General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAOC to those who paid off student loans: 'We can support things we we won't directly benefit from'
..."Maybe student loan forgiveness doesn't impact you," Ocasio-Cortez wrote in an Instagram story, in response to a question on the benefits of debt cancellation for those who already paid off their loans. "That doesn't make it bad. I am sure there are certainly other things that student loan borrowers' taxes pay for. We can do good things and reject the scarcity mindset that says doing something good for someone else comes at the cost of something for ourselves."...But most Democrats want to see Biden enact broad student-loan relief for everyone, free of thresholds.
"Instead of continuously extending the pause under pressure," New York Rep. Jamaal Bowman recently tweeted, "he needs to cancel all student loan debt."...
https://www.businessinsider.com/aoc-those-who-paid-off-student-loans-support-debt-forgiveness-2022-5
ck4829
(37,761 posts)They can be freed to do other things, maybe they can do something magnificent, like they can spend time and energy on a cure for cancer rather than repaying student loans.
Diamond_Dog
(40,578 posts)Igirl
(80 posts)Professional degrees that are very expensive arent eligible. Just underwater Easley weaving degrees. Total garbage. My kids went for Engineering, are they ineligible because they chose a degree that has a path?
ck4829
(37,761 posts)bucolic_frolic
(55,143 posts)Things in life are not free. Someone has to pay, even if it's through more inflation (devaluation of our currency).
A token 1% annual taxable income through age 55 would still be a payment that anyone can manage.
ColinC
(11,098 posts)I would argue that most, depending on their success, have likely paid back a substantial amount of what they borrowed -even if they did not officially pay back their loans. As long as you are paying taxes, nothing provided to you through taxes is ever entirely a freebie.
bucolic_frolic
(55,143 posts)Those without college degrees are left behind. Those who paid off their loans, left behind. Those who worked their way through lesser schools left out of the mix.
This proposal is a raw gift to the best and brightest and best educated. I have no problem with interest forgiveness, or payments tied to income. But as it stands it is a freebie to juice the economy so they can "get on with their lives". Where's my freebie? Why do they get new furniture and new cars and new houses and new consumer loans when others didn't?
This program will be popular with those college graduates and their families, but it sure won't reach red counties. And it won't reign in college costs.
canuckledragger
(1,992 posts)You don't like it because YOU aren't getting a piece of it?
There's a word for that kind of thing.
aurora the great
(142 posts)We have many different forms of assistance given to our fellow citizens. So are you saying if you are not directly profiting (in the strictest meaning of the word) you are against these programs Its a long list my friend so think long and hard. Thanks AOC
BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)... it would go to an already well-off group of people who don't need it.
Doremus
(7,273 posts)Those who paid off loans benefit by the end of the DUMBING DOWN of the populace.
BTW, "elitism" is a much-loved repuke meme.
ColinC
(11,098 posts)help the economy long term by improving the credit of millions of people and freeing up a ton of capital that would otherwise be put towards loans, does not seem to be consistent with reality.
Fiendish Thingy
(23,240 posts)colorado_ufo
(6,252 posts)They benefit from their education.
My son has paid off his substantial student loans while raising a family; my daughter just graduation with a doctorate in physical therapy and has big loans which she plans to repay. They never asked mom and dad for a penny.
If I would consider part of this, a medical degree takes so long to acquire, along with internship, residency, and building a practice, that I would suggest subsidizing part of a degree for MD or DO.
Lars39
(26,540 posts)OneGrassRoot
(23,953 posts)Do you think forgiveness should apply then?
ret5hd
(22,502 posts)objections you made to forgiveness of ppp loans?
You may very well have made them
I have no idea.
bucolic_frolic
(55,143 posts)ret5hd
(22,502 posts)1) It's just too much of a freebie
2) Things in life are not free.
3) Someone has to pay, even if it's through more inflation (devaluation of our currency).
4) A token 1% annual taxable income through age 55 would still be a payment that anyone can manage.
qazplm135
(7,654 posts)too much of a freebie?
