Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TomDaisy

(2,120 posts)
Wed May 4, 2022, 03:14 PM May 2022

US Supreme Court public information line 202 479 3211

I asked why the... ahem....."leak".... was being investigated by the Marshals, but not psychotic, caught-red-handed, insurrectionist Ginni Thomas.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US Supreme Court public information line 202 479 3211 (Original Post) TomDaisy May 2022 OP
What was Ginni Thomas caught doing that has a relation to the Supreme Court? brooklynite May 2022 #1
Actively helping the plot to overthrow the government? Initech May 2022 #3
+++ JohnSJ May 2022 #4
What actions were specifically criminal? brooklynite May 2022 #5
Shh... Don't you know that we use the "Well, it's obvious" legal standard here AZSkiffyGeek May 2022 #6
what you need to be asking is why Justice Thomas' conflict of interest is ignored... Thomas Hurt May 2022 #2
 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
5. What actions were specifically criminal?
Wed May 4, 2022, 03:35 PM
May 2022

Yelling that the election was stolen by the Democrats/China/Venezuela doesn't count.

Add to which, what case is actually going to come to the SC? We are prosecuting criminal conduct. The Supreme Court doesn't overturn convictions because it wants to; it has to respond to a specific flaw in the law in question or the judicial process.

Thomas Hurt

(13,993 posts)
2. what you need to be asking is why Justice Thomas' conflict of interest is ignored...
Wed May 4, 2022, 03:25 PM
May 2022

while the leak demands an investigation.

Of course the answer is, the Justice are above ethics regulations.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»US Supreme Court public i...