General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDue to sheer intuition only, I feel that the impending abortion ruling will not stand.
Last edited Tue May 3, 2022, 11:09 AM - Edit history (1)
I'm not well versed enough concerning the abortion issue to say why I feel this way, but I do have some general thoughts.
1) Outrage will continue to build until the decision becomes official (I believe in June?).
2) I'm old enough to remember Roe v Wade.
A panel of people...and when thinking about it, all the Supreme Court is...is a simple panel of people...is going to make an attempt to take away a basic right that has been "allowed" or "given" by a similar similar group of people in 1973. It seems (I don't know exactly how to describe this thought), it seems inherently wrong that any human right is something that is to be "granted" to someone else. It is just something that should "be", instead of "decided" by some people who make up a distinct branch of government. This branch is said to be separate from, and free from the influence of, the other branches of government, but it's no big secret that this is bullshit.
3) The rage and fury generated by this decision is not going to be anything like the protests before Roe v Wade. It's going to be much more furious. Can you recall any men freely referring to themselves as "feminists" in 1973? I can't. I'm not saying that men who were feminists did not exist in 1973, but it was not as openly discussed as it is today.
I consider myself to be a feminist, and I'm saying that without knowing the actual correct definition of feminism. But speaking from my heart, what feminism means to me is as follows: Women are people, men are people. Every human being is a person, regardless of gender, age. color, or any other variable. As such, I think women's rights, and men's rights, and black rights, or LGBTQ rights...are really just different flavors of human rights. "Rights" all fall under the same umbrella. Therefore, women's rights are human rights, and humans are not "baby vessels", unless they freely decide that they wish to carry a baby. Being forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy is a physical assault on a woman's body. A woman is the only one who owns her body, just as I am the only one who owns my body.
So, I'm not saying that a group of people deciding laws is not needed, of course it is needed. However, I think most normal people also realize that when it comes to the issue of human rights, there is something not exactly copacetic about what boils down to be at least a partially politically motivated body of individuals deciding that human rights should be taken away, should be removed, as if they don't exist. There is something not exactly right about a group of people telling a woman, or anyone one else, what to do with an unwanted group of cells within their own body.
4) To conclude: The outrage against this ruling isn't going to be anything like the outrage that led up to the Roe v Wade decision. It's more than predominantly women who are seething with intense rage now. Plenty of men are having the same feelings. You assault my sister, then you assault me. You assault my fellow human? Better tuck your chins in and put your hands up to protect yourself fuckers, because you're assaulting me too.
5) I'm not proud of the following: I had a long dead relative (not an immediate relative) who was an abortionist. I've heard the stories. He had zero medical training, but he performed abortions. In hotel rooms. With non-sterile "equipment". He butchered high school girls. For money. He went to prison for it.
We will not go back to those days. Fury and sheer force is going to somehow kill this ruling. I'm just not sure of the mechanism that will stop it, but it will be stopped.
Blue Owl
(59,105 posts)jfz9580m
(17,188 posts)I knew this was how they think but well one always hopes..
Hugin
(37,848 posts)Bad laws attempt to control behavior and are generally unenforceable.
"Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." - Good law.
But, there are a few who lay awake nights outraged that somewhere, somehow someone is happy.
wnylib
(26,014 posts)They only acknowledge the rights that already exist.
They enshrine and codify rights. Rights are always there.
LuckyCharms
(22,648 posts)or just something that is referred to as a right, when effectively, it doesn't exist anymore?
If I have two legs that are non-functional, I can still say that I have legs, but when in actuality, they might as well be cement blocks, because to me, they are useless.
Same thing with rights. Sure, a right can be called a right, but if you are denied the use of that right, does it remain a right?
Hugin
(37,848 posts)Self-evident.
Voting is an example in a democracy.
Trying to tell people who they can and cannot love is a bad law.