Someone has to pay to subsidize food stamps, children's lunches, and a whole list of other "freebies." You against those too?
bucolic_frolic
(55,143 posts)and giving nothing to everyone else.
qazplm135
(7,654 posts)and nurses and whatnot with student loans who could use the help, so no idea what you are talking about.
thesquanderer
(13,006 posts)I guess that's part of the discussion... do you give it to those "who could use the help" or do you give it to everyone, regardless of need?
qazplm135
(7,654 posts)is "given to everyone regardless of need."
Most things have limitations or exclusion placed on them.
Biden appears ready to nix high earners from his student debt relief, which I'm fine with.
Addresses the inflation concerns and the unfair concerns some are raising.
Here's the bottom line, we are on track to lose in the Fall. We need some things to happen to win, and one of those things is getting young voters engaged more. SOME sort of student debt relief can do nothing but help that effort.
We need to take a page from Republicans, and start worrying more about politics of a policy rather than engage in fine points about the policy itself.
soldierant
(9,354 posts)
cilla4progress
(26,525 posts)actly.
As a proud Dem I am for helping whomever, however, whenever the opportunity arises. Speaking of middle-income folks.
We are a party of action, support for families, improving life for everyday folks in any way we can!
Calista241
(5,633 posts)My lifestyle suffered so i could pay off my loans.
Skittles
(171,717 posts)tuition should be AFFORDABLE
Diamond_Dog
(40,578 posts)Rs will say Theres nothing in it for me, so it must be costing me something and thats bad.
Ds will say Even though I dont have a student loan, this benefits everyone who is struggling with one, and thats good policy.
spudspud
(647 posts)against student loan forgiveness. Think you're being too kind applying the paint brush of altruism to all Dems.
BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)... people who need it more. Not because I'm against altruism or social safety nets.
spudspud
(647 posts)Celerity
(54,410 posts)BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)are all good ideas. But the idea that we should cancel $50,000 or more for people who don't need it is strange to me.
Celerity
(54,410 posts)forgiveness, not even 10K, and not even if it is capped via wealth, even after they admit that the amount paid by them, their total costs were staggeringly less than what a person nowadays has to pay. Some adopt the classic IGMSFY/drawbridge attitude of 'suck it up, buttercup' (paraphrasing) which is just maddening to see here.
The average total cost of a 4 year public bachelors degree is now over $100K. Also, when you are talking the non wealthy (which, in terms of sheer numbers of debtors, is the vast majority), black households are more impacted by student debt than white households are.
https://www.brookings.edu/research/student-loans-the-racial-wealth-divide-and-why-we-need-full-student-debt-cancellation/
snip
But a college degree does not eliminate the income gaps between white and Black workers. Black students finance their education through debt, and thus college degrees actually further contribute to the fragility of the upwardly mobile Black middle class. And because education does not achieve income parity for Black workers, the disproportionate debt Black students are taking to finance their education is reinforcing the racial wealth gap. Today, the average white family has roughly 10 times the amount of wealth as the average Black family, while white college graduates have over seven times more wealth than Black college graduates.
Most analysts believe there is a student debt problem in the United States, and even conservative scholars acknowledge some debt must be forgiven. Tuition is outpacing students ability to pay, and the share of students taking out loans to finance their degrees rose from roughly half (49%) to over two-thirds (69%) from 1993 to 2012, according to the Pew Research Center. Between 1993 and 2020, the average loan amount grew nearly three-fold, surpassing $30,000. Past discrimination should compel researchers and experts to seek solutions to the student debt crisis that center the experience of Black people. The Black-white wage gap is getting worse, while Black communities indebtedness is increasing. If we can create systems that recognize these lived experiences, we can create more equitable outcomes for everyone.
Figure 1. Changes in student debt and median income by race

A FOCUS ON INCOMES HIDES THE BLACK STUDENT DEBT CRISIS
Disagreement on the extent of the student debt problem tends to center on the positive correlation between educational attainment and income. Scholars who downplay the problem of student debt tend to assume that that relationship is causal, and that student borrowers are largely able to repay their loans out of the higher income their borrowing financed. However, too great a focus on income can lead researchers to wrongly assume that people with similar incomes have the same ability to pay back student loans.
