General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMusk makes clear pledge to return Trump to Twitter
...if he manages to gain control and make that happen he'll be a fellow insurrectionist, demagogue, covid misinformation monger and race-baiter, since that will be the dominant theme of Trump's tweets. There will be no cleaning up this Twitter cesspool after Trump takes a fresh dump here.
As a more sane Twitter admin ruled, Trump's highly likely to encourage and inspire people to replicate the criminal acts that took place at the US Capitol on 6 January 2021.
Now it's clear, so is Musk.
Elon Musk pledges to overturn Twitters ban on Donald Trump
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/may/10/elon-musk-pledges-overturn-twitter-ban-donald-trump
dalton99a
(94,109 posts)
bigtree
(94,261 posts)...as a co-conspirator to trump's treason and threats.
Especially the way Musk is looking to ignore the previous ban and press forward, in spite (not despite) of the reasons given.
Scrivener7
(59,516 posts)bigtree
(94,261 posts)...besides, precedent apparently counts for nothing these days.
Scrivener7
(59,516 posts)bigtree
(94,261 posts)...you're posting on a Democratic message board, essentially messaging that nothing can, or will be done about this clear injustice.
What's the actual point in messaging that here?
FWIW, not a fan of that either. Sorry to upset you again.
Scrivener7
(59,516 posts)Thank goodness.
bigtree
(94,261 posts)...is entirely optional.
Things we find when we open threads, can be surprising.
Responses to our own remarks on those threads, not so surprising.
Thought I'd add that, since I have your rapt attention and consideration.
Scrivener7
(59,516 posts)say these things, no matter how obvious they might be!
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)TheBlackAdder
(29,981 posts)JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)2naSalit
(102,778 posts)There goes social media.
cilla4progress
(26,525 posts)I quit a couple weeks ago when this all started coming out.
SMDH...
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)This guy wants nothing but chaos.
pwb
(12,660 posts)no say in anything. Bill Gates help us out here please?
leftstreet
(40,666 posts)...guess there's no reason he can't tweet
Response to bigtree (Original post)
traitorsgalore This message was self-deleted by its author.
bigtree
(94,261 posts)...that would be the actual time when users would be 'supporting' him in some fashion.
But to put that into perspective, I had innumerable problems with the WaPo, for instance since my early adulthood. I wrote letters to their editor almost every week (got a half dozen published), but I don't believe I was 'supporting' every disinformation I responded to.
I'd pay for the paper, and read it, for what it was worth. That didn't make me a supporter, no more than their ombudsman.
I don't actually believe disengaging from major sources of news and information like Twitter helps much, especially if they still have that floor to themselves.
That might change if there's a mass exodus of reasonable folks. That includes all of the pols, newsmakers, reporters, journos, activists, and the rest that I trust implicitly. 'Twitter' doesn't blog much, but its participants certainly do.
redstatebluegirl
(12,827 posts)His only chance not to have to pay is to have Trump back and the GOP in control He sees putting him back on Twitter as a path to his reelection in 2024. I think it may backfire on him, people will grow weary of him quickly if he tweets every minute. Either way anyone who stays on Twitter after he takes over is throwing their support to the GOP.
Baked Potato
(7,733 posts)Baitball Blogger
(52,341 posts)Fullduplexxx
(8,626 posts)Torchlight
(6,820 posts)I'll stop clicking on any twitter link. I will not be able to, in good faith, provide that platform with any additional revenue, clicks or eyeballs.
And if it means I miss out on the juicy, insider gossip for-profit media passes off as current events, then I suppose I'll miss out on all sort of nifty, shiny, pretty things. My loss, I guess; wish I could work up the passion to pretend I'll miss anything substantive.
bigtree
(94,261 posts)...but I take your point.
I'd wonder where to find the activists, pols, journos, etc. that I trust, and who have kept me informed. There really wasn't a more comprehensive platform which featured the people who make and report the news, which features people who make then laws, who run the agencies.
What's left are the clearly compromised news orgs. and networks who only tell you what they want you to hear, and they don't feature some variety of sources. I remember well the days when we were forced to rely on what six or seven pundits on tv said about political events and initiatives.
The obvious result before Twitter offered its platform was groupthink that was nationwide, and it became an essential gathering for those folks I mentioned to convey their take on events. Really opened up the information landscape. Some good, some bad, but you're free to choose who you view on twitter, not so much on cable and network news.
And don't even talk to me about Google, which is one of the most subversive rw, platforms on the internet.
You know, actually the quickest way for Twitter to become a primarily right wing board is for most of the progressives and Dems to leave. Not sure how I feel about that happening.
Torchlight
(6,820 posts)And as I've never had an account there, I doubt they will miss my voice or that I'll have any measurable impact on the ratio of left to right wing subscribers/generators/accounts/whatever-the-format-calls-them. Musk's acquisition had me skeptical of his end-game for a platform I've mostly ignored, and his announcement today just validated my continued avoidance of the platform.
apcalc
(4,528 posts)Shermann
(9,062 posts)GusBob
(8,246 posts)That was the usual practice
Most posted here within minutes of the original
Irony can be pretty ironic
Shermann
(9,062 posts)tanyev
(49,284 posts)