Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LuckyCharms

(22,648 posts)
Tue May 3, 2022, 10:28 AM May 2022

Due to sheer intuition only, I feel that the impending abortion ruling will not stand.

Last edited Tue May 3, 2022, 11:09 AM - Edit history (1)

I'm not well versed enough concerning the abortion issue to say why I feel this way, but I do have some general thoughts.

1) Outrage will continue to build until the decision becomes official (I believe in June?).

2) I'm old enough to remember Roe v Wade.

A panel of people...and when thinking about it, all the Supreme Court is...is a simple panel of people...is going to make an attempt to take away a basic right that has been "allowed" or "given" by a similar similar group of people in 1973. It seems (I don't know exactly how to describe this thought), it seems inherently wrong that any human right is something that is to be "granted" to someone else. It is just something that should "be", instead of "decided" by some people who make up a distinct branch of government. This branch is said to be separate from, and free from the influence of, the other branches of government, but it's no big secret that this is bullshit.

3) The rage and fury generated by this decision is not going to be anything like the protests before Roe v Wade. It's going to be much more furious. Can you recall any men freely referring to themselves as "feminists" in 1973? I can't. I'm not saying that men who were feminists did not exist in 1973, but it was not as openly discussed as it is today.

I consider myself to be a feminist, and I'm saying that without knowing the actual correct definition of feminism. But speaking from my heart, what feminism means to me is as follows: Women are people, men are people. Every human being is a person, regardless of gender, age. color, or any other variable. As such, I think women's rights, and men's rights, and black rights, or LGBTQ rights...are really just different flavors of human rights. "Rights" all fall under the same umbrella. Therefore, women's rights are human rights, and humans are not "baby vessels", unless they freely decide that they wish to carry a baby. Being forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy is a physical assault on a woman's body. A woman is the only one who owns her body, just as I am the only one who owns my body.

So, I'm not saying that a group of people deciding laws is not needed, of course it is needed. However, I think most normal people also realize that when it comes to the issue of human rights, there is something not exactly copacetic about what boils down to be at least a partially politically motivated body of individuals deciding that human rights should be taken away, should be removed, as if they don't exist. There is something not exactly right about a group of people telling a woman, or anyone one else, what to do with an unwanted group of cells within their own body.

4) To conclude: The outrage against this ruling isn't going to be anything like the outrage that led up to the Roe v Wade decision. It's more than predominantly women who are seething with intense rage now. Plenty of men are having the same feelings. You assault my sister, then you assault me. You assault my fellow human? Better tuck your chins in and put your hands up to protect yourself fuckers, because you're assaulting me too.

5) I'm not proud of the following: I had a long dead relative (not an immediate relative) who was an abortionist. I've heard the stories. He had zero medical training, but he performed abortions. In hotel rooms. With non-sterile "equipment". He butchered high school girls. For money. He went to prison for it.

We will not go back to those days. Fury and sheer force is going to somehow kill this ruling. I'm just not sure of the mechanism that will stop it, but it will be stopped.

