Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSuggestion in discussion with person using RW talking points of punish the leaker.
Look really shocked and say, Oh my gosh! Do you really think they'll jail Ginni Thomas for this?
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Suggestion in discussion with person using RW talking points of punish the leaker. (Original Post)
halfulglas
May 2022
OP
Yes, I know, my point is the fake calls for prosecution from the wing nuts, like Cruz and
TeamProg
May 2022
#8
Obviously the leak hoopla is just a distraction from the act of taking away personal rights and
TeamProg
May 2022
#6
WE know that, but the RWs are pretending it's a heinous crime to shift the narrative.
halfulglas
May 2022
#9
OAITW r.2.0
(31,731 posts)1. Ginni Thomas.
She orgasmed on Clarence's leakage.
Hotler
(13,746 posts)7. +1 ... nt
TeamProg
(6,630 posts)2. It's not a classified document. NOT ILLEGAL to leak.
Look it up.
pnwmom
(110,216 posts)3. No, but someone could be fired, if it was a staffer. n/t
TeamProg
(6,630 posts)8. Yes, I know, my point is the fake calls for prosecution from the wing nuts, like Cruz and
McConnell.
There will be no prosecution because the leak was not illegal.
Duppers
(28,469 posts)5. Perhaps "they'' think so.
Would they be making a big deal otherwise?
Glad it's bothering them.
TeamProg
(6,630 posts)6. Obviously the leak hoopla is just a distraction from the act of taking away personal rights and
FREEDOMS!!
halfulglas
(1,654 posts)9. WE know that, but the RWs are pretending it's a heinous crime to shift the narrative.
If it were up to them it would be a crime just to disagree with them. Practically everything surrounding the Court is tradition, not statutory, apparently even ethics, and sadly justice. There is no justice in this pending ruling.
TeamProg
(6,630 posts)10. See previous responses to my original comment.
It will be clear.
ShazzieB
(22,333 posts)4. Not gonna lie, I burst out laughing when I read this post!
