Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(51,200 posts)
Mon May 16, 2022, 01:52 PM May 2022

Millhiser: The Supreme Court just made it much easier to bribe a member of Congress







https://www.vox.com/2022/5/16/23074957/supreme-court-ted-cruz-fec-bribery-campaign-finance-first-amendment-john-roberts-elena-kagan

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority has been at war with campaign finance laws for more than a dozen years, stretching at least as far back as its decision in Citizens United v. FEC (2010). On Monday, the Court’s six Republican appointees escalated this war.

The Court’s decision in FEC v. Ted Cruz for Senate is a boon to wealthy candidates. It strikes down an anti-bribery law that limited the amount of money candidates could raise after an election in order to repay loans they made to their own campaign.

Federal law permits candidates to loan money to their campaigns. In 2001, however, Congress prohibited campaigns from repaying more than $250,000 of these loans using funds raised after the election. They can repay as much as they want from campaign donations received before the election (although a federal regulation required them to do so “within 20 days of the election”).

The idea is that, if already-elected officials can solicit donations to repay what is effectively their own personal debt, lobbyists and others seeking to influence lawmakers can put money directly into the elected official’s pocket — and campaign donations that personally enrich a lawmaker are particularly likely to lead to corrupt bargains. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) manufactured a case to try to overturn that $250,000 limit, and now, the Court has sided with him.

Indeed, now that this limit on loan repayments has been struck down, lawmakers with sufficiently creative accountants may be able to use such loans to give themselves a steady income stream from campaign donors.

*snip*


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Millhiser: The Supreme Court just made it much easier to bribe a member of Congress (Original Post) Nevilledog May 2022 OP
Maybe we (non-right wing humans) should organize a PAC Bettie May 2022 #1
i think the supreme court is completely corrupt now - like one of the samsingh May 2022 #2
I cannot say with absolute certainty this is the most Corrupt Supreme Court in U.S. history... msfiddlestix May 2022 #3

Bettie

(16,126 posts)
1. Maybe we (non-right wing humans) should organize a PAC
Mon May 16, 2022, 01:58 PM
May 2022

To buy ourselves a couple of republican senators.

I'm kidding, mostly, but FFS...

msfiddlestix

(7,286 posts)
3. I cannot say with absolute certainty this is the most Corrupt Supreme Court in U.S. history...
Mon May 16, 2022, 04:00 PM
May 2022

But it certainly feels that way to me.

I think they need to hear from "we the people", whether they're in denial about it or not.

but I wonder how many citizens even know, or even care.

tears and deep sadness.



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Millhiser: The Supreme Co...