General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumskimbutgar
(27,248 posts)Kkk twitter
Wounded Bear
(64,324 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(34,285 posts)the platform and we have to figure out a way to SAY THIS!
onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)Celerity
(54,407 posts)Or, what SHOULD happen, in your opinion?
Many posters here use them for OP's, sometimes as standalone OP's, and also even more use them in replies.
Eliot Rosewater
(34,285 posts)What will happen, nothing will happen.
Almost nobody will leave Twitter even though we all should and nothing will happen just like nothing will ever happen to Trump or any of the high profile Republicans nothing never ever.
I am still going to say we should do it
FoxNewsSucks
(11,704 posts)The lazy will rationalize it because they "keep in touch". It's so much easier than email, texts or phone calls. . .
rockfordfile
(8,742 posts)There's opportunity for another choice.
SoCalDavidS
(10,599 posts)usonian
(25,319 posts)On a slow internet connection (thank you Verizon), they don't preview half the time, and I have to go to twitter, which must use a ton of javascript.
I'd like to see a "legal" way to copy stuff that people want to post here.
In any event, my suspicion is that the twitter app and web pages will be mining bitcoin for Me-Lon.
Celerity
(54,407 posts)You need specific hardware like graphics processing units (GPUs) or, far more likely now, application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) machines that are completely dedicated to solving the ever-increasing in complexity algorithmic computations needed to create a new block.
The Twitter app and its network of servers do nothing of the sort, nor are they connected to the blockchain ledger.
Jack Dorsey, the co-founder and former CEO of Twitter, is into crypto as much as Musk is, if not more.
He IS trying to build a public open mining system that, of course, has nothing to do with Twitter and its network.
Jack Dorseys payments company, Block, is building a system for bitcoin miners
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/13/block-formerly-square-is-building-a-system-for-bitcoin-miners.html
usonian
(25,319 posts)I'll let it go because I personally distrust all of this, crypto-currency and even blockchain, because blockchain is a public ledger and I prefer to keep my books private (it's not a privacy solution, as the authorities have proven many times) Easy enough to dox.
https://www.wpsdlocal6.com/news/hackers-mining-for-bitcoin-using-other-peoples-computers/article_69870eca-3f2e-11ea-9a8f-97f9c90dc773.html
Bitcoins are "mined" using super-computers that work to solve nearly impossible math equations. This takes an enormous amount of processing power. Computers built to mine cryptocurrency cost in excess of $5,000. Rather than buying those computers cyber-criminals are hijacking the computers of random people to do the work for them.
Malware is put on a computer by tricking the user into clicking a link in an email or on a website. The malware allows the hacker to begin using any processing power the computer user isn't using at that moment. If they leave their computer on when they go to bed at night for example, the computer can work through the night using all of its processing power to help the hacker mine for bitcoin. The malware code is available on the Dark Web for $20-$30 and it's easy for a hacker to run a program that installs it on a remote computer. It can even be installed on a computer sharing the same public wifi network.
Many websites have crypto-mining software on them that will use the extra resources of the computer that's connecting to the site. One recent study showed 1 out of 50 websites contain crypto-mining code, and it's also been discovered in ads on YouTube videos.
It will likely go unnoticed but most of the time an infected computer will begin to run much slower. It may also run hot which will be noticeable due to the fans running longer or louder than normal. You would also likely see an increase in your electric bill since the computer will be working harder and running constantly.
Celerity
(54,407 posts)the Twitter network (it would be found quickly) as it would quickly degrade performance and he would be ruined (and in a lot of legal trouble as well) once it was discovered he was doing it. The 1000's of network engineers and network admins at Twitter could never engage in such a mass conspiracy, many would quickly whistleblow.
Also do the maths.
There are only around 1.97 million (out of the total 21 million ever possible (at current rates the last bitcoin will be mined in 2140, so 118 years from now, so unless I live to be 144 years of age, I am not going to see that, lol), with 5 to 7 million of the 21m lost forever due non availability for a multiplicity of reasons, ie death, lost passwords, destroyed hard drives, etc etc) left to be mined
As the supply of unmined BTC goes down, the harder it gets to mine (the system adjusts the complexity of the computations (called proof of work ie PoW) needed to mine a new block to keep new block creation in a balanced state).
The difficulty level for mining in March 2022 was 27.55 trillion. That is, the chances of a computer producing a hash below the target is 1 in 27.55 trillion. To put that in perspective, you are about 91,655 times more likely to win the Powerball jackpot with a single lottery ticket than you are to pick the correct hash on a single try.
There are also millions of other people trying to mine.