Regardless of the incomes they make after graduation, Black households carry more student debt, which pushes down their creditworthiness. Unsurprisingly, then, Black people with a college degree have lower homeownership rates than white high school dropouts. Moreover, research from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis finds that after college graduation, white households receive wealth transfers from their family to help pay for things like the purchase of a home. Black households, on the other hand, transfer their increased post-college income to help their family. Different patterns of intergenerational transfers contribute to nearly three-quarters of Black borrowers student loans having a higher balance today than they did originally.
Figure 2. Share of loans where current balance exceeds original

snip (much more at the top link)
Figure 3. Changes in median income and student debt, 2009 and 2019

Figure 4. Student debt-to-income ratio by income deciles, 2009 and 2019

Figure 5. Number of borrowers by loan amount and tract median income

Figure 6. Outstanding balance by loan amount and tract median income

Figure 7. Percentage of original balance remaining of borrowers who began repaying loans in 2012, by type of repayment plan

Figure 8. Share of current balances that exceed original, by origination year

ret5hd
(22,502 posts)objections you made to forgiveness of ppp loans?
You may very well have made them
I have no idea.
cilla4progress
(26,525 posts)AMERICA!!
Why saddle young people with giant loans just when the COUNTRY needs them to launch?
It's PATRIOTIC!
TAX THE BILLIONAIRES!
BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)Not just those with student loans? You could argue that people who didn't go to college need money more than those who did.
cilla4progress
(26,525 posts)Give them a head start? They certainly need it in this day and age!
Most of our kids will never be able to buy a home. Child care costs $1k/per kid. Need I mention health care?
As a PROUD DEMOCRAT I am totally supportive of social programs and tax breaks for middle incomers, and would like to see those across the spectrum for young families. This is exactly Joe Biden's agenda!
And, again, you miss my point: IT BENEFITS THE COUNTRY TO GIVE YOUNG PEOPLE A BOOST!
BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)I guess I don't understand why we want to give some young people a massive boost and most other young people nothing at all. Because that's what cancelling student loans would do.
cilla4progress
(26,525 posts)Joe wants to boost all.
Me too.
Sympthsical
(10,969 posts)People say they want, say, more affordable housing. Just not in their neighborhoods. Helping is good in theory. Just don't have any of that helping affect me or my life.
With student loans, there's a similar sentiment. "I didn't get help. Why should others receive help I did not?"
Think of all the different things we as advocate for as liberals and Democrats where this would be completely bizarre and heartless to apply.
-I bought my own house. Why should my taxes pay to help the homeless?
- I don't have a mental illness and/or I went to therapy. Why should I pay for others to receive mental health care?
- I've never had a drug addiction and/or I successfully quit on my own. Why should my taxes pay for addiction treatment?
- I managed to get out of a bad relationship on my own. Why should I pay for women's shelters?
There are so many instances of where we manage our lives just fine and are still ok with our taxes being used to lift others up.
I think a large part of this is generational. All the things I used as examples above are things that people very well might have dealt with in their lives no matter how old they are. They are situations that are universally applicable to human experience in America during their lifetimes.
Modern student loans are different. The concept of how much school costs and how that affects someone's economic health for decades is a completely foreign concept. It never applied to them. The idea that people can be 50 years old and still paying off loans is something they don't wrap their heads around. The idea that people can spend years and years paying off what they can and still have the principle unchanged isn't something they or their peers deal with day to day.
It's being born on second and assuming you managed that double. "Well, I didn't have these problems. Why should I have to pay for them?"
If that's your attitude, how far back to do you want to apply that one? Because once that game starts, keep in mind Millennials and Zoomers will be taking political power over the next decade. And maybe we won't relate to your problems. "Well, I don't have trouble with cost of living because of prescriptions . . ." That's a game people want?
ProfessorGAC
(76,706 posts)But, I'm ok with loan forgiveness. I've seen some proposals that make sense, like forgiving interest, then applying interest already paid against remaining principal.
Another i think makes sense involves a cap on the total representative of typical state school costs. If someone chose to borrow money to go to Yale, i could accept them paying the delta, sans interest.
I got some small academic based money, but when i was in undergrad, a year of college didn't cost nearly the median household income at a state school.
So, comparing what i had to pay, help or not, to what students in the 90s or aughts had to pay is inappropriate. My undergrad (private school) was under 3 grand a year, including books & fees, and i 5ook 20 hours a semester. That was about 1/6th median household income.
