General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMusk's huge problem re the Twitter hostile takeover attempt
The hard right is salivating over the prospect of Elon Musk buying Twitter and allowing all the RWNJs who were kicked off for violating the Twitter TOS to rejoin the service.
If I remember correctly, Mr. Musk makes cars that are pretty popular among liberals.
So
what happens to Mr. Musks empire if he lets Trump, MTG and Juanita Broaddrick back on Twitter, and all the liberals who were buying Teslas decide theyd rather buy other brands of electric car?
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)OhZone
(3,212 posts)I know my gf was considering getting a Tesla but has changed her mind now.
ForgedCrank
(1,782 posts)right-winger really. He's more of a hard-core libertarian type in the end. Which I find odd considering he built empires using government subsidies and grants for his nutty tunnel highways and other stupidity. Tesla (which isn't his company really) was popular and got a foothold due to taxpayer subsidies and credits if you bought one.
What pushed him over the edge recently were the CA covid lockdowns, it was crushing business in the state and it bankrupted a lot of people (and wasn't exclusive to CA, it's just where he was at the time).
Musk is about profit, he's not going to do anything stupid with Twitter, he's just trying to make noise for the most part. Is it a bluff? Who knows with that guy, he's somewhat unpredictable with things like this.
obamanut2012
(26,142 posts)ForgedCrank
(1,782 posts)brush
(53,871 posts)is that the libertarian likes to get high.
There's not much difference. He's a trumper.
OhZone
(3,212 posts)ForgedCrank
(1,782 posts)that as a left-leaning libertarian who has always voted Democrat, my vote may not be any longer welcome.
Is that what you are saying?
qazplm135
(7,447 posts)Why anyone would let what someone says randomly on a message board influence how they vote.
You're not going to vote Dem because some anonymous person doesn't like libertarianism?
I mean I personally think it's a juvenile political philosophy, but my opinion shouldn't matter to you either.
OhZone
(3,212 posts)haele
(12,679 posts)A lot of small l libertarians are basically free market Democrats, somewhat socially liberal, but not seeing a need for government regulations because they're not in a market, location, or career where they obviously need government regulations.
A lot of Union workers and residents of small, relatively well off homogeneous towns are small "l" liberatarians.
However...
Libertarianism is a Neo-Liberal philosophy coined by Any Rand and her followers, and is a totally different, anti-democratic philosophy that basically considers the only legitimate Government function is to act as a police function to ensure social hierarchy and an unregulated Free Market monopoly system. It's also called "Objectivism" -a way of looking at individual results without considering any contributing factors, such as social or financial resources, capabilities (or lack of), native talents, and environmental restrictions.
Basically, Liberatarianism is an anti-Democratic political philosophy, and really has no economic basis behind it other than "if I can do it, why can't everyone else?".
I am sorry if you feel offended by an automatic poor reaction most liberals or progressives have to the term Libertarian, but the actual definition of that term and the platform of the capital "L" Liberatarian party is a socially destructive policy that worships income inequality and a skewed Survivor game-show type meritocracy with few winners and mostly "useless eater" losers.
Haele
SalviaBlue
(2,918 posts)They just don't like to admit it. They think its more chill to say libertarian. They are still anti-democracy assholes.
ForgedCrank
(1,782 posts)for me.
I think I'm getting the message from this place loud and clear at this point.
Xoan
(25,323 posts)might have been a tell.
ForgedCrank
(1,782 posts)align with Democrats about 95% on everything and have always voted that way.
But this is very enlightening. Apparently it's 100% purity or get lost. At least, that's the way I'm taking it right now.
SalviaBlue
(2,918 posts)If you want to know what libertarianism is all about, dont ask a libertarian, because most of them dont know. A new poll from Pew Research found that only 11% of those surveyed who identified themselves as libertarian were correctly able to identify the very basic meaning of libertarianism as someone whose political views emphasize individual freedom by limiting the role of government. Even though that's often an oxymoron, that's what libertarians say, and their followers apparently don't know it.
haele
(12,679 posts)Moderate and even "fiscally conservative" pro - business Democrats post here with no problems at all.
