General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMcConnell to vote 'no' on Ketanji Brown Jackson
The big picture: Jackson is likely to be confirmed with or without McConnells support, but he had left the door open in previous days, saying he wasn't yet sure.
What he's saying now: In a speech on the Senate floor on Thursday, McConnell said Jackson deflected questions on constitutional philosophy and cited the fact that she's backed by groups that support court-packing.
"I cannot and will not support Judge Jackson to her lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court," McConnell said.
https://www.axios.com/mcconnell-ketanji-brown-jackson-confirmation-127977a3-a4ed-44a6-9485-80169ead4c45.html
CurtEastPoint
(20,040 posts)Trueblue1968
(19,265 posts)I hate him.
Please let the Vampires and WereWolves tear him limb from limb ~~~~~
Hey everyone, i have been reading too many paranormal novels lately. forget that sentence above, i was in a crazy mood.
Raven
(14,275 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)BeyondGeography
(41,142 posts)Thomas Hurt
(13,986 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,906 posts)I just hope Manchin and Sinema are on board.
Carlitos Brigante
(26,848 posts)one who gets to pack the courts........"
Crunchy Frog
(28,283 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)The real worry is SineManchin.
2naSalit
(103,090 posts)The day after that fucker stops wasting good air.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)I'm just surprised the word "uppity" didn't make it into Moscow Mitch's statement.
spanone
(141,724 posts)Fuck him
Kali
(56,847 posts)mcconnell voting no on a Dem nominee? I don't believe it.
Caliman73
(11,767 posts)Asshole, she did not deflect. She answered those questions. Perhaps you didn't like the answers. She is not bound to labels. She is not an originalist, or a textualist, or a "living document" adherent. Judge Brown Jackson approaches her legal cases by looking at the Constitution, looking at the text, meaning, and consequences of law and judicial interpretation. She examines how ruling would impact the law, with the focus on the Judiciary not being "policy makers" but interpreting whether those laws or disputes on the law adhere to the Constitution. That is not a deflection, that is a judge that is not bound to one way of looking at things. Someone that you can't really pin down and that scares you. Plus, she's nominated by a Democrat, Black. and a Woman, so we know you weren't going vote for her anyway. Too bad for you that you will have to call her Justice Brown Jackson for the rest of your pathetic life.
Also, you supported a justice with hardly any experience who couldn't even answer what rights are protected by the First Amendment.
MagickMuffin
(18,327 posts)White Supremacist Mitch McConnell of course will vote no. No surprise there! Yet I would've been extremely surprised if he voted yes 😂
maxsolomon
(38,840 posts)Maybe Murkowski.
That's about it for the GQP side of the aisle.
Baitball Blogger
(52,451 posts)You know, my guess is that Clarence Thomas isn't doing well, and they are being proactive about stopping a qualified candidate from going through. Slowing down the process.
Deuce
(960 posts)patphil
(9,099 posts)Judge Jackson is a stellar candidate, but, she's a Democrat, and a black woman.
McConnell would never support her.
AntiFascist
(13,753 posts)IzzaNuDay
(1,303 posts)McC's admission is to lead the rest of the GOP to also vote no. They will all be on the wrong side of history.
DFW
(60,264 posts)He was never "not sure." Qualifications mean nothing to him.or he would never have voted to confirm the beer-addled frat boy or Ms. Phony Carrot. He votes ideology, always has, always will. He is just too much of a coward and a liar to say so publicly.
beaglelover
(4,473 posts)Bettie
(19,755 posts)Honestly. It would be a shock if he were to vote yes on any nominee from a Democratic president.
keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)Certainly cannot let Biden get his choices on the SC during the final 3 years of his first term.
jmowreader
(53,236 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(136,049 posts)ificandream
(11,840 posts)Gidney N Cloyd
(19,847 posts)I still think Jackson will pick up a lot of repub 'Ayes.'