The tuition inflation alone is reason to consider forgiving loans.
Colorado Liberal
(558 posts)My daughter has just over $100K in loans, just from her undergrad work, from a public university in Colorado. I'd like to think that some amount of loan forgiveness would be just a part of an overall reform package, to fix the problem of even in-state public university education being unreachable without excessive debt - because if that doesn't get fixed, this problem just comes back in 10 years.
ProfessorGAC
(76,706 posts)...state schools as a baseline.
They are quite expensive, compared to where I went (private school, September '73 to June '76.)
Since many state schools have world class departments, going to a school that costs $70k instead of a state school is fairly often a matter of choice.
In our state, the University of Illinois is $44k all inclusive. And it's a very good school, especially in engineering & sciences. If someone chooses Stanford or Harvard, they might have to borrow all of the $30,000 difference.
I'm not married to a particular proposal, just mentioning some that made some sense to me.
My real point was that I wouldn't benefit from it at all, but I still support some move on student loan forgiveness.
College tuition inflation has been out of control for a long while, and since that tide can't be reversed, other options need to be pursued. One could never convince me that an education today carries 3.5 times the intrinsic value, adjusted for overall inflation, than did mine.
Ms. Toad
(38,642 posts)I've been wrestling with this. I have no trouble at all with forgiving some or all student loan debt (or at least the interest) on the equivalent of a state school education for everyone.
I don't have any student loan debt - but I chose to attend a private school at easily double the cost of a state school. I was able to do so for a number of reasons - the school wanted me to diversify the student body so I had substantial scholarships, and my parents followed the tradition of their parents, and paid for the first degree for each of their children. For us, that was a responsible, affordable choice.
What troubles me is that there are other individuals who made inappropriate choices based on their assessment of risk v. benefit, and have massive debt for 1, 2, or even 3 degrees - some at very pricey schools they will never be able to pay off. Some of these individuals I know personally are living extravagant lifestyles while making minimal payments toward their debts.
I don't think it's appropriate to retroactively subsidize irresponsible choices, because it rewards those who threw caution to the wind and chose a school beyond their (or their family) means - ultimately shifting that burden to peers (and others) who made more responsible choices.
BUT - tuitions are outrageous, and earning a degree even at a state school creates debt equivalent to buying a home. Paying the debt off in amounts proportionate to income balloons the interest to several times the initial debt, and is unsustainable. There needs to be a solution. But, as pointed out above, forgiveness of student loans benefits on the more advantaged 35%-45% of the population with a degree beyond high school. While they are more likely to be able to earn money and pay taxes, it will leave those struggling the most (relatively) disadvantaged.
Perhaps loan forgiveness needs to be coupled with programs that enable those without a post-high school degree to catch up (free tuition at a state school; stipends to permit them to work part-time while attending school, or something). I haven't thought it through - but I'm troubled both by the rewarding poor choices by forgiving all student debt and creating a larger gap between the (formally) educated and those who never had that opportunity.
ProfessorGAC
(76,706 posts)If you saw my reply to the first poster that responded to my first post, you'd see we agree 100% on tuition.
I did the data draw to take my private school tuition & extrapolate it to today, using inflation over these 46 years, PLUS 0.5%.
It comes out such that the University of Illinois costs 3x for tuition, room & board, books and fees, than my costs at a private university, after adjusting.
300% for the same level of education, above inflation-plus. That's flat out outrageous. I can't begin to find a reasonable cause to justify that.
Like you, I got some help based on academic achievement. Paid around 55%. Was eligible for more, but my dad (a Teamster) made "too much money". That still left me with only $1,300-1,400 a year to pay, and my parents started buying savings bonds (remember those?) when I was a baby. So, no borrowing was needed. I don't think that's possible today with the ridiculous cost of college.
Ms. Toad
(38,642 posts)and who have pretty high income to start out with.
My daughter started at the college I attended, the year they first hit $50,000/year. At that time, for the only time in my career, I was making more than double that. My employers did not have a 401(K), or any other tax-sheltered income, so the college counted 100% of my income as available to pay tuition - and 100% of the money I was forced to set aside in savings (intended for retirement - but not in a retirement account -because my employers were the type who like to keep money under their mattress). And the college did not give merit scholarships - only need-based. So she had to pay full ride. We were able to manage it (until she had to drop out for health reasons) because our house was almost entirely paid off and we live very frugally. But we are rare (both in terms of how frugally we have always lived, and because we were blessed with a lot of resources which allowed us - for those few years - to be able to pull exorbitant tuition out of income).
