General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsManchin just indicated he would not blow up the filibuster to codify Roe blah blah blah
Link to tweet
Paul McLeod
@pdmcleod
Big: Senator Joe Manchin just indicated he would not blow up the filibuster to codify Roe, saying he believes the filibuster is a check on power that preserves abortion rights. Without Manchin, the chance of passing Roe into law is pretty much zero.
8:54 AM · May 3, 2022
WTFing bullshit is this??????
onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)FoxNewsSucks
(11,684 posts)50 Shades Of Blue
(11,385 posts)BradAllison
(1,879 posts)What an absolute shit stain he is. Along with best friend Susan Collins.
brush
(61,033 posts)Nevilledog
(55,070 posts)Link to tweet
Farnoush Amiri
@FarnoushAmiri
Sen. Krysten Sinema: Protections in the Senate safeguarding against the erosion of womens access to health care have been used half-a-dozen times in the past ten years, and are more important now than ever.
8:34 AM · May 3, 2022
brush
(61,033 posts)She'll have to show her hand at some point.
Nevilledog
(55,070 posts)brush
(61,033 posts)tells you where his weaselly behind stands.
Nevilledog
(55,070 posts)Link to tweet
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
@AOC
We could protect Roe tomorrow, but Sinema refuses to act on the filibuster. Until that changes she can take a seat talking about womens access to health care.
Hold everyone contributing to this disaster accountable, GOP & Dem obstructionists included. She should be primaried.
Sahil Kapur
@sahilkapur
.@SenatorSinema on SCOTUS/Roe: Throughout my time in Congress, Ive always supported womens access to health care, Im a cosponsor of the Womens Health Protection Act, and Ill continue working with anyone to protect womens ability to make decisions about their futures.
Image
brush
(61,033 posts)the lead and helps organize street protests on this like the pussyhat marches back when trump got elected.
JT45242
(4,032 posts)No more of his "he votes with Biden" BS -- since they never make him vote when he would go against his nominal party.
Make him put his RWNJ stances on the record. I don't care if we burn any chance of him winning WV next time.
Make him and EVERY OTHER SENATOR put the vote on the record.
If he threatens to jump ship -- let him do it. It will only help us in NOvember to elect actual Democrats and not self aggrandizing, self-enriching scumbags who are beholden only to their own dirty coal business and the oligarchs who have bought them off.
aocommunalpunch
(4,579 posts)MAKE THE FUCKERS VOTE ON IT. MAKE THE FUCKERS VOTE ON IT. MAKE THE FUCKERS VOTE ON IT.
THEN, BEAT THEM OVER THE HEAD WITH IT.
Magoo48
(6,720 posts)lame54
(39,712 posts)He couldn't be happier
Response to Nevilledog (Original post)
iemanja This message was self-deleted by its author.
Walleye
(44,719 posts)He would literally be lynched back in West Virginia. There have been so many death threats. These people think God has sent them to save unborn lives. That justifies anything in their minds
Nictuku
(4,653 posts)raging moderate
(4,620 posts)Last edited Tue May 3, 2022, 03:57 PM - Edit history (1)
The sly little sleight of hand half-secret bureaucratic procedure which is currently mislabeled the filibuster is nothing like the original filibuster, which at least required real guts and energy and risk and effort. They in fact have already blown up the real filibuster. It no longer exists. We should not let them get away with pretending that this procedure is anything like a real filibuster. If they could do away wiith the real filibuster, then we can do away with this fake filibuster.
Magoo48
(6,720 posts)through intentional misuse and corrupt manipulation of our governmental systems and the general conspiracy to misdirect constitutional intent.
Bev54
(13,427 posts)and I think Murkowsky may as well.
Vinca
(53,943 posts)documents, it was pulled out of some senator's behind. It's anti-democratic.
Mike Nelson
(10,943 posts)... I think there is some nobility in being consistently in favor of this rule. However, when Republicans are back in charge, there will be only a consideration of what works best for Republicans. There will be no nobility... and rules will change quickly.
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)
Fullduplexxx
(8,626 posts)Emile
(42,182 posts)SARCASM
Torchlight
(6,792 posts)in reducing the bare minimum required to be a Democrat of good faith.