66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Due to sheer intuition only, I feel that the impending abortion ruling will not stand. (Original Post) LuckyCharms May 2022 OP
K&R Blue Owl May 2022 #1
They are certainly showing their hand finally jfz9580m May 2022 #2
The good laws extend rights... Hugin May 2022 #3
I don't think that laws extend or grant rights. wnylib May 2022 #25
Very true. Hugin May 2022 #55
But if a right is made illegal, does it remain to be a right, LuckyCharms May 2022 #65
That there must be one of those inalienable rights. Hugin May 2022 #66
it's a draft. it's possible mopinko May 2022 #4
Is it possible this was a trial balloon? Aristus May 2022 #6
i'm dying to know who leaked it. mopinko May 2022 #8
Could have been a Con Judge too. SergeStorms May 2022 #22
it's possible. mopinko May 2022 #24
I have been thinking that, too, only wnylib May 2022 #26
yeah, i'd say the help is most likely. mopinko May 2022 #27
I was thinking exactly that, I think it is definitely either a trial ballon or the real thing ToxMarz May 2022 #46
I'm hoping TlalocW May 2022 #49
It's also possible wryter2000 May 2022 #35
conehead is my bet. that's what she was put there for. mopinko May 2022 #38
good post markie May 2022 #5
You understand exactly what I am trying to express. LuckyCharms May 2022 #13
LOL, it is not gonna be changed BradAllison May 2022 #7
I didn't necessarily imply that it would not pass. LuckyCharms May 2022 #9
LOL, that's a nice idea BradAllison May 2022 #12
What's with the LOL's? LuckyCharms May 2022 #14
+1 honest.abe May 2022 #15
I'm a cynic, and I stunned so many people believed it wasn't coming BradAllison May 2022 #16
I knew it was coming as well. LuckyCharms May 2022 #17
So, anger.....I'll put you at 3 BradAllison May 2022 #18
You do that. LuckyCharms May 2022 #21
So, stages of compassion and sensibility, wnylib May 2022 #36
Wait till America finds out how close we are to mass nuclear destruction BradAllison May 2022 #52
What are you doing about it? LuckyCharms May 2022 #60
Cynic or not, there is nothing wnylib May 2022 #30
It depends on congress overriding the decision iemanja May 2022 #10
Need 60 votes- No way ramapo May 2022 #19
K&R smirkymonkey May 2022 #11
K&R mac56 May 2022 #20
K&R llmart May 2022 #23
over the course of the series, they've grappled w all aspects mopinko May 2022 #28
Yes, they have. llmart May 2022 #29
i subscribe to pbs each time a new year drops. mopinko May 2022 #31
I have been a PBS fan for years. llmart May 2022 #32
Vera Drake markie May 2022 #33
The right needs the abortion issue to drive turnout IronLionZion May 2022 #34
You're probably right. Especially considering that most of them LuckyCharms May 2022 #39
Could this leak be an effort to distract us from Thomas and his wife or some other dastardly deed? Cozmo May 2022 #37
The Jan 6 hearings are due to start in ??June?? Karma13612 May 2022 #43
Totally agree - and there's another way of looking at this too FakeNoose May 2022 #40
You said it better than I ever could. Good post. LuckyCharms May 2022 #42
I disagree with your statement that ... Whiskeytide May 2022 #53
Thank you, Lucky... MiHale May 2022 #41
If they cared about the will of the majority they would not lie cheat and steal to get here ZonkerHarris May 2022 #44
They haven't driven this far just to shift into reverse. N/t LiberatedUSA May 2022 #45
All your points are great but I think this or something like this will be the final outcome Buckeyeblue May 2022 #47
All good points. However this turns out, it's going to be a pivotal LuckyCharms May 2022 #48
I hope. I think of Republican senators only 2 are pro choice Buckeyeblue May 2022 #54
Nope. The RW has wanted this for decades. They can't be shamed Arazi May 2022 #50
This is just the start of what the repugs have planned. lark May 2022 #51
I think you are wrong Brenda May 2022 #56
What did I type that indicates that I see it abstractly? LuckyCharms May 2022 #58
Who would we appeal it to? gldstwmn May 2022 #57
I do not know. LuckyCharms May 2022 #59
I doubt your doubt. LiberatedUSA May 2022 #61
Well, you're actually not doubting my doubt because LuckyCharms May 2022 #62
It has to be enough to overcome gerrymandering. N/t LiberatedUSA May 2022 #63
I agree, but there's no reason it couldn't be enough. LuckyCharms May 2022 #64

jfz9580m

(17,188 posts)
2. They are certainly showing their hand finally
Tue May 3, 2022, 10:39 AM
May 2022

I knew this was how they think but well one always hopes..

Hugin

(37,848 posts)
3. The good laws extend rights...
Tue May 3, 2022, 10:43 AM
May 2022

Bad laws attempt to control behavior and are generally unenforceable.

"Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." - Good law.

But, there are a few who lay awake nights outraged that somewhere, somehow someone is happy.

wnylib

(26,014 posts)
25. I don't think that laws extend or grant rights.
Tue May 3, 2022, 01:09 PM
May 2022

They only acknowledge the rights that already exist.