I would say rights remain rights even if some fool comes along and tries to make them illegal. (See my post above about trying to control human behavior with laws.)
mopinko
(73,726 posts)that the blowback changes the final ruling. not hopeful, but it could be scaled back.
Aristus
(72,187 posts)I sure hope so, and that it pops in their faces.
mopinko
(73,726 posts)i'm guessing it was a last ditch effort of someone on our side.
a parting shot from breyer?
SergeStorms
(20,591 posts)They said on "Morning Joe" that a conservative may have done it to "lock in" the Judges decisions. That way the Holy Rollers would know who attack if they dared change their minds later.
mopinko
(73,726 posts)likely the help, tho, i think.
wnylib
(26,014 posts)I thought of a law clerk, not Breyer. Giving us a heads up.
mopinko
(73,726 posts)ToxMarz
(2,930 posts)and they are tying to get the outrage out of the system and pushback early enough before the mid-terms to not hurt them so much. If the supreme court waited until mid summer to drop this steaming pile of shite, repukes may be in more trouble than they can deal with as the elections roll around
TlalocW
(15,675 posts)That maybe the Justices' clerks prepare statements for both ways a case could go, and there's another paper referring to the case from the opposite perspective. I'm 95% sure it's not the case, but there is a little bit of hope.
TlalocW
wryter2000
(47,940 posts)That Roberts will find another "justice" to write a more reasonable sounding decision that will have the same effect. I don't know how much power he has over the others, but it's my understanding that he can assign the majority opinion. He won't use Alito's but will ask Gorsuch or Coney-Barrett to write another one that he'll use.
mopinko
(73,726 posts)they have the delusion that this goes down better written by a woman.
markie
(24,017 posts)and I am not convinced that this is a done deal... but, your reasoning is one of an older person, like many of us, that fully understands life before Roe v Wade...
there are millions of young men and women that may be concerned but don't really, really understand the implications, and haven't seen and heard about the hundreds dead and damaged from botched self-induced abortions... I was one of the lucky ones and successfully ended an unwanted pregnancy by myself... many weren't as fortunate
LuckyCharms
(22,648 posts)First, I am sorry, and I feel for you, concerning what you faced at the time.
I know the details of my relative's activities. I know how he did it. I've heard first hand accounts of the lengths women had to go through to get an abortion before Roe v Wade.
I dated few women when I was younger who have had abortions, and know the emotional turmoil they went through, even though they had their abortions under the best possible conditions. Throw legal complications on top of that already difficult decision...
And you are right, unless you're at least somewhat familiar with what it was like back then, it's difficult to really have an understanding of what's going to happen should this ruling be officially passed.
All of this stuff actually blows my mind. Both women and men get raped. But if a woman gets raped, she might get pregnant. Why is she forced to carry and nurture the result of a rape? Pregnancy can kill a woman. Why is she forced to suffer that risk? What if a woman simply does not want a baby at that point in her life? What if she never wants to have a baby? It's her choice!! No one else is going to have to carry, deliver, nurture and raise that baby but her! So it's her choice, period!
BradAllison
(1,879 posts)Sam Alito will hold a gun to every justice's head as the decision is issued.Literally. Yes I mean literally.
LuckyCharms
(22,648 posts)What I did imply was the following:
Even if it passes, it will not stand. That's why I specifically used the wording "will not stand".
It will be revisited due to the chaos which ensues, or it will be negated with creative legal work-arounds at the the federal level.
BradAllison
(1,879 posts)There are seven stages of grief. You are now in Denial, but ready for 3 which is bargaining.
LuckyCharms
(22,648 posts)Maybe you can perhaps discuss the issue in a more reasonable manner without fucking mocking me with the LOL's?
What do you say? Give it a try.
Otherwise, you are not going to like my responses, because I know how to mock people as well.
BradAllison
(1,879 posts)And now, "we can fix it". Now, at the 11th hour, we can do something, that's the LOL.
This day was coming. It's been coming since 2001. I'm just surprised it got here two months earlier than I though.
