Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ck4829

(37,761 posts) Wed May 4, 2022, 04:03 AM May 2022

Since the conservative side of the SCOTUS is OK with citing a guy who relied on dreams, visions...

Link to tweet

Let's make this a thing DU, what other forms of divination, unscientific, subjective, and arbitrary methods do you think the conservative side of the SCOTUS might be OK with?

Dowsing rods?

Ad hominem attacks?

Whoever has the most money?

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Since the conservative side of the SCOTUS is OK with citing a guy who relied on dreams, visions... (Original Post) ck4829 May 2022 OP

Dunking COL Mustard May 2022 #1

Wait A Minute modrepub May 2022 #2

COL Mustard

(8,222 posts)

1. Dunking

Reply to ck4829 (Original post)

Wed May 4, 2022, 05:36 AM

May 2022

If they drown, clearly they were guilty.

modrepub

(4,109 posts)

2. Wait A Minute

Reply to COL Mustard (Reply #1)

Wed May 4, 2022, 09:56 AM

May 2022

I thought if they sank they were innocent?!? If we're going back to this form of justice, we need to know the right answer.

Reply to this discussion