LuckyCharms

(22,648 posts)
65. But if a right is made illegal, does it remain to be a right,
Tue May 3, 2022, 07:21 PM
May 2022

or just something that is referred to as a right, when effectively, it doesn't exist anymore?

If I have two legs that are non-functional, I can still say that I have legs, but when in actuality, they might as well be cement blocks, because to me, they are useless.

Same thing with rights. Sure, a right can be called a right, but if you are denied the use of that right, does it remain a right?

Hugin

(37,848 posts)
66. That there must be one of those inalienable rights.
Tue May 3, 2022, 08:34 PM
May 2022

Self-evident.

Voting is an example in a democracy.

Trying to tell people who they can and cannot love is a bad law.

I would say rights remain rights even if some fool comes along and tries to make them illegal. (See my post above about trying to control human behavior with laws.)

mopinko

(73,726 posts)
4. it's a draft. it's possible
Tue May 3, 2022, 10:44 AM
May 2022

that the blowback changes the final ruling. not hopeful, but it could be scaled back.

Aristus

(72,187 posts)
6. Is it possible this was a trial balloon?
Tue May 3, 2022, 11:31 AM
May 2022

I sure hope so, and that it pops in their faces.

mopinko

(73,726 posts)
8. i'm dying to know who leaked it.
Tue May 3, 2022, 11:37 AM
May 2022

i'm guessing it was a last ditch effort of someone on our side.
a parting shot from breyer?

SergeStorms

(20,591 posts)
22. Could have been a Con Judge too.
Tue May 3, 2022, 01:00 PM
May 2022

They said on "Morning Joe" that a conservative may have done it to "lock in" the Judges decisions. That way the Holy Rollers would know who attack if they dared change their minds later.

wnylib

(26,014 posts)
26. I have been thinking that, too, only
Tue May 3, 2022, 01:11 PM
May 2022

I thought of a law clerk, not Breyer. Giving us a heads up.

ToxMarz

(2,930 posts)
46. I was thinking exactly that, I think it is definitely either a trial ballon or the real thing
Tue May 3, 2022, 02:07 PM
May 2022

and they are tying to get the outrage out of the system and pushback early enough before the mid-terms to not hurt them so much. If the supreme court waited until mid summer to drop this steaming pile of shite, repukes may be in more trouble than they can deal with as the elections roll around

TlalocW

(15,675 posts)
49. I'm hoping
Tue May 3, 2022, 02:52 PM
May 2022

That maybe the Justices' clerks prepare statements for both ways a case could go, and there's another paper referring to the case from the opposite perspective. I'm 95% sure it's not the case, but there is a little bit of hope.

TlalocW

wryter2000

(47,940 posts)
35. It's also possible
Tue May 3, 2022, 01:26 PM
May 2022

That Roberts will find another "justice" to write a more reasonable sounding decision that will have the same effect. I don't know how much power he has over the others, but it's my understanding that he can assign the majority opinion. He won't use Alito's but will ask Gorsuch or Coney-Barrett to write another one that he'll use.

mopinko

(73,726 posts)
38. conehead is my bet. that's what she was put there for.
Tue May 3, 2022, 01:33 PM
May 2022

they have the delusion that this goes down better written by a woman.

markie

(24,017 posts)
5. good post
Tue May 3, 2022, 11:30 AM
May 2022

and I am not convinced that this is a done deal... but, your reasoning is one of an older person, like many of us, that fully understands life before Roe v Wade...

there are millions of young men and women that may be concerned but don't really, really understand the implications, and haven't seen and heard about the hundreds dead and damaged from botched self-induced abortions... I was one of the lucky ones and successfully ended an unwanted pregnancy by myself... many weren't as fortunate

LuckyCharms

(22,648 posts)
13. You understand exactly what I am trying to express.
Tue May 3, 2022, 12:00 PM
May 2022

First, I am sorry, and I feel for you, concerning what you faced at the time.

I know the details of my relative's activities. I know how he did it. I've heard first hand accounts of the lengths women had to go through to get an abortion before Roe v Wade.

