Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

newdayneeded

(1,955 posts)
Mon May 16, 2022, 03:01 PM May 2022

My Supreme Court solution

If I could change the world, this is how I would make the Supreme Court picks. I know this could never happen, but;

Each party would get and maintain 4 Supreme Court justices. If there's a death, or retirement they and only they get to pick the replacement. Dems get 4, repubs get 4.

Whoever holds the Whitehouse gets to pick a term justice. One that's on all the way through the president's 4 or 8 year stint.

Votes would then not only be for president, but the SC majority. This majority would sway back and forth as the elections do, the SC wouldn't be monopolized for 20+ years, as it is today.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Stinky The Clown

(67,795 posts)
1. One the face, that seems as reasonable as any other idea.
Mon May 16, 2022, 03:04 PM
May 2022

I have not thought sufficiently deep to consider unintended consequences.

Amishman

(5,557 posts)
2. It would integrate the two party system into the actual mechanisms of our government
Mon May 16, 2022, 03:05 PM
May 2022

Can't say I'm a fan of that, I would love to see new viable parties in our political landscape.

I'd rather see a higher bar set (7 votes or even unanimous) for any decision that overturns a previous one.

RicROC

(1,204 posts)
3. keep these idea coming because what we have now is not representative of a democratic republic
Mon May 16, 2022, 04:40 PM
May 2022

I like your idea, but might suggest that the picks for Justices must first pass the Bar Assoc (0r whatever it is called) for who is qualified or not.

I realize they only rate lawyers and there's no rule that a Justice must be a lawyer. However, IF a pick is a lawyer and an independent body has rated that lawyer as being unqualified, that individual should not be allowed to sit on SCOTUS

Bev54

(10,050 posts)
4. How about getting the politics out of SCOTUS and have it based on
Mon May 16, 2022, 05:33 PM
May 2022

their judicial abilities only, to be nominated by a non partisan committee of judges or legal scholars or both.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»My Supreme Court solution