Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUS: unqualified. (Original Post) 634-5789 Mar 2022 OP
Clarence Thomas was not qualified either. DURHAM D Mar 2022 #1
I would love to see a comparison of the Justices RamblingRose Mar 2022 #4
Excellent idea. Not sure all of the categories to use erronis Mar 2022 #6
Hillary had a tweet with exactly that information a few days ago. It was posted niyad Mar 2022 #21
Not as a graphic, but me from 2014: JHB Mar 2022 #12
All true, except he's now been on the court for 30 years. ShazzieB Mar 2022 #15
They needed to make up for the mistake of David Souter IronLionZion Mar 2022 #16
At the time, I'm not sure they'd concluded Souter was a mistake. JHB Mar 2022 #26
Clarence Thomas... appmanga Mar 2022 #28
Yeah but the BABIES! Thunderbeast Mar 2022 #2
Speaking of which, wind her up. . . DinahMoeHum Mar 2022 #7
Birth control is a sin. SergeStorms Mar 2022 #17
But I am willing to betray all American women. milestogo Mar 2022 #3
That's half the fun when you're a Republican peppertree Mar 2022 #23
K&r Demovictory9 Mar 2022 #5
Saw this earlier. On DU? usonian Mar 2022 #8
+1 H2O Man Mar 2022 #13
yeah, i don't think she should be knocked for going to Notre Dame. Calista241 Mar 2022 #32
IANAL, so I can't comment on the quality of any law school. usonian Mar 2022 #33
Anyone know what her stand is on parking garages? Hugin Mar 2022 #9
uNQUALIFIED marieo1 Mar 2022 #10
By that measure, some pretty great Justices were unqualified. onenote Mar 2022 #11
she is a repuke hack Skittles Mar 2022 #14
Much like Trump, she was chosen by Jesus. walkingman Mar 2022 #18
The Federalist Society really. n/t PoliticAverse Mar 2022 #25
The American Bar Association rated her "Well Qualified". PoliticAverse Mar 2022 #19
The meme is stupid onenote Mar 2022 #24
And there's the fact that she endorsed an anti-abortion terrorist group TexasBushwhacker Mar 2022 #20
And as bad as the Handmaid is - she's far from the worst in today's Extreme Court peppertree Mar 2022 #22
Her qualification, I am afraid to say, is in the eyes of the beholder, she is perfect for repubs. Escurumbele Mar 2022 #27
You could add "unscrupulous" to the description. BobTheSubgenius Mar 2022 #29
Supremacy Goonch Mar 2022 #30
Pack the effing courts already! BlueWavePsych Mar 2022 #31

erronis

(15,170 posts)
6. Excellent idea. Not sure all of the categories to use
Sun Mar 27, 2022, 04:24 PM
Mar 2022

and there would be some subjectivity.

Obviously the FedSoc would have different grades than the ACLU or ABA.

JHB

(37,153 posts)
12. Not as a graphic, but me from 2014:
Sun Mar 27, 2022, 04:49 PM
Mar 2022
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10024571481#post47

The reason Thomas was put on the SC was...
...NOT because he was the most qualified jurist. He wasn't.
...NOT because he was the most qualified black jurist. He wasn't.
...NOT because he was the most qualified black conservative jurist. He wasn't.

He was the most qualified black conservative with reliable but obfuscatable views on abortion & other subjects, and was young enough that he'd stay on the court for decades.

The Democratic senators were initially ready to give him a pass, since 1) they didn't look forward to another SC nomination battle, and 2) initially the black community was receptive to Thomas -- not enthusiastic, but not inclined to oppose -- and a fight against him wouldn't be well received.

At the time I thought Thomas should have been voted down just because of his lackluster record and ignoring conflict of interest (Thomas failed to recuse himself in a case involving the Ralston Purina company, where his political mentor Sen. John Danforth owned millions in stock and had brothers on the board of directors. Thomas' decision in favor of Purina directly benefited his pals).

Black opinion didn't shift until later in the process, after Thurgood Marshall made his "a black snake is still a snake" comment. The senators were finally forced to take a harder line when the harassment charges leaked out, and giving Thomas a pass would piss off another Democratic constituency: women fighting workplace harassment.

But all that happened too late: by that point conservatives were ginned up in support and the rest of the establishment didn't want another high-profile fight, so the Thomas hearings were kept to a he-said-she-said with Anita Hill (Angela Wright was shunted off to the side), giving the senators their excuse to just put it behind them.

So here we are, a quarter-century later, and he's still a lackluster jurist who ignores conflicts of interest, and is a reliable conservative operative in the courts.


ShazzieB

(16,265 posts)
15. All true, except he's now been on the court for 30 years.
Sun Mar 27, 2022, 05:03 PM
Mar 2022

Last edited Sun Mar 27, 2022, 06:52 PM - Edit history (1)

Three decades, and counting. *weary sigh*

Poppy Bush knew exactly what he was doing when he picked a 43 year old for that SCOTUS seat.

IronLionZion

(45,380 posts)
16. They needed to make up for the mistake of David Souter
Sun Mar 27, 2022, 05:15 PM
Mar 2022

Poppy's first appointee turned out to be liberal

JHB

(37,153 posts)
26. At the time, I'm not sure they'd concluded Souter was a mistake.
Sun Mar 27, 2022, 07:50 PM
Mar 2022

I haven't researched that part, but my general recollection was that it was a few years later that they'd figured out that Souter wasn't the ideological operative they'd thought he was when they'd nominated him.