I dated few women when I was younger who have had abortions, and know the emotional turmoil they went through, even though they had their abortions under the best possible conditions. Throw legal complications on top of that already difficult decision...

And you are right, unless you're at least somewhat familiar with what it was like back then, it's difficult to really have an understanding of what's going to happen should this ruling be officially passed.

All of this stuff actually blows my mind. Both women and men get raped. But if a woman gets raped, she might get pregnant. Why is she forced to carry and nurture the result of a rape? Pregnancy can kill a woman. Why is she forced to suffer that risk? What if a woman simply does not want a baby at that point in her life? What if she never wants to have a baby? It's her choice!! No one else is going to have to carry, deliver, nurture and raise that baby but her! So it's her choice, period!

BradAllison

(1,879 posts)
7. LOL, it is not gonna be changed
Tue May 3, 2022, 11:31 AM
May 2022

Sam Alito will hold a gun to every justice's head as the decision is issued.Literally. Yes I mean literally.

LuckyCharms

(22,648 posts)
9. I didn't necessarily imply that it would not pass.
Tue May 3, 2022, 11:45 AM
May 2022

What I did imply was the following:

Even if it passes, it will not stand. That's why I specifically used the wording "will not stand".

It will be revisited due to the chaos which ensues, or it will be negated with creative legal work-arounds at the the federal level.

BradAllison

(1,879 posts)
12. LOL, that's a nice idea
Tue May 3, 2022, 11:55 AM
May 2022

There are seven stages of grief. You are now in Denial, but ready for 3 which is bargaining.

LuckyCharms

(22,648 posts)
14. What's with the LOL's?
Tue May 3, 2022, 12:03 PM
May 2022

Maybe you can perhaps discuss the issue in a more reasonable manner without fucking mocking me with the LOL's?

What do you say? Give it a try.

Otherwise, you are not going to like my responses, because I know how to mock people as well.

BradAllison

(1,879 posts)
16. I'm a cynic, and I stunned so many people believed it wasn't coming
Tue May 3, 2022, 12:08 PM
May 2022

And now, "we can fix it". Now, at the 11th hour, we can do something, that's the LOL.

This day was coming. It's been coming since 2001. I'm just surprised it got here two months earlier than I though.

Just remember, Sam Alito is doing this. Not a Trump appointee. A Bush appointee. Just to remind you when the die was cast.

LuckyCharms

(22,648 posts)
17. I knew it was coming as well.
Tue May 3, 2022, 12:19 PM
May 2022

If you are implying that people on DU didn't know, I think you are wrong.

So now the country at large will know. And it will hit them like a ton of bricks after it takes about a week to set in.

One more thing. You can be both a cynic, and polite at the same time. I'm stunned more people don't know that.

And yet another LOL in the body of your post!

You're a PEACH, Brad! A master of subtlety and understatement. Good job!

BradAllison

(1,879 posts)
52. Wait till America finds out how close we are to mass nuclear destruction
Tue May 3, 2022, 03:13 PM
May 2022

BOY I HOPE SOMEONE DOES SOMETHING ABOUT THIS!!!!

iemanja

(57,757 posts)
10. It depends on congress overriding the decision
Tue May 3, 2022, 11:47 AM
May 2022

by passing a law protecting abortion rights. I think that can be done with a couple of Republican votes. I see Murkowski voting for such a bill.

I don't think popular outrage will affect the court.

llmart

(17,617 posts)
23. K&R
Tue May 3, 2022, 01:05 PM
May 2022

The PBS series "Call the Midwife" dealt very significantly with what abortion was like prior to Roe v Wade, albeit in London. It as quite graphic and unsettling to watch, but for those who aren't old enough, maybe they should watch that episode. I'm old enough to remember it and old enough to know women who had babies they didn't want because they couldn't get a legal abortion.

mopinko

(73,726 posts)
28. over the course of the series, they've grappled w all aspects
Tue May 3, 2022, 01:15 PM
May 2022

of reproductive health care. they've done an excellent job.

llmart

(17,617 posts)
32. I have been a PBS fan for years.
Tue May 3, 2022, 01:24 PM
May 2022

I watch that more than any other station. The only other subscription I have is Netflix.