Plenty of more Radical Liberals get skewered here also - don't ever try to get in the middle of an argument with Bernie Bros and Democratic pragmatists...
However, Libertarian is an actual political party, based on Ayn Rand's Objectivism philosophy. It is an Anti-Democracy political philosophy, with no economic policy other than "take what you can and screw everyone else" behind it.
Seriously. Liberatarians are always trying to paint a friendly, comfortable face over their philosophy, but it's the same old "I want to be free to do what I want" attitude that leads to Monopolies and income inequality.
Haele
MadameButterfly
(1,065 posts)I've heard Bernie Bros accused of stuff by people who don't like Bernie. I've never heard of someone who likes Bernie claiming to be a Bernie Bro.
haele
(12,679 posts)However, the term is usually used to identify the more fanatic supporters of Senator Saunders who will talk over anyone who dare suggest he's not the perfect politician for our time.
Sort of like the term fanboy.
Oddly enough, both terms appear to be applied equally across genders, even though both terms began as the most aggressively vocal supporters tended to be young males.
Haele
MadameButterfly
(1,065 posts)that have nothing to do with Bernie supporters. So be careful about getting on that bandwagon, you might be repeating false accusations.
There might have been some real ones to start, but mostly it's been a term used to smear Bernie. Yes, there are some angry people who fell into the Bernie camp rather than the Trump camp--a more appropriate place to put their anger since Bernie would have really addressed the conditions they are upset about. But none of the actions attributed to Bernie Bros are encourage or supported by Bernie.
Mr.Bill
(24,330 posts)I don't think he's a bad person, but he is politically a bit of a loose cannon. I just hope he doesn't run for Governor.
ForgedCrank
(1,782 posts)Elon Musk fan by any stretch and I never have been.
What is setting me back is the names I am being called here by Democrats.
At this stage, I'm starting to re-think a lot of stuff if this is what people think about me.
jfz9580m
(14,529 posts)It is just that Musk seems more like a hard-right libertarian:
Wired: Lilly Wachowski Slams Elon Musk and Ivanka Trump for Matrix
Where to begin? OK, so, yesterday Tesla CEO Elon Muskwho has had a busy couple weeks of reopening car factories and becoming a fathersent a tweet: Take the red pill, it read, and included a rose emoji. Taking the red pill, for those who dont know, is a reference to the film The Matrix, wherein taking the red pill means opening up ones mind and escaping the simulated world known as the Matrix. In more recent years, red-pilling, has become, as WIREDs Emma Grey Ellis notes, an internet shorthand for having your eyes opened to a certain kind of conservatism thats generally nationalist and often tinged with racism and/or sexism.
Shortly after Musk sent the tweet, Ivanka TrumpPresident Trumps daughter and adviserretweeted it and added Taken! About an hour after Ivanka Trump sent that tweet, Matrix cocreator Lilly Wachowski replied with a simple Fuck both of you.
I think people just detest Musk..my guess is you caught a bit of the spill-over bile intended for Musk and not you ;-/. I was always a bit nonplussed by how so many of the same lefties who dislike zuckercreep, Bezos etc. were neutral on Musk.
Tim Cook is just about the only one of those guys I have some respect for. I always disliked Musk and am happy to see him dropping the mask.
inthewind21
(4,616 posts)No one here has called YOU names. If you're this delicate, then politics and discussions about it you should avoid.
AZSkiffyGeek
(11,070 posts)She said some, yet every Trump supporter thought she was talking about them.
SmallFry
(349 posts)"He's not a right-winger really. He's more of a hard-core libertarian type in the end."
Where on the political spectrum do you place "hard-core libertarian type(s)?
ForgedCrank
(1,782 posts)smack in the middle. Socially very liberal, mostly moderate fiscally. That is exactly where I land, but it appears that isn't good enough even though I am a registered Democrat.
Libertarians have run for office many times here, and I've never voted for one for obvious reasons. And now I get this.
SmallFry
(349 posts)Such a thing does not exist. There is no such thing as a "socially very liberal" libertarian.
"Libertarians have run for office many times here, and I've never voted for one for obvious reasons."