My JD in 1998 was about $7000/year. Same school, 24 years later, $21,400. Inflation gets you to $12,346 but the tuition is 70% higher than inflation at a state school.
geardaddy
(25,392 posts)We don't have kids, but we still pay public school levies. That benefits all of our community.
cilla4progress
(26,525 posts)Can't add a thing!
Amishman
(5,929 posts)Why does capitalism work? because it harnesses human greed as its engine. Why is it abusive and oppressive in its purest form? Because it allows that greed to run rampant against the best interests of the public.
We're not advanced, mature, and altruistic enough as a society to have the majority of the public support something that doesn't benefit themselves.
Student debt relief needs to have at least a few morsels for those who paid them off to avoid narcissism torpedoing it.
ck4829
(37,761 posts)Can we do it? Absolutely.
Should we do it? Absolutely.
But there's a whole section of our economy built into people not paying their bills - medical bills being one of the largest feeders into that - debt buyers and debt collectors.
We have a section of the economy built to go after people at their lowest, on their darkest days. Not everyone hounded by a debt collector is some deadbeat looking to scam everyone, some really are in bad places not of their own personal doing even though we have a lot of people who think that must be the case.
Give the people universal healthcare and the total pool of debts available will shrink... not good for that industry.
arlyellowdog
(1,430 posts)For the poor, disabled, and those without opportunities. For my rich neighbors kid who went to Dartmouth and got a degree in psychology, instead of going to a state school and working 80 hours a week as an accountant: hell no.
Wingus Dingus
(9,173 posts)It's there if and when you need it. It's there for everyone. Giving college grads what amounts to sudden unearned lottery winnings because they invested in college, and themselves, with loans--it benefits nobody but them. I am against it--and I have a son who is currently repaying his student loan and would love for someone to wave a wand to make it magically go away. Life doesn't work that way, though.
Coventina
(29,733 posts)I am 100% in favor of loan forgiveness for anyone for a 2 or 4 year degree.
Graduate student loan forgiveness would have to demonstrate financial need, IMHO.
mzmolly
(52,793 posts)don't want student loan forgiveness.
Dorian Gray
(13,850 posts)(which seems almost impossible now.)
I don't care if loans are forgiven. I would be happy for the people who have bene working off predatory loans for a long time.
But having said that, I FEEL (personally) that we are focusing on the wrong thing here. The last two years have really pointed out how problematic our health care industry is. We should be focusing on reforming that and forgiving all medical debt first. I think the vast majority of our population (even the MAGA weirdos) would agree that medical debt is a problem.
We should have a singer payer healthcare system, and we should be fighting our asses off for that.
But even if just forgiving debt, it should be medical debt.
Captain Zero
(8,905 posts)Funds. But I still think all student loans need to be forgiven and all four year degrees need to be free to the student. Then they can do it in four years from the time they start.
Fuck this bullshit loan system. We don't even need to figure out how to invent this wheel. Other countries already do it. Same with fucking health care.
We can do it like a Chinese Restaurant menu.
One from column Britain, one from column Denmark, one from column Germany, etc.
Put it together over a fucking lunch.
On the back of a fucking napkin.
Quit fucking the fuck around.
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,339 posts)If we just continue to ignore it, we shouldn't be surprised when they don't turn out to vote. Complain all you want, but this is an issue that needs to be addressed. Now.
questionseverything
(11,840 posts)That was the campaign promise
Then announce his administration is looking at the whole picture to decide the next direction of help
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,339 posts)Just ignoring it is horrible optics and won't serve us well.
questionseverything
(11,840 posts)Its a diverse problem that isnt getting figured out quickly
Keeping the ten grand campaign promise is an easy win for us
Celerity
(54,410 posts)is wealth-capped, even if the amount forgiven is $10K. I have seen this over and over, have had interactions with some who resolutely say no no no, even when you prise it out of them that their total costs when they earned their degrees were vastly lower (sometimes by a factor of 10 or 20 times less) compared to today's costs (total costs on a national average for a 4 year public bachelors degree in now iver 100K USD).