IronLionZion

(51,268 posts)
34. The right needs the abortion issue to drive turnout
Tue May 3, 2022, 01:24 PM
May 2022

they probably can't get enough votes on LGBT and CRT hate alone. If inflation gets under control, they have nothing to run on.

This could easily be a test to see how the public responds.

LuckyCharms

(22,648 posts)
39. You're probably right. Especially considering that most of them
Tue May 3, 2022, 01:37 PM
May 2022

couldn't care less about abortion, child predators, groomers, CRT, or whatever the heck else they are harping on these days.

They literally do not have a platform, so the only way they can try to steer the election (besides their normal blatant cheating) is by throwing stuff at the wall to see what sticks.

Cozmo

(1,402 posts)
37. Could this leak be an effort to distract us from Thomas and his wife or some other dastardly deed?
Tue May 3, 2022, 01:30 PM
May 2022

Karma13612

(4,981 posts)
43. The Jan 6 hearings are due to start in ??June??
Tue May 3, 2022, 01:43 PM
May 2022

By having this bombshell drop now, the GOP are hoping that people will pay attention to this instead of the hearings which focus on GOP criminal activity.

Just a guess.

FakeNoose

(41,634 posts)
40. Totally agree - and there's another way of looking at this too
Tue May 3, 2022, 01:40 PM
May 2022

I believe that MOST of the Repukes are Pro-Choice, most want to see the Roe v. Wade ruling stand. However they realize that they made a deal with the devil - so to speak - when they teamed up with the ultra-religious RWNJs because they needed the votes. The deal they made was, they would see that Roe is overturned. Well they have to go through with that because that was the deal. BUT once it's done they are through with the crazy ultra-religion anti-abortionists for good.

Most sensible Repukes are Pro-Choice and if they don't realize it now, they will very soon when they see how it affects their own children and families. They'll understand that there was a reason for that ruling and it had nothing to do with "religion." It had everything to do with women's rights over their own bodies and their own health.

If Roe gets overturned by the Supreme Court, we can be sure the public outcry will be amazing and terrible. Pro-Choice laws will be passed in every state, or ultimately there will be a federal law passed that undercuts the individual states. It will no longer be left up to the Supreme Court to "rule" anything because legal framework will finally be setup that will remove their discretion.

Whiskeytide

(4,656 posts)
53. I disagree with your statement that ...
Tue May 3, 2022, 03:16 PM
May 2022

…” BUT once it's done they are through with the crazy ultra-religion anti-abortionists for good.”

They still need votes to STAY in power. They will still need to court the evangelicals - now even more so since this “victory” for them will galvanize their “enemies”. The new platform plank will be that the libruls want to make abortion legal again. Vote for us to stop them.

The battle over choice will probably never end. For the left, Roe was a reasonable compromise. For the far right, there simply is no compromise - ever. The simple fact that the new R party is unwilling to even make exceptions for cases of rape, incest and the life of the woman is all the proof you need that they are not at all rational about this issue.

MiHale

(13,032 posts)
41. Thank you, Lucky...
Tue May 3, 2022, 01:41 PM
May 2022

You’ve put into words many of the emotions I have and just couldn’t. I am an older man raised by a strong, intelligent, independent woman married for 49 years to a woman that cut from the same bolt of cloth. Not sure of the exact definition of feminism either, but yours fits my same belief.

People are people and should have equal opportunities and rights across the board end of argument.

If/when women that have been raped are forced to birth that baby THEY ARE BEING RAPED AGAIN but this time by the government.

 

ZonkerHarris

(25,577 posts)
44. If they cared about the will of the majority they would not lie cheat and steal to get here
Tue May 3, 2022, 01:44 PM
May 2022

but they did cause they don't care about the majority of voters
those are the people they want to disenfranchise and control.

Buckeyeblue

(6,352 posts)
47. All your points are great but I think this or something like this will be the final outcome
Tue May 3, 2022, 02:18 PM
May 2022

And then it will be up to us as a country to decide how we want to live. Do cross over voters who support civil rights but maybe don't like to pay taxes decide that maybe paying taxes is better than living in a theocracy?

