big Corporate Money has, as the Dems have tried to implement regulations on that self-protected class of tech billionares.

Silicon Valley sees Ro Khanna as their man in DC. Silicon Valley needs to be busted up, & start with Trumper, Libertarian, Peter Thiel.

Yes, it was Silicon Valley that gave Khanna his start. And fully backed Donald Trump from 2016 thru today.
The backstory on his rise is chilling.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Budi (Reply #34)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 02:30 PM

43. Is this the same Silicon Valley

uthat cast more votes against Trump in 2020 then there are people in Wyoming? And has consistently sent a slate of Democratic reps to Congress?

Your vision of Silicon Valley seems to consist solely of the heads of the large corporations. There are about 2 million people living here who staff those corporations, provide the service jobs, and support the infrastructure. And these are overwhelmingly Democratic voters. And for all their billions, Thiel, Zuckerberg, and their ilk only don't get any more votes per capita as the people who deliver their Uber Eats orders.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Retrograde (Reply #43)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 03:29 PM

51. You missed the point. Its the power of their billions & influence in buying the Presidency to suit..

 

...to suit their agenda.
Its the power of purchase & influence.
Has nothing to do with the votes from SV itself.
Their money & influence is a far greater reach than the votes in that one area they call home.

Millionares & Billionares of Silicon Valley.
Peter Thiel is a libertarian like the Kochs. He & his fellow SV influencers stood firm behind Trump for a reason.




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to uponit7771 (Reply #24)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 02:23 PM

42. Not sexist or racist; ideological

Consider the current NYS Governor Primary. Jumaane Williams is running against the incumbent female Governor (who has abley filled the role after the chaos of Andrew Cuomo). Its not a sexism thing; its this OUR REVOLUTION/JUSTICE DEMOCRATS mantra that we need to replace perfectly responsible mainstream Democrats with "real" progressives.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #42)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 02:33 PM

45. Gas lighting is rude, this is text book dismissal of Harris as POTUS

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #42)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 02:52 PM

46. How's his record on foreign policy? Cuz we have a VP ready to step in where Biden leaves off.

 

Should Biden run or not in 24, VP is well prepared to carry his torch.

SHE is our President to follow Joe Biden, & carry on when & where he leaves off.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Budi (Reply #46)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 04:29 PM

71. If President Joe Biden does not run, I will be supporting MVP Harris

I think that Joe will be running in 2024.

I am not fans of Justice Democrats and I doubt that I would support any Justice Democrat in the primaries

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Budi (Reply #46)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 04:43 PM

76. If Biden doesn't run, VP Harris has my support

No need for a costly and divisive primary; there is too much at stake.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #42)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 03:07 PM

48. This is in the event Biden doesn't run

There is no one to replace in an open primary. I don’t support Ro Khanna but I would have expected you to read your own OP unlike the vast majority of posters in this thread.

Progressives have a right to run and a primary shouldn’t be given to Harris simply because she is VP.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AZProgressive (Reply #48)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 03:37 PM

53. Wow. So now "Millionares & Big Corporate Billionares" are cool again?

 

Better update those old campaign slogans before 2024!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Budi (Reply #53)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 03:47 PM

59. LOL not backing Ro Khanna

It is somewhat personal for me. After I tweeted at Delaney who wanted to debate AOC Ro Khanna followed me and invited me to private Twitter group called All of US 2020 which was used to promote Tweets. Apparently he followed a lot of Bernie supporters and invited them to this group. Shortly after the primary ended he unfollowed a lot of us so I unfollowed him back. At least Klobuchar still follows me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AZProgressive (Reply #59)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 04:12 PM

65. Wow. So much for fair weather friends, huh.

 

Honestly, the data on his financials, his alignment with those who are anything but progressive for average people, maybe progressive for his SV techs, but not the average American, is so out of sync with the words he claims, & his regular appearances on Fox are just too much to buy, especially after all we know about media manipulation.
We have got to do the research ourselves.

I'd like to post the reserched material on him, but its unfortunately, not allowed. Ya know.
We just gotta look for it ourselves anymore.

ick.





Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Budi (Reply #53)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 06:27 PM

80. Same way "Millionaires and billionaires" suddenly became just "billionaires," wonder if

that one will disappear too. "Oligarchs" sounds nice and diabolical for 2024 slogan.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betsuni (Reply #80)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 08:50 PM

87. Be a millionare, write a book!

 

Yeehaw..
Everybody gets a book deal 🤪

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AZProgressive (Reply #48)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 03:47 PM

58. I was responding to the prior claim in the thread (#24)...

So fuckin sexist and racist at the same time to dismiss the person who is in the VP position.