As I said above in the thread, some simply revert to a classic IGMSFY/drawbridge stance of (again paraphrasing) 'suck it up, buttercup'.
I even had one who said NO, never, to any adjustments to the interest rates charged (let alone forgive some or all of the interest).
That all, when taken in toto, is the stuff of electoral madness. If Biden adopted and verbalised those posters' stances, we would get flayed alive with the 44yo and under voters, especially the 32yo and unders. There are plenty of older voters too who are still paying off student loan debt.
2024 will be the first election where Millennials and Gen Z equal the actual VOTES, not just potential voters, of Boomers and up, and add in Xennials (born 1977-80), will pass them.
To go full stop NO to doing anything about it would be a disaster.
questionseverything
(11,840 posts)What du thinks doesnt really matter
After the promised ten grand is forgiven we as a country need to seriously look at this debt problem and at how future education is paid for
Celerity
(54,410 posts)as being never promised by Biden.
Here is some evidence he did:
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/what-biden-cant-do-on-student-debt-and-what-he-wont-do
During his first month as President, at a CNN town hall in Milwaukee, Biden was asked how much debt he planned to cancel.
snip
Finally, he concluded, Im prepared to write off the ten thousand dollars debt, but not fifty. Because I dont think I have the authority to do it by a sign of the pen. He appeared to be suggesting that the President has the power to cancel debt up to but not beyond some unspecified amount of moneyan interpretation that is, at best, legally ambiguous.
One of the most frustrating things (to take focus back away from DU) has been that the administration has been sitting for over a year now on the memo Biden ordered the DoE to do about his actual power to forgive student loans via EO. 85 or so congress people, including some in House and Senate leadership, asked him in January to release the memo, and still nothing.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Sen. Elizabeth Warren and dozens of other Democrats on Wednesday called on President Joe Biden to show his cards on student loan forgiveness and release a legal memo his administration prepared about his powers to cancel student debt.
The new request for the documents by 85 House and Senate Democrats comes as progressives are once again ramping up their pressure campaign to convince Biden to cancel large amounts of student debt ahead of the midterm elections.
Publicly releasing the memo outlining your existing authority on cancelling student debt and broadly doing so is crucial to making a meaningful difference in the lives of current students, borrowers, and their families, the lawmakers wrote in a letter to Biden that was shared with POLITICO. It has been widely reported that the Department of Education has had this memo since April 5, 2021 after being directed to draft it.
another source:
Over 80 lawmakers call on Biden to release memo outlining authority to cancel student debt
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/26/over-80-lawmakers-call-on-biden-to-release-memo-on-ending-student-debt-.html
Here is the letter itself, it is public domain so I can legally post it in toto
https://www.warren.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Final%20-%20Letter%20to%20Biden%20Cancelling%20Student%20Loan%20Debt.pdf


















questionseverything
(11,840 posts)Celerity
(54,410 posts)who are in my social sets and also in my age cohort (18-34yo, I am 25 so approaching the dead middle), as is climate change (which is a global issue. as many of us pay/paid little to no uni tuition, as we (I went to both EU (some only UK now as .. fucking Brexit) and US unis) went to EU tuition-free (or ultra low cost) schools.
In the UK it is also now an issue, as the tuition fees exploded there in the past decade or so. I had just turned 14 when the 2010 uni fee riots exploded in the UK, especially near me in London.
















Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)if they don't turn out.
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,339 posts)Both my children are Millennials. Just like with anyone, we need to earn their vote. We aren't doing that.
Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)The amount of money we're talking here (tens of thousands of dollars per individual) is far above what almost any other typical American receives in government funds.
cilla4progress
(26,525 posts)the economy, environment, cost of housing/medical care/education/consumer goods.
It's not a price per se. It's doing right for future generations.
That's my jam, anyway.
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,339 posts)And if you think they don't the comparative price tags of what corporations get from the government compared to student loans, you would be wrong.
betsuni
(29,078 posts)In my opinion. Those who threaten not to vote for Democrats and are very cynical probably won't vote for Democrats anyway. 2020 election had a higher turn out because of the threat of Trump.