Thank you for not voting for right wingers.
maxrandb
(15,358 posts)They are!
The entire "libertarian" movement was created by Right Wing whack jobs that wanted to be able to say; "I'm not a racist asshat, I am a libertarian, so that means I have the liberty to be a racist asshat".
Libertarians are simply Nazi fucksticks who want to use the power of the state to make Nazi fucksticks acceptable.
Trying to "explain" the difference between Right-Wing Nazis and Libertarians is like trying to teach a goat to sing. It's a waste of time, and it pisses off the goat.
MadameButterfly
(1,065 posts)to determine whether Trump belongs on Twitter.
I wasn't too keen on Musk when he was manipulating Bitcoin markets like it was his personal toy, but now he's playing with democracy.
Maybe we should stop being so paranoid about socialism and look at the dangers of oligarchy.
Hugin
(33,207 posts)Until he bumbled on to how effective blind rage, bigotry, and hatred are at delivering the loyalty and adoration his broken psyche craves.
He used to pretend to be a philanthropist.
Watch for Musk to follow the same pattern.
Tree Lady
(11,498 posts)Kind of like Aaron Rodgers.
He will still get a lot of sales until some other car company can make a electric car as good and as many miles per battery charge.
exboyfil
(17,865 posts)You would be surprised how many conservatives love Tesla (my SIL being one of them).
Midnight Writer
(21,802 posts)Each new acquisition will just add to his wealth.
Eventually he could own everything, if that's what he decides to do.
The invisible hand of the free market will become the iron fist that rules us all.
Only in America!
brush
(53,871 posts)to be made.
SmallFry
(349 posts)Many investors who built their wealth buying business after business weren't all that liquid. Very large daily cash flow but not necessarily liquid to the point of funding the purchases themselves.
AZSkiffyGeek
(11,070 posts)Yeah, it's good for the environment. Yeah, electric cars are the future. But yeah, you're giving money to a grifting Bond villain whose only redeeming quality is that he isn't natural born and can't run for president.
obamanut2012
(26,142 posts)That are not Tesla. They just want to be all cool and FOMO.
Jerry2144
(2,111 posts)Does that mean he hatched from an egg? Or does his species come from spores from Uranus?
He doesnt seem very human
localroger
(3,631 posts)Musk is not a natural born citizen of the United States. This why he had to become a citizen by being "naturalized."
Jerry2144
(2,111 posts)Mixed its target. I do know what it means.
localroger
(3,631 posts)...about Birds Aren't Real when I clicked back and saw that you had left this reply to me.
okaawhatever
(9,462 posts)hurple
(1,306 posts)I thought he was long gone from that company.
obamanut2012
(26,142 posts)And major shareholder and owner.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)Joinfortmill
(14,460 posts)Hugin
(33,207 posts)A winning strategy.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,438 posts)Miguelito Loveless
(4,474 posts)which is the transition to EVs and sustainable nature. He has let his ego get too wrapped up in this skunk fight.
Iggo
(47,568 posts)haele
(12,679 posts)Maybe a few that are truly liberal will, but consider this -
While Tesla has the highest customer satisfaction rating, the cars also have the lowest reliability rating of all Electric vehicles owned.
That means Teslas have recalls and are in the repair shop more often than than other EVs. Also, the factories producing them have safety and workplace violation numbers higher than an Amazon warehouse.
Sooo - Musk isn't worried about Liberals who own Teslas or want to purchase Teslas abandoning him en mass. The Brand -he might as well call it Pandora or Rolex - is what sells his cars, and he knows it.
Haele
SmallFry
(349 posts)His cars are for a singular purpose, data collection. Every progressive should be opposed to TESLA.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)jmowreader
(50,562 posts)Whether its true or not I dont know but considering some of the other things hes done, like the proposed over-the-road tractor with no sleeper, it wouldnt surprise me to learn thats his goal.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Here's a photo of their latest protype WITH A SLEEPER.
?v=1613294427
ecstatic
(32,731 posts)the cool folks will leave twitter, and twitter just becomes "truth social" part 2. For some reason, qOP types are not happy just being amongst themselves. They want to force sane people to view their nonsense.