General Discussion

ck4829

(38,093 posts) Wed May 4, 2022, 04:03 AM May 2022

Since the conservative side of the SCOTUS is OK with citing a guy who relied on dreams, visions...

Link to tweet

Let's make this a thing DU, what other forms of divination, unscientific, subjective, and arbitrary methods do you think the conservative side of the SCOTUS might be OK with?

Dowsing rods?

Ad hominem attacks?

Whoever has the most money?

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Since the conservative side of the SCOTUS is OK with citing a guy who relied on dreams, visions... (Original Post) ck4829 May 2022 OP

Dunking COL Mustard May 2022 #1

Wait A Minute modrepub May 2022 #2

COL Mustard

(8,391 posts)

1. Dunking

Reply to ck4829 (Original post)

Wed May 4, 2022, 05:36 AM

May 2022

If they drown, clearly they were guilty.

modrepub

(4,195 posts)

2. Wait A Minute

Reply to COL Mustard (Reply #1)

Wed May 4, 2022, 09:56 AM

May 2022

I thought if they sank they were innocent?!? If we're going back to this form of justice, we need to know the right answer.

Reply to this discussion

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.