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,339 posts)Do we want it to dip more when Boomers and older went for Trump?
betsuni
(29,078 posts)WiVoter
(1,620 posts)Right above
Gore1FL
(22,951 posts)It's a good move for the economy.
BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)Instead of $1.7 trillion to people with student loans, why don't we give $5,000 to every American? That'd also be good for the economy, an arguably a lot fairer.
Gore1FL
(22,951 posts)Having a bunch of new college graduates buying houses and cars every year is going to make a huge impact. Additionally, many will be able to go to college that couldn't before. That will also add to the wealth of the nation.
I submit targeting the investments where they can do the most good will ultimately find it's way to fair results despite it not being directly so.
Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)is problematic for us. I believe many will find this objectionable and I fear it will destroy student loans forever. Also, the idea is young people will vote for us if we do this. Historically, I don't think they will. This should not be done in a midterm. I would prefer to see interest done away with that would be a huge help.
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,339 posts)than any other age demographic, right?
Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)"Which age group has the highest turnout rate in recent presidential elections?
As with past elections, a higher share of women (68.4%) than men (65.0%) turned out to vote. Voter turnout also increased as age, educational attainment and income increased. Voter turnout was highest among those ages 65 to 74 at 76.0%, while the percentage was lowest among those ages 18 to 24 at 51.4%.Apr 29, 2021"
Rob H.
(5,851 posts)Age and generation
A yawning age gap in voter support a pattern that emerged in the 2004 presidential election for the first time since 1972 continues to be evident, with voters under 30 favoring Joe Biden by 24 percentage points (Biden 59%, Trump 35%).
Perhaps reflecting the enduring impact of this long-term age gap, voters ages 30 to 49 were also solidly in the Democratic candidates camp in 2020, favoring Biden by 12 points (55%-43%), similar to Clintons share among this age group. By contrast, older age groups divided fairly evenly between Biden and Trump, a result not too different from 2016.
These patterns also are apparent when the lens is shifted to birth cohorts, or generations groups of voters who share birth years and perhaps formative political experiences in common, such as the popularity of the president at the time they were first eligible to vote. Voters in the youngest adult generations today Generation Z (those ages 18 to 23 in 2020) and the Millennial generation (ages 24 to 39 in 2020) favored Biden over Trump by a margin of 20 percentage points, though Trump gained 8 points among Millennials compared with his 2016 performance. Generation Xers, those ages 40 to 55 in 2020, divided relatively evenly (51% to 48%), as did Baby Boomers. Only among members of the Silent Generation, ages 75 to 92 in 2020, was Trump clearly favored (by 58%-42%). Notably, Boomers and Silents (and the very small number of voters from the Greatest Generation) made up less than half of the electorate in 2020 (44%), compared with just over half in both 2016 and 2018.
Behind Bidens 2020 Victory, An examination of the 2020 electorate, based on validated voters, by Ruth Igielnik, Scott Keeter and Hannah Hartig of the Pew Research Center.
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,339 posts)From Pew Research:

Kind of looks like the Boomers and older let Biden down.
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,339 posts)cuts against your point, since Boomers and older went for Trump. If we want to discourage anyone to vote, it's Boomers and older.
Response to Cuthbert Allgood (Reply #44)
Demsrule86 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Mariana
(15,626 posts)We only NEED the young people to turn out in high numbers because the majority of old people vote Republican.
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,339 posts)But, hey, the older people that voted for Trump turn out at higher rates, so, some random point, I guess.
Torchlight
(6,830 posts)anyone who desires that education. I attended a state uni, and was able to pay for 18- and 20-hour semesters (books, fees, etc.) simply by working a full time summer job.
But if someone's gotta work a full-time job year round just to afford classes today, we've gone off the road somewhere. An educated electorate is one of the most efficient methods of a nation re-investing back into itself.
unitedwethrive
(2,016 posts)If so, should my college daughter take out a bit more money so she is not struggling as much? It would be nice if she could concentrate on just school and not have to have a job. In fact, why would anyone do work-study? What about those starting college in 5 years...or 10? Does this mean that the government will for all time and eternity subsidize any amount of college expense that a student can't pay? Would this not incentivize private colleges to offer less financial aid since the balance will be picked up by the government? And would it incentivize families not to save for their kids educations since they can just take out loans that will be forgiven?