Just remember, Sam Alito is doing this. Not a Trump appointee. A Bush appointee. Just to remind you when the die was cast.
LuckyCharms
(22,648 posts)If you are implying that people on DU didn't know, I think you are wrong.
So now the country at large will know. And it will hit them like a ton of bricks after it takes about a week to set in.
One more thing. You can be both a cynic, and polite at the same time. I'm stunned more people don't know that.
And yet another LOL in the body of your post!
You're a PEACH, Brad! A master of subtlety and understatement. Good job!
BradAllison
(1,879 posts)LuckyCharms
(22,648 posts)LOL
wnylib
(26,014 posts)I'll give you 0.
BradAllison
(1,879 posts)BOY I HOPE SOMEONE DOES SOMETHING ABOUT THIS!!!!
LuckyCharms
(22,648 posts)wnylib
(26,014 posts)even remotely amusing about this.
iemanja
(57,757 posts)by passing a law protecting abortion rights. I think that can be done with a couple of Republican votes. I see Murkowski voting for such a bill.
I don't think popular outrage will affect the court.
ramapo
(4,777 posts)N/t
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)mac56
(17,821 posts)llmart
(17,617 posts)The PBS series "Call the Midwife" dealt very significantly with what abortion was like prior to Roe v Wade, albeit in London. It as quite graphic and unsettling to watch, but for those who aren't old enough, maybe they should watch that episode. I'm old enough to remember it and old enough to know women who had babies they didn't want because they couldn't get a legal abortion.
mopinko
(73,726 posts)of reproductive health care. they've done an excellent job.
llmart
(17,617 posts)I've watched all of it right from the start. Incredible series.
mopinko
(73,726 posts)llmart
(17,617 posts)I watch that more than any other station. The only other subscription I have is Netflix.
a movie to watch as well....
IronLionZion
(51,268 posts)they probably can't get enough votes on LGBT and CRT hate alone. If inflation gets under control, they have nothing to run on.
This could easily be a test to see how the public responds.
LuckyCharms
(22,648 posts)couldn't care less about abortion, child predators, groomers, CRT, or whatever the heck else they are harping on these days.
They literally do not have a platform, so the only way they can try to steer the election (besides their normal blatant cheating) is by throwing stuff at the wall to see what sticks.
Cozmo
(1,402 posts)Karma13612
(4,981 posts)By having this bombshell drop now, the GOP are hoping that people will pay attention to this instead of the hearings which focus on GOP criminal activity.
Just a guess.
FakeNoose
(41,634 posts)I believe that MOST of the Repukes are Pro-Choice, most want to see the Roe v. Wade ruling stand. However they realize that they made a deal with the devil - so to speak - when they teamed up with the ultra-religious RWNJs because they needed the votes. The deal they made was, they would see that Roe is overturned. Well they have to go through with that because that was the deal. BUT once it's done they are through with the crazy ultra-religion anti-abortionists for good.
Most sensible Repukes are Pro-Choice and if they don't realize it now, they will very soon when they see how it affects their own children and families. They'll understand that there was a reason for that ruling and it had nothing to do with "religion." It had everything to do with women's rights over their own bodies and their own health.
If Roe gets overturned by the Supreme Court, we can be sure the public outcry will be amazing and terrible. Pro-Choice laws will be passed in every state, or ultimately there will be a federal law passed that undercuts the individual states. It will no longer be left up to the Supreme Court to "rule" anything because legal framework will finally be setup that will remove their discretion.
LuckyCharms
(22,648 posts)Whiskeytide
(4,656 posts)
BUT once it's done they are through with the crazy ultra-religion anti-abortionists for good.
They still need votes to STAY in power. They will still need to court the evangelicals - now even more so since this victory for them will galvanize their enemies. The new platform plank will be that the libruls want to make abortion legal again. Vote for us to stop them.
