Abby Finkenauer is back on the ballot for the Iowa Senate race

[LetMyPeopleVote]

Link to tweet

[cilla4progress]

1. Woot!!

👍🏾👍🏾

[LetMyPeopleVote]

2. Iowa Supreme Court: Finkenauer qualifies for Senate ballot

Link to tweet

https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-abby-finkenauer-des-moines-iowa-supreme-court-342ddda6ec47402c9bae06ec7f1c09b5?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP&utm_campaign=SocialFlow

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — The Iowa Supreme Court ruled Friday that Democratic Senate candidate Abby Finkenauer qualifies for the primary ballot, rejecting a lower court decision and allowing her to continue her campaign for the nomination and the chance to face longtime Republican Sen. Charles Grassley.

The court’s decision leaves Finkenauer as the likely front-runner in a race with two lesser-known candidates ahead of Iowa’s June 7 primary. The winner will run against Grassley, who is seeking an eighth term in the Senate.

“This is a moment for all advocates for democracy — Democrats, Republicans and Independents — to celebrate the enduring strength of our democratic process and a reminder to never take it for granted,” Finkenauer said in a statement.

[Nevilledog]

4. I'm sure it will be appealed, but this is the right decision.

[LetMyPeopleVote]

5. This is the highest court in Iowa

I do not see a federal issue.

This is from the AP story cited above

Her lawyer Gary Dickey said the unanimous decision shows the court put politics aside to reach the correct legal result.

The lawyer for the Republican objectors did not immediately respond to a message.

The court rejected a lower court’s ruling that found that Finkenauer failed to meet a state law that requires candidates to submit at least 100 signatures from at least 19 counties to qualify for the ballot. A majority of justices agreed that a Polk County judge was wrong when he ruled that three signatures from two counties were invalid, leaving Finkenauer without enough signatures.

The court said the legislature last year passed new sections of the law that identified specific circumstances when objections to petitions should be sustained.

[Nevilledog]

6. That means nothing these days. They'll appeal anyway.

[ificandream]

3. Great, great news!!

[LetMyPeopleVote]

7. From the ruling

Link to tweet