At current valuation, even IF Musk was able to mine half of all remaining BTC (basically impossible and would take YEARS, but I will use that figure for my example), the value of that 1 million BTC is LESS (around 40 billion USD) than what he is paying for Twitter itself.
Even if BTC increases by 250%, and hits 100K usd per BTC, you are talking 100 billion usd total value, or only around 29% of what Musk was worth at peak a while back, on November 4, 2021 (340 billion usd, which made him the richest person ever in modern times, passing John D. Rockefeller's inflation adjusted peak net worth)

Tree-Hugger
(3,379 posts)No more tweet of the morning/day/high noon/tea time/night/ twilight, etc.
Seriously, though, there will be no mass exodous from twitter.
FoxNewsSucks
(11,704 posts)or completely agree with those. But I sure wish there was a way we could share those comments and ideas without lining the pockets of America's oligarchs
Tree-Hugger
(3,379 posts)I click on each of those posts. I was just noticing it more today because I realized there are so many of them.
I agree, I wish the oligarchs didn't benefit from our clicks and views.
I_UndergroundPanther
(13,369 posts)So there will be no more ogliarchs.
rogue emissary
(3,352 posts)Scrivener7
(59,522 posts)Celerity
(54,407 posts)was publicly launched on July 15, 2006 (it was then called Twttr, which was soon changed to Twitter)
https://techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/
Or when it started to became more widely used in 2007 and 2008.
The first internet (ARPANET back then) message was sent October 29, 1969, from UCLA, almost 27 years before I was born,


and the first web server (by Tim Berners-Lee) went online in December 1990, at CERN, in Switzerland, close to 6 years before I was born.
![]()
I have no real time exposure to a non web world, and almost none to a non broadband world, as my parents have had broadband in London since late 2000. They got it right around my 4th birthday (I have had this discussion with my father multiple times before in the past, for some academic papers I have written for uni, plus I am just extremely interested in the first 15, 20 years of the world wide web. especially 1992 to 2007 or so, and lately the next 5 years, 2008 to 2012, after which there was a huge change as social media became truly weaponised starting in 2013 or so, and I always want to understand the root foundations of things).
Scrivener7
(59,522 posts)JarOCats
(119 posts)I've given 24 hours' notice to my 11k followers, and am using this time to post whatever the hell I want, and troll the new overlord.
You would not believe how I'm getting piled on by Muskrats, who are certain I'm not going anywhere.
Knowing I have only about 18 hours left before pulling the plug, instead of getting angry and reacting, I'm enjoying fucking with the few I don't already have blocked.
P.S. If anyone is interested, Howard Dean is deactivating too.
dixiechiken1
(2,113 posts)I deactivated and deleted the app today. Though I was more of a lurker, I learned a lot. I'm sorry the assface just couldn't leave it alone. I reeeeeeally don't like that guy. 😒
JarOCats
(119 posts)...which has its own issues some folks object to (e.g., it blocks several countries, such as Russia, China, NK, et al., for security purposes, with which I agree), but it's a very familiar format, and has the sort of rules Musk rails against (but are welcomed by anyone who agrees with DU's rules, as do I), and I'm seeing a ton of new (lefty) users joining by the minute.
There are Android and iOS apps, but here's the website:
https://counter.social/index.html
Look me up.
I more than dislike the guy. He's everything that makes me despair for humanity: wildly narcissistic, unbearably juvenile (fart sounds from a Tesla? really?), completely lacking in empathy, and just too fucking rich.
I wasn't completely sold on the idea of wealth redistribution until the Unholy Trinity of Billionaires came along. Now I want an "Eat the Rich" bumper sticker.
dixiechiken1
(2,113 posts)From all the people leaving Twitter. I tried registering this afternoon and still haven't gotten the confirmation email from them. Tried the resend button a couple times but nothing yet. They're probably overwhelmed. (Good!) I'll try again tomorrow and I'll definitely look you up! Thanks!
JarOCats
(119 posts)See ya later.
SYFROYH
(34,214 posts)Burn, baby, burn.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Midnight Writer
(25,410 posts)like a TV streaming service.
Your pay level will determine how many commercials you have to sit through.
Jerry2144
(3,272 posts)1. We rate Dogs
2. Bette Middler
3. George Takei
4. Mark Hamil
I can find other pushers for my dog addiction.
blogslug
(39,167 posts)They were big but then they were swallowed by whales and disintegrated.
JarOCats
(119 posts)...where your username was something like 77520,85103, and everything was text-based. It was the place to be! (Well, until AOL.)