General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumspatphil
(6,158 posts)Take out the locomotives, bridges, and tunnels. You can even go outside Ukraine and attack the rail lines in Russia.
Russia already has a resupply problem. Making it harder to resupply will blunt their war effort.
The same can be done with road bridges.
brush
(53,758 posts)as if the Russian army is running trains in Ukraine. The Ukrainian's who've knocked out convoys and hundreds of tanks and armored vehicles would never have allowed Russian trains to roll in their country.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)patphil
(6,158 posts)I don't think they'll make much of a distinction between in Ukraine or in Russia.
But they might not want to destroy the infrastructure within Ukraine.
Locomotives do make easy target though...like tanks that can't move sideways or shoot back.
brush
(53,758 posts)except maybe the east that Russia has just about annexed. It's not a matter of destroying infrastructure because Russian trains aren't rolling in the Ukrainian controlled areas.
I mean what railroad engineer would roll a sitting duck target like a train in Ukraine after what Ukrainians have done to Russian tanks, vehicles that aren't on tracks and maneuver and shoot back. That wouldn't be smart at all.
I don't think even the Russian generals would order that.
patphil
(6,158 posts)brush
(53,758 posts)Igel
(35,293 posts)I assume the Ukrainians know this. Whether or not the Ukr forces have the appropriate weapons--different story.
msongs
(67,381 posts)EX500rider
(10,829 posts)https://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htlog/articles/20220328.aspx
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)And if Ukraine destroys rail lines inside Russia, it's a win-win!
uponit7771
(90,323 posts)... doctrine depended on rail lines for logistics and support but they're INSIDE Russia not outside.
Russian rail is like US highway which is fairly overdeveloped relative to other countries.
The further supplies get away from the railways the worse off RA logistics work for large scale engagements.
Fighting terrorist on the back of pick up trucks?
Easy peasy, fighting the US with road based logistics? not so much
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,365 posts)1,894,327 views Jul 16, 2013
Movieclips
56.5M subscribers
The Train movie clips: http://j.mp/1BcPcR0
BUY THE MOVIE: http://j.mp/1bq3eT6
Don't miss the HOTTEST NEW TRAILERS: http://bit.ly/1u2y6pr
CLIP DESCRIPTION:
Labiche (Burt Lancaster) tries to warn Papa Boule (Michel Simon) about the imminent bombing of the rail yard by Allied forces.
FILM DESCRIPTION:
John Frankenheimer directs Burt Lancaster in the tense spy thriller The Train. Lancaster plays Labiche, a French railway inspector. Allied forces are threatening to liberate Paris, so Col. Franz von Waldheim (Paul Scofield) is ordered to move the priceless works of art from the Jeu de Paume Museum to the fatherland. The head of the museum (Suzanne Flon) attempts to convince Labiche that he should sabotage the train on which they are transporting the art. Labiche is more focused on destroying a trainload of German weapons. After his friend is killed trying to stop the train with the art, and after a consciousness-raising conversation with a hotel owner (Jeanne Moreau), Labiche resolves to save the antiquities. Lancaster and Frankenheimer had worked together previously on both Birdman of Alcatraz and Seven Days in May.
CREDITS:
TM & © MGM (1964)
Cast: Burt Lancaster, Michel Simon, Howard Vernon
Directors: John Frankenheimer, Arthur Penn
Producers: Jules Bricken, Bernard Farrel
Screenwriters: Franklin Coen, Howard Dimsdale, Nedrick Young, Frank Davis, Rose Valland, Walter Bernstein, Albert Husson
WHO ARE WE?
The MOVIECLIPS channel is the largest collection of licensed movie clips on the web. Here you will find unforgettable moments, scenes and lines from all your favorite films. Made by movie fans, for movie fans.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR MOVIE CHANNELS:
MOVIECLIPS: http://bit.ly/1u2yaWd
ComingSoon: http://bit.ly/1DVpgtR
Indie & Film Festivals: http://bit.ly/1wbkfYg
Hero Central: http://bit.ly/1AMUZwv
Extras: http://bit.ly/1u431fr
Classic Trailers: http://bit.ly/1u43jDe
Pop-Up Trailers: http://bit.ly/1z7EtZR
Movie News: http://bit.ly/1C3Ncd2
Movie Games: http://bit.ly/1ygDV13
Fandango: http://bit.ly/1Bl79ye
Fandango FrontRunners: http://bit.ly/1CggQfC
HIT US UP:
Facebook: http://on.fb.me/1y8M8ax
Twitter: http://bit.ly/1ghOWmt
Pinterest: http://bit.ly/14wL9De
Tumblr: http://bit.ly/1vUwhH7
tinymontgomery
(2,584 posts)Martin68
(22,776 posts)That was one reason they ran out of gas and food when they tried to take Kyiv by roads. When their attempt to hold the airport there failed, they were up shit creek without a paddle.
Chuuku Davis
(565 posts)of the 600s
I don't understand, can someone explain that number?
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)Chuuku Davis
(565 posts)They can each launch 10 missiles for a total of 100 missiles.
That is not much.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)TomSlick
(11,096 posts)Russian logistics have been dreadful from the beginning. Anything that can be done to further diminish the logistical system would be great.
BobTheSubgenius
(11,562 posts)... comparatively cheap .50 rifle (compared to a whole weapons system), like a Barrett, for example, firing an also comparatively cheap ($100 to the general public) armour piercing round into the engine block of a transport truck will turn the truck into more of a roadblock, or a speed bump for tanks.
I don't know why I've no heard a whisper about these being used on the battlefield. A Cdn. sniper made a kill shot with a Barrett at 3480 meters a few years ago.
Chuuku Davis
(565 posts)And AP rounds are about $5.
But the Canadian was using a 50 BMG or a .338 Lapua depending on source and not a Barrett but a McMillan rifle.
He is actually in Ukraine right now by some reports.
EX500rider
(10,829 posts)https://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htweap/20210328.aspx
BobTheSubgenius
(11,562 posts)I had checked the overall accuracy of the report, and while the distance was incredible, it was accurate. The make of the rifle was not mentioned in the article, so I made an assumption. I know, I know.
In the same Wiki, I also found read about the price of the rounds, and I have no way of reconciling the discrepancies. I had to see this for myself, in as much as possible, so I watched a couple of YT videos. In one, the shooter drilled holes through a piece of railroad track, which was pretty impressive.
There were plenty of citations of various rounds costing $70 and up, but there are also cites I'd never seen before that confirmed the $5 amount. The costs cited are so far apart, and it makes me wonder why anyone would claim they'd spent that kind of money to buy a few rounds.
Chuuku Davis
(565 posts)50 BMG Raufoss costs about $80-$120 on the civ market. I have some as collector items.
.gov pays $11 I have heard.
I am one of those loons with some .50 BMG rifles but I mainly reload mine.
BobTheSubgenius
(11,562 posts)Thanks for the info! I'll reserve my opinion on the "loon" part until I hear of you shooting up a mall, or perhaps something armoured, if that's your preference.