For the Thomas hearings, it was more a case of picking a black conservative to replace Thurgood Marshal. However, most black conservative jurists at the time were prone to having "conservatively incorrect" views in civil rights matters. But Senator Danforth said "i know a guy", and the rest is sorry history.

appmanga

(566 posts)
28. Clarence Thomas...
Mon Mar 28, 2022, 11:31 AM
Mar 2022

...makes her look like Chief Justice Taft. Just part of his biography from Oyez.org:

"Thomas transferred to College of the Holy Cross and graduated in 1971 with a bachelor’s degree in English Literature and a passion for civil rights that drove him to pursue a career in law. He attended Yale Law School as one of the first students to benefit from the open admissions program that offered positions to black students in all-white colleges. Years later, Thomas would grow to abhor affirmative action, as hiring partners and other white colleagues would credit his accomplishments not to hard work and dedication, but to the color of his skin and the measures schools took to recruit black students. Upon graduation, Thomas began working in the office of the Missouri Attorney General after being admitted to the Missouri bar in 1974. In 1977, he worked for Senator John C. Danforth as his legislative assistant. After four years working with Danforth, President Reagan appointed Thomas as the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights in the U.S. Department of Education. A year later, Reagan propelled his career even further by appointing him Chairman of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. By this point in Thomas’ life, he was still living with severe debt from student loans, an issue made worse by his addiction to alcohol. Once Thomas decided he could no longer afford to drink as he did, he quit drinking all together. Thomas served at the EEOC for eight years, and in 1990, President George H. W. Bush nominated Thomas to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia circuit.

As a 43-year-old with barely one year of experience on the judiciary under his belt, Clarence Thomas was quite young and inexperienced when George H. W. Bush nominated him to the Supreme Court in 1991"
.

https://www.oyez.org/justices/clarence_thomas

Edited even further to add: I've always thought of Thomas as one of America's greatest cowards, and 30 plus years on the Supreme Court has validated that. I can't think of one decision where he's ever ruled in favor of the less powerful over the more so, and his rulings in Fourth Amendment and prisoners' rights cases are the stuff of "Twilight Zone" episodes. Turds like him and Tim Scott think they're brave because they go against "the liberal plantation orthodoxy" when they've traded in their ability to make a difference for the comforting cloak of personal gain and the "let 'em eat cake" conservative mindset. I don't now if I have as much disdain for any other people on Earth (including a fat-assed orange idiot grifter) as I have for them.

SergeStorms

(19,156 posts)
17. Birth control is a sin.
Sun Mar 27, 2022, 05:15 PM
Mar 2022
We already know how ACB will decide on Griswold, and I believe the far right has it's heart set on overturning that as well.

peppertree

(21,595 posts)
23. That's half the fun when you're a Republican
Sun Mar 27, 2022, 06:45 PM
Mar 2022

The same way Thomass betrays minorities, and Alito betrays working class people.

Calista241

(5,585 posts)
32. yeah, i don't think she should be knocked for going to Notre Dame.
Mon Mar 28, 2022, 12:03 PM
Mar 2022

Instead of an 'Ivy League' school. Notre Dame is one of the best law schools in the country. And most of the 'Ivy League' is living on a reputation, especially the schools not named Harvard, Yale or Columbia.

While I wish it wasn't Barrett, and that she wasn't on the court, I think it's good to have judges from different educational backgrounds. All of them being from Yale, Harvard or Columbia isn't the best IMO.

usonian

(9,680 posts)
33. IANAL, so I can't comment on the quality of any law school.
Mon Mar 28, 2022, 01:03 PM
Mar 2022

Especially when most senators and congresspeople are law school graduates, and half of them are acting in pure cult mode!

Objectivity compels me to believe that your education, religion or "pedigree" is evidenced by your behavior, rather than anything else.

And that's an individual choice, "papers" aside.





onenote

(42,535 posts)
11. By that measure, some pretty great Justices were unqualified.
Sun Mar 27, 2022, 04:47 PM
Mar 2022

William O Douglas. Felix Frankfurter. Louis Brandeis. Harlan Finke Stone.

Also, more recently, Lewis Powell and Elena Kagan.

It's a stupid meme.

onenote

(42,535 posts)
24. The meme is stupid
Sun Mar 27, 2022, 06:54 PM
Mar 2022

BY the measures in the meme, Elena Kagan is unqualified. And William O. Douglas, Felix Frankfurter, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Louis Brandeis.

There are folks here who think Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are qualified to be SCOTUS Justices, but by the measures applied in the meme, that wouldn't be the case.

That meme is almost as stupid as Carlson asking about Jackson's LSAT scores.

peppertree

(21,595 posts)
22. And as bad as the Handmaid is - she's far from the worst in today's Extreme Court
Sun Mar 27, 2022, 06:43 PM
Mar 2022

That would be Mr. Pubic Hair (or Scalito).

Escurumbele

(3,374 posts)
27. Her qualification, I am afraid to say, is in the eyes of the beholder, she is perfect for repubs.
Mon Mar 28, 2022, 11:30 AM
Mar 2022

For anyone else? NO!, but for republicans she is the ideal woman, one who obeys and doesn't question. I bet anyone that in her case the one who makes the decisions, who decides how she votes is her husband.

BobTheSubgenius

(11,558 posts)
29. You could add "unscrupulous" to the description.
Mon Mar 28, 2022, 11:37 AM
Mar 2022

Who would even accept a nomination when they HAVE to know that they are barely more qualified than a student at Harvard Law? And that student may have far greater potential, to boot.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SCOTUS: unqualified.