Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Strelnikov_

(7,772 posts)
1. You think we could at least sell them on ebay
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 09:49 AM
Apr 2022

Considering all the problems, maybe foist them off on Russia, a no returns deal.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
2. I think the US Navy sometimes lends or sells them to other countries
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 09:57 AM
Apr 2022

I know the submarine my father served on in WWII was sold to the Chilean Navy and used by them until it had to be retired.

brewens

(13,582 posts)
3. My dad was a crewman on a PB4Y (Navy B-24) that had been a British Lend Lease aircraft
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 10:09 AM
Apr 2022

they gave back to us. They were long range recon in the south Pacific.

happybird

(4,606 posts)
5. I had a friend who stripped all the classified tech and such (he couldn't really say) off subs
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 10:51 AM
Apr 2022

to prepare them for resale to other countries. The job was in Alexandria Egypt, and they would work there for a few months then come back to the US for a few months. It paid really, really well, but he only did it for about two years because of on the job safety concerns.

 

Dial H For Hero

(2,971 posts)
4. Those particular ships are lousy, getting rid of them makes sense.
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 10:33 AM
Apr 2022

Especially given that the Navy has approved a new frigate (the Constellation class) that will actually be effective.

Happy Hoosier

(7,296 posts)
6. Agreed....
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 11:18 AM
Apr 2022

The design was a bit sus TBH, and the shipyards apparently built really crappy ships.

An experiment that failed pretty spectacularly. It happens.

Happy Hoosier

(7,296 posts)
9. It's not always that easy....
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 12:34 PM
Apr 2022

These projects have a very long developmental cycle and likely the Navy was trying to balance the need to have ships available in the fleet against the risk that the ships could not be improved sufficiently.

As it is, the production runs were drastically cut as it became obvious the ships were fundamentally flawed. Follow-on ship classes will be coming online soon that do not suck and can accommodate the mission. So the crappy ships can go. And expensive mistake.

So the Freedom class has had the roughest time and it's going first. The Intendance class ships will stick arounf longer, last I heard. But I think both classes are not long for the Fleet.

Angleae

(4,482 posts)
8. Except for the reduction gear(transmission) they built exactly what the navy ordered.
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 11:30 AM
Apr 2022

The whole thing was design by committee, every admiral had to have his say. As such they built a patrol boat that could carry a mission module, carry and hangar a helicopter, and go 45 knots.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Good bye ships