Personally, I would like to see all public colleges and universities without tuition, but that will bring up many more issues. I'm not saying that they are unsurmountable, just that they should be addressed before blanket loan forgiveness.
Zeitghost
(4,557 posts)There are going to be a lot of students who would have never taken loans or taken fewer loans that are going to max out if this goes through. Are we going to leave them hanging in 10 years with debt they assumed would be forgiven? Are we going to keep forgiving college loans forever? Wouldn't that incentivize those issuing loans to jack up the amount they offer? There are a lot of serious unintended consequences nobody is talking about that need to be addressed.
Iggo
(49,928 posts)ecstatic
(35,075 posts)Democrats have done so much amazing shit that most of the population is unaware of. Enough! Get it together in the messaging department first, then act. From where I sit, it looks like a large number of people who directly benefitted from all the pandemic bailouts and/or new laws have no intention of coming out for democrats this year. Completely unacceptable that the party of insurrection will supposedly blow us out this year.
unitedwethrive
(2,016 posts)Dems could cure cancer and no one would know!
SYFROYH
(34,214 posts)$40,000+ in loans, paid off 20 years later for a total of $80,000+.
I'm happy that others will benefit from loan forgiveness.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Does the Freshman class assume that, eventually, someone will write off their college debt? Do they plan on that basis?
Do the 1%ers have their kids take out loans on the chance that they'll get them forgiven as well?
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,339 posts)but this is a step to help those that are hurting because of the fucked up system.
BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)... to a fairly small part of the population (12%) that is already better off than the average American.
Heck, according to proponents of cancelling student debt, $500 billion of it would go to people in the top 20% of income.
I really am having a hard time understanding why the progressive wing of the party is so enamored of a massive social program that is regressive in nature and leaves out nearly 90% of the population.
Wingus Dingus
(9,173 posts)buy their loyalty and votes. End of story.
BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)Dems are struggling badly with white working class people. A gigantic giveaway to the college educated, who already have higher income and a brighter future, is going to be very unpopular.
I'm also not really fond of the idea that the president can unilaterally waive $1.7 trillion in student loans. I very much doubt that Congress had that in mind when they wrote the bill that loan forgiveness proponents are citing. Have the people who are arguing for this so strongly tried bringing up bills for a vote in Congress? AOC, Schumer, and Warren are all in Congress. Schumer in particular can bring up a vote if he wants to.
Mariana
(15,626 posts)It is also in the Democratic Party Platform.
Iggo
(49,928 posts)Thats just fuckin weird.
BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)That's what makes it a strange thing for progressives to support.
cilla4progress
(26,525 posts)some data?
Apologies that I gotta claim ignorance...
Someone else upthread mentioned that the 1% are not included in loan forgiveness?
BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)I should say I think certain things can be done to make student loan forgiveness more progressive (i.e. lowering the amount of forgiveness by income, for example). As it stands, however, blanket forgiveness tends to target those who are already making more money. (Which makes sense, since college graduates make more money than non-college graduates.)
Celerity
(54,410 posts)Institution) that deals with the racial aspects of student loan debt loads and the racial wealth gap.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216647614#post89
Zeitghost
(4,557 posts)Many have student loans and want to see them gone. It doesn't matter that it really only benefits those who are just fine or on their way to being just fine financially, it doesn't matter that it creates a huge incentive for everyone going to college in the future to max out their student loans, regardless of need. They want to stop making those monthly strokes.
I get it, I'm one of them. My wife and I are slowly paying off a European luxury sedan worth of loans. But we're fine, we have a comfortable lifestyle. Without extreme financial aid/student loan/tuition reform, passing this would be a financial disaster.
Zeitghost
(4,557 posts)I'm worried about those who will now max out every loan they can get in hopes of getting in on the next round of loan forgiveness.
Without substantial and comprehensive student loan reforms, it would be a disaster.
Alhena
(3,076 posts)Both from the transfer of wealth perspective and from the fact that every 19 year old is going to be trying to get his hands on every dollar he can borrow.