General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTwo GOP judges just stripped social media companies of basic First Amendment rights
Two GOP judges just stripped social media companies of basic First Amendment rights
(Changed article source on this topic)
The First Amendment doesnt apply to Republicans anymore?
By Ian Millhiser May 12, 2022, 3:00pm EDT
https://www.vox.com/2022/5/12/23068017/supreme-court-first-amendment-twitter-facebook-youtube-instagram-netchoice-paxton-texas
"SNIP.......
The conservative United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down a brief, unexplained order Wednesday evening that will throw the entire social media industry into turmoil if the Texas law at issue in this case is allowed to remain in effect.
The decision in NetChoice v. Paxton reinstates an unconstitutional Texas law that seizes control of the major social media platforms content moderation process, requiring them to either carry content that those platforms do not wish to publish or be so restrictive it would render the platforms unusable. This law is unconstitutional because the First Amendment prohibits the government from ordering private companies or individuals to publish speech that they do not wish to be associated with.
As the Supreme Court said in Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights (2006), this Courts leading First Amendment precedents have established the principle that freedom of speech prohibits the government from telling people what they must say.
The Texas law prohibits a social media platform that functionally has more than 50 million active users in the United States in a calendar month from banning a user or even from regulating or restricting a users content or altering the algorithms that surface content to other users because of that users viewpoint.
.......SNIP"
MagickMuffin
(18,318 posts)Whereforth are thou. We needth you to punish these oppressors!
Historic NY
(40,037 posts)sakabatou
(46,149 posts)kelly1mm
(5,756 posts)have. They only have those privileges that the government allows them to have. How much of a crap sandwich have progressives had to eat due to companies being 'persons' in the law (Citizens United ring a bell?)
KS Toronado
(23,727 posts)we forbid you to interfere with Agolf Twitler & MAGAstanians posting lies & propaganda, and we're not
going to allow you to takeaway reQublicOns 2 greatest tools for reelection ie: lies & propaganda.
kelly1mm
(5,756 posts)privileges extended by the government. Companies do not have first amendment rights. Only people do. I find it strange that this is controversial on a 'progressive' board like DU?????
Cheezoholic
(3,719 posts)Bear Creek
(883 posts)They were given the same rights as people during 1800s. This is a big problem that caused a lot that is wrong today.
kelly1mm
(5,756 posts)Bear Creek
(883 posts)Good luck with that. Corporate owned politicians on both sides will need to be voted out. Changing the laws regarding election money would be a start.
Tommymac
(7,334 posts)You may not agree, but that is your prerogative.
Actually, corporations have been treated as 'individuals' as far as the law is concerned for a long long time - established corporate law goes back into the 19th century, at the least.
Until We The People elect more politicians that are not bound by corporate donations this will never change.
i.e. It will never change.
We have to reestablish or enact legislation in the US to control them and protect REAL people, as right now no government in the world can withstand the cash pressure from billionaires and corporation/cartels who have more $$$ then many countries do.
David__77
(24,728 posts)I think regulating that space to create space for speech is totally defensible.
msongs
(73,754 posts)cstanleytech
(28,473 posts)childfreebychoice
(476 posts)Roy Rolling
(7,632 posts)There is a social media company like thatTruth Social.
Its a failure and why other companies dont have similar policiesits bad for business.
So Republicans want to over-regulate companies into bankruptcy. Thats Trump economics in a nutshell, or, ETTD.
Novara
(6,115 posts)They DO have the right to moderate what is presented in their products. To tell them they can't is unconstitutional.