Will the people who stayed home on Hillary or voted for Jill Stein out of protest (of what I've never been sure) see the error of their way and repent?

LuckyCharms

(22,648 posts)
48. All good points. However this turns out, it's going to be a pivotal
Tue May 3, 2022, 02:47 PM
May 2022

point in our history.

I tend to think that many people, including at least a few republicans, are going to get so fed up immediately, that something will have to change with either the decision, or the court itself. It all depends on the seriousness and duration of the guaranteed uprisings.

But again, I'm not smart enough to know what the mechanism of the change will be. There is always a line that cannot be crossed when it concerns an issue like this, but then again, I initially thought that there was no way that tfg would end up in the whitehouse, so I certainly could be wrong.

Buckeyeblue

(6,352 posts)
54. I hope. I think of Republican senators only 2 are pro choice
Tue May 3, 2022, 04:27 PM
May 2022

Romney was pro choice when he needed to be but not now. We really need a constitutional amendment establishing a right to privacy. I don't know how we do that though.

Arazi

(8,887 posts)
50. Nope. The RW has wanted this for decades. They can't be shamed
Tue May 3, 2022, 02:57 PM
May 2022

I gave up on hope porn years ago.

Brace yourself because Roe is going down followed by Griswold and then Obergefell. In fact, I would guess they’ll be attacked within hours of the Roe decision becoming official.

lark

(26,081 posts)
51. This is just the start of what the repugs have planned.
Tue May 3, 2022, 03:11 PM
May 2022

I don't think there is any way to stop it, they are determined to destroy womens' lives & force them to have babies. Next goes the right to free education and away goes Medicare and Social Security and 8 hour workday and OT. That will create a nstion of poor that will have np education, will work for pennies, get sick & injured & die young because they could not afford any care. That is what these fuckers want and have worked for the past 50 years. If they steal the 2022 election & then the 2024, America will be done forever and we will become just like Russia = no options & lives of dreary desperation from huge crowded families.

Brenda

(2,054 posts)
56. I think you are wrong
Tue May 3, 2022, 06:18 PM
May 2022

Your post is another piece of evidence that men and women see this situation completely differently.

Men see it abstractly.

Women see it with their fucking guts, literally.

gldstwmn

(4,575 posts)
57. Who would we appeal it to?
Tue May 3, 2022, 06:23 PM
May 2022

Wouldn't a brand new case have to work its way through the courts first? That will take years.

LuckyCharms

(22,648 posts)
59. I do not know.
Tue May 3, 2022, 06:42 PM
May 2022

That's what I meant when I stated that I do not know the mechanism.

I just have a feeling that this is going to be a turning point because the backlash is going to be so severe that a ban is going to prove to be untenable.

 

LiberatedUSA

(1,666 posts)
61. I doubt your doubt.
Tue May 3, 2022, 06:53 PM
May 2022

This is their holy grail. Plus, they intend to attempt to steal the next two elections and turn America into an autocracy.

Only massive, massive Democratic voter turn out will stop this. If not, America will be radically different very soon.

LuckyCharms

(22,648 posts)
62. Well, you're actually not doubting my doubt because
Tue May 3, 2022, 06:58 PM
May 2022

a massive, historical Democratic voter turn out would be the natural result of massive pushback on this issue.

LuckyCharms

(22,648 posts)
64. I agree, but there's no reason it couldn't be enough.
Tue May 3, 2022, 07:06 PM
May 2022

That's what I'm saying. This could be the issue where even the most politically unaware voters finally say "enough is enough".

The abortion issue touches each of us, personally, in one way or another. I'm not saying that everyone has had an abortion. What I'm saying is, most of us know someone who has, loved someone who has, or knows and/or loves someone that may want or need to have an abortion in the future.

This is something that women have been legally and rightly "allowed" to have for 50 years. When you take away something that people are used to having, especially if it is something to be considered a basic right, the shit hits the fan pretty quickly.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Due to sheer intuition on...