The battle over choice will probably never end. For the left, Roe was a reasonable compromise. For the far right, there simply is no compromise - ever. The simple fact that the new R party is unwilling to even make exceptions for cases of rape, incest and the life of the woman is all the proof you need that they are not at all rational about this issue.
MiHale
(13,032 posts)Youve put into words many of the emotions I have and just couldnt. I am an older man raised by a strong, intelligent, independent woman married for 49 years to a woman that cut from the same bolt of cloth. Not sure of the exact definition of feminism either, but yours fits my same belief.
People are people and should have equal opportunities and rights across the board end of argument.
If/when women that have been raped are forced to birth that baby THEY ARE BEING RAPED AGAIN but this time by the government.
ZonkerHarris
(25,577 posts)but they did cause they don't care about the majority of voters
those are the people they want to disenfranchise and control.
LiberatedUSA
(1,666 posts)Buckeyeblue
(6,352 posts)And then it will be up to us as a country to decide how we want to live. Do cross over voters who support civil rights but maybe don't like to pay taxes decide that maybe paying taxes is better than living in a theocracy?
Will the people who stayed home on Hillary or voted for Jill Stein out of protest (of what I've never been sure) see the error of their way and repent?
LuckyCharms
(22,648 posts)point in our history.
I tend to think that many people, including at least a few republicans, are going to get so fed up immediately, that something will have to change with either the decision, or the court itself. It all depends on the seriousness and duration of the guaranteed uprisings.
But again, I'm not smart enough to know what the mechanism of the change will be. There is always a line that cannot be crossed when it concerns an issue like this, but then again, I initially thought that there was no way that tfg would end up in the whitehouse, so I certainly could be wrong.
Buckeyeblue
(6,352 posts)Romney was pro choice when he needed to be but not now. We really need a constitutional amendment establishing a right to privacy. I don't know how we do that though.
Arazi
(8,887 posts)I gave up on hope porn years ago.
Brace yourself because Roe is going down followed by Griswold and then Obergefell. In fact, I would guess theyll be attacked within hours of the Roe decision becoming official.
lark
(26,081 posts)I don't think there is any way to stop it, they are determined to destroy womens' lives & force them to have babies. Next goes the right to free education and away goes Medicare and Social Security and 8 hour workday and OT. That will create a nstion of poor that will have np education, will work for pennies, get sick & injured & die young because they could not afford any care. That is what these fuckers want and have worked for the past 50 years. If they steal the 2022 election & then the 2024, America will be done forever and we will become just like Russia = no options & lives of dreary desperation from huge crowded families.
Brenda
(2,054 posts)Your post is another piece of evidence that men and women see this situation completely differently.
Men see it abstractly.
Women see it with their fucking guts, literally.
LuckyCharms
(22,648 posts)gldstwmn
(4,575 posts)Wouldn't a brand new case have to work its way through the courts first? That will take years.
LuckyCharms
(22,648 posts)That's what I meant when I stated that I do not know the mechanism.
I just have a feeling that this is going to be a turning point because the backlash is going to be so severe that a ban is going to prove to be untenable.
LiberatedUSA
(1,666 posts)This is their holy grail. Plus, they intend to attempt to steal the next two elections and turn America into an autocracy.
Only massive, massive Democratic voter turn out will stop this. If not, America will be radically different very soon.
LuckyCharms
(22,648 posts)a massive, historical Democratic voter turn out would be the natural result of massive pushback on this issue.
LiberatedUSA
(1,666 posts)LuckyCharms
(22,648 posts)That's what I'm saying. This could be the issue where even the most politically unaware voters finally say "enough is enough".
The abortion issue touches each of us, personally, in one way or another. I'm not saying that everyone has had an abortion. What I'm saying is, most of us know someone who has, loved someone who has, or knows and/or loves someone that may want or need to have an abortion in the future.
This is something that women have been legally and rightly "allowed" to have for 50 years. When you take away something that people are used to having, especially if it is something to be considered a basic right, the shit hits the fan pretty quickly.