I have no philosophical objection to anyone running for President or any other office. I DO have a political objection to promoting candidates with an ideological bent that's not likely going to appeal to the broad electorate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #58)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 03:50 PM

61. It depends

When it comes to young voters and what I mean by that is 40 or younger find the progressives to be more mainstream. Someone like Biden is probably mainstream for the older voters on this board but not so much for the younger people such as his marijuana stance which is unpopular and out of the mainstream.

Your objection would make sense if the Democrats were undefeated before the young progressives showed up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AZProgressive (Reply #61)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 04:18 PM

67. The "young progressives" have not, from what I see, added to Democratic officeholders...

...they seem to spend their time targeting other Democrats in safe seats.

Add to which, they still have a strikingly poor record of actually showing up to vote.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #67)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 04:28 PM

70. The nearest Progressive is Raul Grijalva with the most missed votes in 2020

It is too soon in the year for 2021 stats.

Barbara Lee who is the most progressive in Congress is up there with fewest votes missed. She isn’t young but Tlaib doesn’t miss a lot of votes.

Cortez doesn’t miss a lot of votes either.

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/report-cards/2020/party-house-democrat/missed-votes

Gabbard is up there with the missed most votes but she is mostly right wing.

Sanders did miss a lot of votes in 2020 but I’m sure the numbers are similar for other Presidential candidates

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #58)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 04:15 PM

66. Appealing to the broad electorate will demand truth in messaging, media & so far that's a bust.

 

I'm looking for substance over slogan.
Ya know?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to uponit7771 (Reply #24)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 03:43 PM

56. Nobody says she doesn't. And Khanna is Indian, so no clue how it's racist.

The people that are to the left of Harris want someone running for President that is left of Harris. It's pretty simple.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cuthbert Allgood (Reply #56)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 04:51 PM

77. Khanna isn't doing the dismissing in this context anyone proffering he run against Harris is !!!!!!

WYF !!?!

It's misinformed that the people who are left of Harris are that much more left than she is

Shit I would think that's some GOP propaganda bullshit being profit here on DU

Looking at her record and looking at what she ran on she's pretty much damn left.

This is usual racist bullshit and misogynist bullshit passing by people who are already in that position are qualified and going mostly to a man or somebody else that they think should be there

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to uponit7771 (Reply #24)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 03:51 PM

62. As far as I am concerned if Joe decided not to run, I will be supporting Harris, who is being

groomed for the job.

That being said, I truly believe Joe will run and win in 2024

We are very fortunate to have him at this time

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnSJ (Reply #62)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 04:18 PM

68. True. Considering the current state of the world powers, I would demad the candidate reveal...

 

..reveal some substancial foreign policy experience. Especially when strengthening our unity of NATO.

Better come with more than crafted slogans & trending quotes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Budi (Reply #68)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 04:40 PM

74. +++

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnSJ (Reply #62)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 04:53 PM

78. +1, so will the majority of the Democratic party. I'm thinking this bullshit is trial balloons

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 01:02 PM

30. Joe has done everything he could to help this country save itself. He is tired but an eager Patriot

I hope is does retire. And I hope KH gets appointed to the SCOTUS or HRC. That would complete his tenure if possible. I would like to see Schiff make a run for it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 01:27 PM

33. Does this mean that the Justice Democrats are not planning on running Sanders in 2024?

I will be supporting Joe in 2024

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LetMyPeopleVote (Reply #33)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 03:02 PM

47. +1000



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FakeNoose (Reply #47)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 04:30 PM

72. I seriously doubt that Sanders will be running in 2024

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 01:36 PM

35. I've only heard him on Thom Hartmann's

 

radio show. He is the master of the non answer.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sur Zobra (Reply #35)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 01:41 PM

36. He's a regular on Fox as well. But who watches Fox. Oh wait...

 

Perhaps Politico can run a story on the background of Mr Khanna, Peter Thiel & Silicon Valley.

I can point them to one already compiled, but even Politico couldn't whitewash it enough to print to their standards.
I look forward for the backstory to be revealed by actual research journos.

It's pretty awful.
🤭

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Budi (Reply #36)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 02:05 PM

38. You Beat Me To It

Well not worried...this is another AS If situation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 02:14 PM

39. Who the hell is he? And Sanders needs to button his lips.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LiberalFighter (Reply #39)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 02:31 PM

44. I don't support Sanders or his pick for President. He has disappointed me in the past.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 03:14 PM

49. " ..if Joe Biden doesn't seek a second term"

I have no problem with encouraging anyone to look at running on a contingency basis.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 03:17 PM

50. Ugh

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 08:22 PM

84. K n R!!!

Thanks for posting! We need news about progressives. They are our base. And will be in November and 2024. Despite what some people feel about them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 11:17 PM

90. The better question is, who will both Party's run in 2028

Win or lose in 2024, it won't be Trump or Biden in 2028.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread